lundi, septembre 30, 2013

Sarkozy , Judge Gentil , judge, omerta , corruption pact , crs , African heads of state ,

d.50 @ gmx.fr
madic50.blogspot.com

Sarkozy , Judge Gentil , judge, omerta , corruption pact , crs , African heads of state ,




Paris , Monday, September 30, 2013




Mr. prosecutor in Paris


" Quo usque tandem , Catiline abutere patientia nostra ? "


Subject: Omerta , pact of corruption and inequality before the law


Copy to:

President of the Republic

Prime Minister

Madam Attorney

Mr. Minister of the Interior

Mr. Attorney General to Paris

Mr. prosecutor in Lille

The procurator Lady of the Republic in Bordeaux

Mr. Fillon Honorary Deputy Prime Minister



Mr. prosecutor

Chapter 1 : Introduction

1) - The inequality before the law
A number of lawsuits involve the existence or non-existence of legal proceedings . The diversity of some of them can not be explained without the existence of a legally inexplicable special judicial protection of Mr. Sarkozy .

as follows:
1 - The corruption pact
a- A judge must proceed by rumors of corridors to announce a future no need for Mr. Sarkozy ,
b- This rumor is constitutive of a corruption pact for oter Mr. Sarkozy a procedure.
2 - ill-gotten gains and rape
a- A judge makes a distinction between the public body and private body of a foreign Head of State to justify the charge of it despite its statutory immunity .
b- What is true for the so-called issue of " ill-gotten gains " of African Heads of State would not be for the rape of a member by Mr. Sarkozy , French Chief of State.
3 - Rape by Crs and that the Head of State
a- A judge holding a place Crs which directs a person liable to the Treasury of a traffic ticket to give him a blowjob. The Crs has accepted the refusal of the person.
b- What about the rape of a member by a Head of State who committed exactly the same crime, which increasingly has refused to hear the refusal of the person raped and forced her to taste the sperm of the rapist ?

2) - The right inequality
a- Applications to open a preliminary investigation filed by Mr. Salomone on the facts reported by Mrs. William relating to rape a member by Mr. Sarkozy have resulted in only a demonstration session of hatred and provocation of a traffic policeman charged to do so by the police commissioner of the place .
b- The refusal to follow are the result of a legal disqualification of the person of Mr. Salomone for social reasons .
c- This disqualification is the same as that experienced in the past by women in Napoleonic law . They also give rise to the same humiliation Commission sessions .

d- This does not concern only the request for Mr. Sarkozy . This legal discrimination extends to all complaints by people of the same social milieu as Mr. Salomone .

3) - Subject
It is the examination of the general corruption and judicial discrimination by studying particular cases concerning what this dedicated memory.

Chapter 2: The Covenant of corruption

1) - Information
The Chained Duck article says that Mr. Sarkozy has a special agreement procedure with the judge Gentil instruction .

cf. The Chained Duck Wednesday, September 18, 2013 , P. 3 " Sarko and judge signed the armistice ." DS Article for reference to several newspapers . The article ends with : "I want you, you want me ... "

Official recognition by the courts , the quality of the information usually supplied by the newspaper allows us to build on this article.

The purpose of this study is its relationship to the actual logic of the facts reported .

2) - Key dates
- March 21, 2013 indictment of Mr. Sarkozy
- On June 5, the Supreme Court refused to suspend the hearing .
- June 28, 2013, the prosecutor Bordeaux requires six non-places , including Mr Sarkozy and Mr Woerth. " No charge" burden.
- September 13, 2013 filing of the motion for recusal of Mr Banier and Maistre . The basis of personal ties between the judge and the expert retained Gentil .
- On 24 September 2013, the Court of Appeal of Bordeaux valid throughout the procedure and expertise .
- On 24 September 2013, the First President Bussiere validates the legitimacy of the expert .
All defendants are returned Corrections .
- September 18, 2013, the Chained Duck , P3, in an article entitled " Sarko and judge signed the armistice ," signed DS , as a reference to several newspapers , says Gentile judge is about to sign the non- instead of Mr. Sarkozy .





3) - The fairy tale

A- The newspaper article
The paper tells a story :
" 1 - It must be the legal battle of the century, it will be a pitiful disarray . On the one hand , Nicolas Sarkozy , indicted March 20 for abuse of weakness in the Bettencourt affair . On the other hand , the judge, Jean- Michel Gentil , head of Bordeaux judges who dared involve former President of the Republic.
2 - And then all of a sudden one , the case is spritz . Sarkozy , who loudly threatened to file a motion for recusal against Gentile and his colleagues, abruptly waived . And his lawyer swallowed his flank .
3 - The wicked judge becomes nice . Why this sudden volte face ? Because Gentile judge skilful to run rumors , whispers in the corridors , all things considered, it will give rise to non- Sarko . Wise decision to avoid defeat , given the thinness of the case.
4 - Most importantly, and more prosaically, Gentil watches a nice promotion and knows that a request for recusal against him would stain on his resume. I stop bothering you, you'll play in your corner : a story playground.
5 - September 13 , released by Mrs Thierry Herzog, Sarkozy advocate , counsel for other accused in the exam men in Bettencourt affair are resigned to drop him without the famous motion for recusal . And all bitterly regret mount only in court , especially as their customers are less parties that the most famous of them.
6 - Their application is mainly based on the severe notice Gilles Lacan , Advocate General at the Court of Cassation, which was not private , June 18, to castigate the many blunders and procedural errors accumulated by the judges of Bordeaux . Many blunders that made their risky business .
7 - September 24 , we will know the fate of the appellate courts to requests for annulment filed by former men set . Sarko was . Will he retire before the Gentile judge has signed his dismissal ?
8 - I want you, you want me ...
DS "

B- The paper tells the story of a fair exchange between a judge who wants a promotion and a litigant who just better not " stain " CV judge by maintaining a sterile request. In exchange, the judge granted him a non- place that anyway it would be imposed by the Court of Appeal as the case is thin. And justice emerges fairer, more effective , more humane .





4) - Analysis
Like all fairy tales the magic of this one does not stand up to analysis . Subject to the accuracy of the facts reported by the newspaper.

1 - The argument of " failed" no longer holds.
He has never held . Mr. Sarkozy withdrew the request and it was declared inadmissible . The presence of Mr. Sarkozy would not have changed the legitimacy of the expert . Insiders do not doubt that invalidation decision would be to stop any legal action and that it was inconceivable . This is precisely the logic of judicial fiasco announced through the press that the two instances of the Call and the Presidency , wanted to eliminate .
b -Something completely " pshit ." But it is not just the issue of the judge. After the rumor that vehicle providing a non- place , nice vera judge 's procedure confirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Call and the First President for the Challenge .
c- This rumor was not to anticipate a legal debacle that has not occurred. It was to organize the aftermath of the consolidation of the case. It is not a retreat but a deployment.

2 - spot
The newspaper is the " point man " of the explanation given by the judge Gentil its ambulatory posturing .
He " knows that a request for recusal against him would stain on his resume. "
However, on September 13 , the recusal motion is audiencée without Mr. Sarkozy certainly, but with other individuals .
On what "demand" of each would she "spot" on the resume of Judge Gentil and not "demand" of others? Judges studying the qualities of judge Nice for promotion do they distinguish between entachements ?

If the "spot" was the concern of the judge, it would apply to all "requests" which are all "spots" .

Judge does not care spots . Judicial solidarity is publicly manifested his place before decisions . Provided it is regular , promoting Gentile judge is not suspended in any one spot .

3 - out of the office
Gentile judge out of his office , the place of manufacture of the procedure to get into the hallway and there spreading a "rumor" .
It is not trivial to bypass the procedure in this case disclose decisions out of his office and written by his clerk .


If a prisoner is the hunger strike to enforce their rights, judges concerned will charge him this action wrong because he moves out of the legal process and that disqualifies by this fact.

As such, this circumvention of procedural exclusivity, even defective , is a contempt of court concerned and aggression against the institution. A man who has more than thirty of prison is now prevented from coming out on parole on the grounds he did one day hunger strike .

Gentile judge claims as a feudal privilege to circumvent the procedural rules in a Palace of the Republic. He must have a strong back .

The rumor is that he repents first public mental manipulation ambiguous criminal statute that is a litigant in particular.

The counsel for the defendant could alarm the nth failure of the judge to all the duties of his office. It does nothing and instead withdrew the motion for recusal was that the judge. It was precisely because it would have taken liberties with the procedure as to appoint an expert girlfriend in the case and beneficiary of a collection for this expertise.

Mr Sarkozy was the strongest applicant. It was enough to keep this request. He withdrew.

4 - The corridor
Gentile judge could make the dismissal from his office and know by his clerk .

If announces no need to come in the hallways, it is also to know that he already knows that his procedure will be validated.
Had is a procedural decision , he would have called his office. Mr Sarkozy had only to withdraw his complaints and queries.
But then the judge should have Gentil argue and say the opposite of what he said in his writings. These are those studied instances of Appeal when his walks .

gold:
a- He is convinced of the guilt of Mr. Sarkozy .
b- He can not fool the Court of Appeal and the First President who are to consider the arguments that have earned the indictment of Mr. Sarkozy .
c- He knows that the Court of Appeal and the First President will strengthen the .

What is it in the "corridors" ?
The procedure enables the rumors to try to cast a clear and form an implicit call to the other party to act . It does not give the dismissal without compensation to Mr Sarkozy . What the newspaper called "I stop bothering you, you're going to play in your area . A story playground. ".
In short, he instructs a parallel process to the legal process .

5 - The fable and interest
It might seem that this is an ego story. The judge wants the defendant folded before him.

This is where the story of the spot on the resume.

The judge does not simply lower the chatter of the defendant. The fable of the task , such as the blood stain on the clée Bluebeard , says Gentile judge has a personal stake in the case , an interest. Mr Sarkozy is the aim of the Rumor , as it is required to pass this interest.
Who could tell the newspaper that the judge feared a spot on his resume? The judge. It is he who engages in dialogue with one of the producers of spots and determines which .
How to say without speaking publicly ?
He introduces his personal interest in entering into personal contact with the person .

This extraordinary procedure , and frankly illegal approach leads the pas de deux in the corridors by a full moon .

If the judge had no personal interest in the matter of rumor, it would have happened by the official procedural route .

The newspaper that personal interest pass the benefit of the concern that the judge is Nice to the spot on the CV entailed maintaining the objection . We know that it is inconsistent.

6 - Convergence
Although somewhat as it may , the rumor has taken place and the conversation off procedure and recontre out the procedure and probably the law. This meeting and the conversation are both virtual and distanced does not change their behavior .

As this is not a spot for fear that you research it ? Little discount there any response from Mr Sarkozy ? It came in the form of withdrawal of the application . What follows on?


Mr. Sarkozy fails to appear Sept. 13 in the discussion of the recusal motion filed by himself and his co-accused . It matters little whether the lawyer should appear, Mr. Herzog in this case . It is Mr Sarkozy .

This absence will be publicly noticed and attibuée a willingness concliation with the judge that Mr Sarkozy and his counsel had severely thrashed .

Gentile judge did not need the advice of Mr. Sarkozy nor its accomodements , to make decisions and to be assured of the support of the judiciary in its proceedings.

Why he gets to frolic in the corridors of the Palace in telling anyone who will listen that he will make a dismissal in the case of Sarkozy ?

Why reply to these footwork Mr. Sarkozy withdraws you about the recusal motion he ardently desired since his indictment ? His co -defendants have not enjoyed their solitude and have indicated .

On what is this sudden convergence of refusal to attack the other?

7 - passassion market
The withdrawal of the application is not clearing a spot . It is the acceptance of a negotiation which concern the CV of the judge , so the interest of the judge. The argument of the spot told us the place of negotiation. This is his career, in this case a promotion that fascinates the judge said in the hallways.
The stain on the CV 's concern Gentile its promotion judge.

This imaginary stain terribly discomfort to the point that starts dancing in the hallways to draw attention to those who can remove it. Who? Just Mr. Sarkozy . Not on that of the judge in any case Gentil , the other applicants did not leave a stain on the CV of judges.

In what career you judge it for Mr Sarkozy ? In anything. The judge made ​​a good procedure. He knows it will be validated . It can only benefit . The fable spots does not concern .

And yet he sought the opinion of Mr Sarkozy and his alone .

What is special about this career at this point ? Gentile judge repeatedly asked for a transfer to other courts. Those in the know know and they can act accordingly. There he is made aware of a possible " big promotion ".

Gentile judge wants to announce it to the press, the French network managers, because he does not want his accession to the " big promotion " is a surprise and she does talk.

How is this " big promotion " for you it Mr Sarkozy ?

This " big promotion " does not stem from an internal review to the judiciary of its rules of play . It is a discussion , a policy, negocation . The fact that political, it may involve Mr. Sarkozy .

Mr Sarkozy may be a "spot" , an obstacle to the attainment of the " big promotion " because he is an integral part of this discussion.

If the " big promotion " had nothing to do with the opinion of Mr Sarkozy , it has not been requested and the legend of the spot would not have been invented.

This stain concerns that Mr. Sarkozy for the simple reason that it does not exist. It is the fact of the person Gentile court judge tacheuse , ie involved in his " big promotion ".

Why would Mr. Sarkozy there more detacher Mr. Banier ? Because Mr. Banier is not related to the " big promotion ". There ' is no reason to assign a task , it predicted a non- place , suggest him to do something as a withdrawal request , to show a sign. There is no need to judge.

The withdrawal is indeed a sign. The sign that Sarkozy has understood the meaning of posturing corridors J. Gentile and he responded favorably .

It meets as what is not particularly pressing Mr. Nice ?

The only answer he can give is that it is agreed that the " big promotion " J. Gentile is not impeded or, in the coded vocabulary stained judge.

In other words, the donors of the " big promotion " are people who are also in relations with Mr Sarkozy . In any case, they are worried for him. At the same time , they like the Gentile judge. They want everyone agrees and loves .

This is a discussion with several partners . Those with the " big promotion ", who accept its legal consequences , whoever receives the acceptance of these rules by the judge, who recorded this effort harmony widespread .
By spreading the rumor that will get the answer of Mr. Sarkozy , the Gentile judge does not favor a litigant because of his own belief , even in the state of prejudice.
Like a butterfly spreading its pheromones, it receives and transmits the terms of a transaction.
The judge made ​​the rumor , Sarkozy fails to appear, and the principle of non- place is officially recorded .
This is not a favor. It is a market

This is not exactly a disinterested argument. The exchange is not just an exchange of good process .

Mr. Sarkozy does not just receive it gives . There was an exchange without which the action does not work. Mr. Sarkozy is not only beneficiary of an unfair advantage. It participates in the formation of the decision.

The " big promotion " is unique in that it is " beautiful." Like all the beauties of the world , it has something more . More compared to what would be a promotion. More that can only be acquired in a transaction that can justify its legality at this point it must be held off-site diction of legality.

This is what the judges called a personal enrichment.

8 - corruption pact
Negotiation is not about a transaction to the file contents .

By putting the " big promotion " within the reach of the nice judge, protectors Sarkozy get the judge dismisses the charge against it.

This dismissal does not come from a apreciation file . He comes from a trading judge's career . Mr Sarkozy , by removing the " motion for recusal " concurs with access to judge a " big promotion ". In return , he received the dismissal .

The key to trading is that ultimately Judge does not have to justify its decisions.

The journalist concludes with these words: "I want you, you want me ... ". We are in France .



To break the record, the judge had to decide the dismissal in his office. If he leaves his office to discuss a justiciable, because the discussion out of the folder.

Both public actors and suppliers " big promotion " are all actors in a discussion to probably very subordination of judicial proceedings for personal enrichment magistrate and exoneration of a defendant 's guilt which the judge in the process of enrichment was convinced before the Proposion the " big promotion ".

If this is the case, this is what is called a pact of corruption. It is impossible not to see what is presented to us by the press as a judicial Carambouille that in southern Italy called a mafia corruption. A crime gang .

It will suffice to bury everything in silence the media sing the air of " thinness of the case" with the famous refrain: it had to end like that .....

What corruption today?

9 - certainties :
1 - These people are not poor. If the judges have watched over carefully to what the state can not enrich .

When a mental disability to Cotorep should receive damages from a thug, the prosecutor acts in person for the thug pays nothing .

2 - They are not mentally ill. Otherwise, the judges have watched over them to be recognized accessible punishment and prison destuction .

Chapter 3: The extension of the scope of protection
The protection afforded to Mr Sarkozy seems to have no limit .

If a judge must bow to Mr. Sarkozy , we understand that the judges involved did not even think to consider the application made ​​by a chap the opening of a preliminary investigation against Mr. Sarkozy for information of rape, pimping , embezzlement , breach of the constitution , abuse of legislative power .

Entrapment at the convocation of everyman nickname for a hearing takes his explanation in this corruption.

While we ask delusional mental patients for their actions , everything is done to protect Mr Sarkozy , whose ruling circles seem to have utility.

The paradox :
A- Action
Mr. Kennyatta , President of Kenya, whose father led the independence , was indicted by the International Criminal Courts. He is African and black.
Several African presidents in office are charged by the French courts for the offense known as the " ill-gotten gains ." They are African and black .
To indict the Heads of State in the French courts have dissociated the body of the Head of State, subject to immunity, the corp particular litigant as another . They are African and black .
Strauss- Kahn , IMF President at the relevant time , having the status of Head of State , immunity that accompanies it, is indicted for acts of sexual assault in New York and the made of pandering to Lille.
To accuse , Lille , judges establish that the mere kiss a prostitute constitutes pimping . A judge of the Supreme Court intervene outside of its functions to stigmatize the accused.
Strauss- Kahn is French and white, but it hinders the United States .

We note that in all these scenarios , judges have demonstrated legal imagination to achieve the indictment of the defendant.

B- Omerta
By cons , it is unbearable to French judges only hear Mr. Sarkozy , European framework associated with the United States, to discuss with him a rape case of a member and financial and statutory crime in the exercise of its functions.

Subsidiary Question , how the penis body of Mr. Sarkozy is it?
a- The State
In this case, it must file the appropriate service to use them when he left .
b- The individual's ?
In this case , it must meet the criminal use of his penis to justice.








Chapter 4: The banality of charge

1) - The Facts
The 24,09,13 , here's what we learn from a free newspaper Metro :

" COMPANY - He was indicted for accepting bribes and exhibition ...

1 - A CRS A13 was indicted in Versailles ( Yvelines ) for " indecent exposure " and " passive corruption " and jailed Tuesday after demanding sexual favors against the promise of deleting records , a prosecutors said Wednesday .
2 - On 19 August, on the A13 , at Morainvilliers (Yvelines), the policeman highway CRS proposed a woman to cancel its PV in exchange for sexual favors.
3 - It is also indicted for older "multiple facts ," said the prosecutor of Versailles, without giving further details. The investigation was entrusted to IGPN , " police policies ."
4 - "The pants down " in the police car
According to Le Parisien , which broke the story , that day , the officer of the motorway company West - Ile de France , only on a police vehicle, a respondent to a mother 35 years the order to stop at a rest area Morainvilliers . " He noted a series of infringements on the motorist's vehicle (...) in their car to write fines before asking her to join him ."
5 - " Stephanie then saw the policeman, his pants down and excited state . He argues that the records could be erased if she appeared conciliatory , "reports the newspaper .
6 - The refusal of the mother, " the policeman dressed , do not verbalize and offers to escort the woman home ," says Le Parisien , which states that the officer confessed .
With AFP "

2 ) - Analysis

1 - Identity

This is the replication Sarkozy affair .

A person invested with public authority built reports invested this authority to a person third person as a ratio of personal dependence of the second to the first .



The representative government uses this dependency created by itself to get his penis and require a blowjob against the end of addiction.

1 - In one case, the grant of an MP is transformed by the authority of the Executive Branch to request a personal advantage. It is conceived as involving the subordination of demanderaesse the whim of the executive authority . This person becomes a dispenser of favors .
2 - In the other cases, the organization of the implementation of a fault motorist person allows the staff member to say that there is dependence on the driver , man or woman, in respect of the employee manager fault that he himself caused . It becomes dispenser of favors .

In both cases :
1 - The public market space corruption is established by opening pentalon , the output of the penis, the claim of fellatio.
2 - The physical scene is accompanied by a morality play that set a new contract charitable guy who is common to all rapists : the rapist instead the dependent person in a moral obligation to provide a service to a person in a state of great physical distress , sexual here .
a- In case : " You can not leave me like this ... "
b- In the other case : Be nice ...
5 - The contract is completed by the fact that both parties have access to the suffering of the other party and show generosity towards each other.
6 - The dependent person who refuses to fulfill the contract shows that it is a vile selfish.
7 - She deserves the punishment that accompanies this refusal :
a- The refusal of the grant
b- The validation of the ticket.
8 - Cqfd .

However, there is a major difference between the two criminals :
1 - Mr. Sarkozy refused to give way to the expression of a refusal on the part of the member . He went through with the sexual exploitation of the woman, the realization of sexual enjoyment . He pronounced the ritual formula of rapists : What is missed or I have not even enjoyed. It is important that the rapist through disqualifies the person raped . Slut and incapable .

2 - by Crs against the refusal was able to hear the conductor to accept oral sex, he stopped in his process of sexual exploitation of this woman. He acknowledged the denial of women as its own law and he acknowledged his subordination to the law.



Yet Crs is charged and detained before trial. However, the Crs not able to intervene on the offense . Therefore , it is the name of disturbing public order that would represent his continued freedom he is incarcerated.

The incarceration of the defendant indicates that merely a proposal and a sexual exhibitionism are legally classified as a criminal activity . This ranking takes place with the agreement of the police hierarchy and unions.

For good measure we added to it all the faults included in the administrative record. This is a classic all offensive kind of employers to get rid of an employee of such person . The same processes encountered in voluntary associations.

What concerns us here is the simplicity of the statement of facts in judicial decisions :
1 - For the Crs , the act is about rape. It will remand prison. Radiation and barely firm covering preventive necessarily follow .
2 - For Mr Sarkozy , the act is of the order of about table. Anyone who has asked to justice is considered an obsessed procedure which sees evil everywhere and did not understand that women MPs are " sleeping " satisfy the sexual needs of men of state.

These two cases are perfectly comparable terms under identical legal realities.

The same applies to other cases studied in previous correspondence. This comparison of the proceedings against Mr. Strauss- Kahn , President of the IMF, the rank of Head of State at from the Commission: the facts and the abscence of procedure vis-à -vis Mr. Sarkozy , forefront head of state from the Commission: at the facts.

Once again we are faced with an inequality before the law between the French .

Conclusion

Under citizen and taxpayer , I should accept :

1 - That sends preventive prison, that it raises many questions and costs, an official who knew the voice of the victim , so the law and stop the crime , so that it covers the same crime on the part of a man who was not even able to hear the voice of his victim and then persevered to the end in denial of the law.

2 - What's in a courthouse , organizing a corruption pact with personal enrichment of the magistrate, at taxpayer expense , and subsequent non- place for defendant. This, for sure , if we are to believe the facts reported by the newspaper and so likely as the judicial reputation of this newspaper.

3 - Let us organize the omerta on the rape of a member of Parliament, the Treasury, the Legislature .

4 - Whether organizing a legal mafia and crime during the mentally ill.

That's it?

Please accept, Mr. prosecutor , insurance Sincerely ,


Marc Salomone

Aucun commentaire: