Sarkozy, holland, rape, immunity, the fittest

 Sarkozy, holland, rape, immunity, the fittest
madic50.blogspot.com

The French text is the reference

Paris , Monday, February 3, 2014



Mr. prosecutor




Subject: Concealment



Copy to:
President of the Republic
Prime Minister
Madam Attorney
The Minister of the Interior
President of the Court of Appeal of ParisProsecutor General to Paris




Mr. prosecutor ,
1) - ConcealmentMr. Sarkozy , Thursday, Jan. 30, 2014 , comments on the activity of Mr. Holland , head of state under former Head of State himself. He says that experience led him to think of what to say and do a Head of State.
 a- "When you're president , you have a duty"b- " In a democracy, there is nothing worse than a lie . "d- " The French can accept the truth even if it was difficult to hear "e- " We never lied ."
He speaks here , both , sexuality , through the case Trierweiler , unemployment, economic strategy.
The release states that " A Châtelaillon -Plage, his speech was also an opportunity to wear yet another blow to the current president François Hollande, who has failed to keep its promise to reverse the unemployment curve "
It is at this level , using his authority as a former Head of State , it seeks to destabilize the current Head of State , his successor, at least his image , calling successively irresponsible , a liar and a coward.
These words are part of the public policy of his candidacy for the presidential election of 2017.
What interests us here is that these remarks s' part of a discourse that is participates in the organization of the law. Thus, Mr. Sarkozy will remove it judges the possibility of burying the case Guillaume . He takes all. He assumes the truth , lies and refuses to have recognized under the Head of State as homework. He says never lie when it is for French .
So he forbade anyone to claim to protect its lies in the name of reason of state and the person , as he said " We have never lied ."
This is not only an invitation to examine the claims of Mrs. William when to possible rape at the Elysee. It is also the creation of an obligation to do so.
Of course , like all litigants , he wants to choose the truths he must face the lies that he must answer and its duties .

Judges are not required to comply with these legal views of individuals.
By cons , they can no longer hide behind a reason of state, this logo " secret" part onto the toilet paper of any public administration.
The fact that silent facts alleged rape , prostitution, pimping , embezzlement , assault against the Legislature can not pass to the height of view, it is very commonly become a manifestation of the qualification multiple uses of "concealment ".
Judges no longer have information , they do hold more , they classify more . They contain. The alleged misconduct is now going to be shared.
It only remains to say that judges , like so many others who at least do not boast to judge , that might makes right .
2) - The immunity stronger
Mr. Sarkozy was deemed to have constitutional immunity. This farce was demolished by the courts. There remains untouchable in the rape case . What type of immunity is it then?
1 - A typical caseA woman complains to 18 years against two of his cousins ​​who forced her to perform oral sex when she was between 6 and 11 years. As always in pedophile cases, where the child takes the breast or hair , it is no longer interested .
Is this due to a legal loophole that cousins ​​are not considered ? Nay . The facts are recognized and accepted by the court and the possibility of their legal qualification as well.
The prosecutor merely asked the woman to prove that the little 6 year old daughter was not willing to suck his cousins.
Anyone knows that imposing a sexual a minor under fifteen years report is a criminal offense .



Who can claim that imposing a prepubescent child, for five years , sight , smell , hair, sex and mouth , the intimate presence of sex, penetration, ejaculation, particular sexual violence in the sight of two men genitals erect noisy desire of these men may be part of the cycle of free games and made ​​a child of six to eleven years ?
As in any pedophile case , the presentation of sex is just as violent as its withdrawal. The suddenness of the abandonment of sexual dildo by his executioners is almost as traumatic as repeated use . All the young men abandoned at the age of puberty or their 16 years evidenced by their abusers . But I do not epilogue , it only fuels the pleasure of five bins of the state.
What concerns me directly in this testimony , it is the protection afforded cousins. She stood alongside the protection enjoyed by Mr. Sarkozy in the same case.
These people do not know , are not the same world, and yet they have the same implicit right to immune archaism .
The immunity of cousins ​​can not come from no one knows what constitutional farce.
That is why it takes the form of a militant immunity, immunity from attack.
Cousins ​​may be guilty . This is not a problem. The problem is the woman . It fails to prove she is not a slut who loves it in six years.
Cousins ​​therefore belong to another rule that the constitutional rule , that of the archaism of the fittest .
Justice recognizes sexual rights or constant operation of the strong over the weak especially in the most vulnerable areas. Thus does the public order.
This is why denounce rape by the strong on the weak justifies the torture until the withdrawal of complaints. The word is considered insane , torture is psychiatric .
All would be well in the best of worlds and "cousins" would continue as if nothing had happened to violate the " cousins ​​" under the protective gaze and enamored of state employees if an unscheduled had not slipped in ancient and immutable workings of the French State.The unshakable power of the French state is established on myriads of individuals within a population subject to French law alone . What was not expected is the emergence of new compact people referring to other sources of law, it is called the suburbs.
From there , the look of the state is no longer the only distribute "strong" and "weak." Hence the formation of dualities powers scattered .
If Mrs. William is right then Mr Sarkozy deliberately violating an MP would be fully in these questions of the multiplicity of sources of law and the formation of public authorities . According to the testimony of Ms. Guillaume , it establishes a relationship of domination of the executive power in the Legislature .
B- The immunity of Mr SarkozyThe immunity of "cousins" back from Mr. Sarkozy to its proper proportions . This is because he is part of the networks 'stronger' Mr. Sarkozy is not called to justice. As cousins.
It has nothing to do with constitutional law. The famous "constitutional immunity " is not even mentioned. The immunity that works is one that also covers " cousins ​​rapists ." We go from street to street Montpensier abbesses .
3) - The variables jurisprudence
1 - Inclusive and exclusive complaints
a- InclusiveJudges open investigations at the request of people who cite Peter Paul Jacques and Mohamed without written records to prove that Gaddafi gave to several million euros to Mr Sarkozy .They open investigations in which they pass in the hallways with litigants agreements that ensure their " big promotion ". As in the case Bettencourt .Etc. .They know from the outset that none will succeed.
Exclusive b-By cons , an opening of a preliminary investigation of an act of rape , prostitution, pimping hotel , embezzlement of public funds , from a public testimony, never disputed by the parties request, not interested .
2 - The complaint mirroredFor the same fault, but unproven in his case, Mr. Dominique Strauss- Khan, of the same rank as Head of State Mr. Sarkozy , is found naked , imprisoned , judged by the American justice system . He gave up his post as Secretary of the IMF without which it was not apparent .
Enjoying a non- place in the United States , he could lift his head . Accordingly, it has been in France a new procedure this time encounters with prostitutes. There is always constrained . A judge of the Court of Cassation, out of its functions, is involved in this persecution .
Strauss- Khan disliked the U.S. government. Mr. Sarkozy is an asset of the government.
 This distinction has become discriminating in the French government until the formation of language. All proposed changes in French law specifically designed to replace the principles of American law to those of the French law. For example, the statute of limitations .
It is clear that judicial activity accompanies this penetration of foreign domination .
4) - Report to the people1 - The settlement of accountsIt is symptomatic that the only investigation against Mr. Sarkozy actually concern its relations with the executive networks of the French state in their operations .
Hardly anyone can not have contact with Gaddafi , Mrs Bettencourt, or Pakistani generals .
The looting of float Mrs Bettencourt, the French do not care and do not identify with . Financing of parties, etc. . similarly . They trust in the justice of their country to maintain a certain order.
In the same way that elected officials do not want to respect speed limits or pay their fines , managers do not want to answer as all the people from his crime.
Both Mr Cahuzac Mr. Strauss- Khan had been sanctioned by the procedures under the settlement of accounts . They have not faced their possible mistakes but their supposed faults have served their ego to confront and defeat alter .
These complaints , network executives are among themselves . They congratulate each other on their respective merits. They use the justice as they are served by the crime.
Mr. Sarkozy is thus summoned to recognize the authority of the judiciary, constitutional bodies , etc. . He wanted to make , he exposed their contempt , he has caused . Through these procedures servants remind Mr. Sarkozy that he must deal with them .
2 - The ordinary justiceFor cons , the French include rape . Then they know what the words mean .
With the request for a preliminary investigation of a rape, the lawsuit move on . Rape, everyone knows . Mr. Sarkozy goes to the ordinary courts . This is the man who is considered in a case that is also a matter of state .
So would cause both the capacity of justice to judge a case that may involve the population, instead of rape in the public interest , the ability of a man who would be deemed rapist , if appropriate, to solicit the votes of his fellow citizens.
If Mr. Sarkozy answers questions on the book of Mrs. William, "The Monarch , his son, his fief ", concerning an alleged case of rape and prostitution of a set member , it necessarily respond to the title of citizen ordinary , like everyone else .
Which will be presented initially as a reckoning become a true democratic legal debate. Judges whether the drive.
They want ?
5) - The impasse
For now , Mr. prosecutor refuses to open a preliminary investigation on this occasion. His only action is to be insulted by Mr. Salomone Peacekeeper for him that he does not take into account the demands of dogs and workers.




There are no less than :1 - In questioning Mr. Holland, Head of State , as it has done in the name :a- In the primacy of his duties in the exercise thereof ,b- From the requirement of truth that applies to those who serve the French people,c- From the antagonism of democracy and falsehood ,d -Du oath never to have lied in statements directly concerning the French people,
2 - Mr Sarkozy has placed all those who are responsible for the French people, information concerning Mrs. William and an alleged rape that accompanies it at the Elysee Palace , in the obligation to keep in their possession nor lie, nor truth, nor unprofessional .
Retention of information about the duties , lies and truths , not now falls to the appreciation of a situation but the concealment of a criminal information.
Mr. Sarkozy can serve as a screen for example by joining the American theory To big to fail . It has indeed discredit any person to use his voice a lie, hide the truth , accept a breach of duty of the Head of State.
6) - The Power Fort
A -ApplicationMr. Dessertine , the archetype of the academic advisor of Prince, member of the High Council for Public Finance since March 2013, has claimed publicly in Tribune Figaro strong power.
According CEVIPOF , Centre for Political Research at Sciences Po , directed by Pascal Perrineau , other academic luminary , 50% of French demand a " strong power ".
The French thought naively that the Fifth Republic was designed precisely to address this issue.
The misunderstanding is that the founding of the Fifth Republic have meant by " hard power " of " strong institutions ".
The current Executives hear something else. "Power Box " is that a real man who has . A " paratrooper " a killer.

The B- fighterMr. Sarkozy goes for the standard incarnation of fighter capable of imposing a " hard power ."
In this context to the end of his penis , both a woman and the Legislature , draws the line strong brand power and the specific implementation manhood.
Judicial harassment of which it is the object from very diverse people (judges , journalists, lawyers , etc.). Understands that in mind.
It is under the scope of ongoing research activities. It is under surveillance.
These cases are designed from the outset as can not succeed. Would that for limitation periods.
By cons , they are an excellent means of pressure, negotiations immunities of attacking castes. The strong power to come will not knock those who have established a network of control man.
If the incarnation of the Power Fort wanted to start miseries to " intermediate bodies" , then they could find cases that result .
But again, this is the census Republic, between themselves.
Example, 1960:- The massacre of Algerian people , yes. The Occupation of the Palace of Justice and the Café de Flore by " Paras " , no.
C- OmertaThe rape of a member concerning the people, the entire population. There is no question of that fact. This is the Omerta .
Example, 1968:The foolish audacity small estudiantins defying bourgeois de Gaulle on the barricades , yes.The association with the stink of sweat Boulogne-Billancourt and the " Stalinist thugs " of the CGT who run , no.



7) - EquivalencyFilmmaker Woody Allen has just received a new oscar, the 24th . He is the director of the most successful world cinema. All players who have played under him.
This 1 February 2014, Dylan Farrow published in the New York Times an open letter accusing her father of sexual assault, giving his version of events :1 - The Facts- "When I was seven years old , Woody Allen took me by the hand and led into a dark attic, which looked like a closet on the second floor of our house. He told me to lie on my stomach and play with the electric train my brother . Then he sexually assaulted me . During that time he spoke to me , whispering to me that I was a good girl , it was our secret , promising that we would go to Paris and I'd be a star in his films. I remember having stared at the little train, focusing on me while he walked around the room on its rails. Even today, I find it hard to watch trains in plastic . "2 - Contempt of notable- "For so long, the recognition enjoyed Woody Allen has reduced me to silence. I took it as a personal criticism (...) . But survivors of sexual assault who told me - to support me, share their fear of speaking loudly to be a liar , to see that their memories are erroneous - gave me reasons to leave my silence, if only so that others know that they do not have to break their silence . "3 - Why say it?And the trigger was his Oscar nomination , yet another . " But this time , I refuse to fall apart . For so long , recognition enjoyed Woody Allen has reduced me to silence. I took it as a personal criticism (...) . But survivors of sexual assault who told me - to support me, share their fear of speaking loudly to be a liar , to see that their memories are wrong - gave me reasons to leave my silence, if only so that others know that they can break their silence . "
Here we have all the Sarkozy scenario.1 - Rape2 - Tell a lie , delirium, aggression against the State.3 - Who you elect ?
Certainly, the Oscar honors a professional. But it does more than that. It gives public recognition to a man with all the facilities that result. Woody Allen did not receive it you complicity in the survey which took place in 1992 about the rape ? In any case , the judge disqualified the investigation and refused custody to Woody Allen.
This woman just wondering how Woody Allen can garner honors without answering hers ?
Mr. Sarkozy by indicating that he will represent the title Saviour moreover, faced the same questions .
7) - ConclusionHow can we allow a former head of state to give , to the Head of State in office , public lessons of truth, lies, duty, without it meets itself an accusation of rape the person of a member , with prostitution , pimping and embezzlement .
The relevance of this question is also established by the fact that the alleged rape of a member constitutes a crucial experience of the first term ; those in which Mr Sarkozy is authorized to give lessons to Mr. Holland and justify his return to the direction of the state.
How can you let a former Head of State to define the relationship of lies and truth in a democracy in order to lead to new state , without asking him to account for the organization of a deliberate confrontation between Power Executive and the legislature by the alleged rape of this member ?
Mr Sarkozy wants to become , among other things, the " guarantor of the independence of the judiciary " s. 64 of the Constitution.
Imagine how it is that he can address the most senior judges to indicate their willingness to state without having explained to the most humble about what challenges his honor, his integrity, righteousness. ?
How pretend ensure civil peace when those in charge accountable for its cracks are silent accomplices of crimes that involve the balance of powers of the Republic ?
This truth which claims to Mr. Sarkozy , the French people must hear .
I renew my request to open a preliminary investigation to study the information provided by Mrs. William. I pay all of my writings on this subject since July 19, 2012 to this request.
Please accept, Mr. prosecutor , the assurance of my highest consideration ,
Marc Salomone