omerta , prosecutor, Sarkozy , Meyers- Bettencourt, Strauss- Kahn, inequality, justice , mental health , disability.

omerta , prosecutor, Sarkozy , Meyers- Bettencourt, Strauss- Kahn, inequality, justice , mental health , disability.

madic50.blogspot.com

d.50 @ gmx.fr

translation , google translation
The reference text is the French text .

Paris , Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2013




Mr. prosecutor in Paris




Subject: Omerta and inequality before the law

Copy to:

President of the Republic

Prime Minister

Madam Attorney

Mr. Minister of the Interior

Mr. Attorney General to Paris

Mr. prosecutor in Lille

The procurator Lady of the Republic in Bordeaux

Mr. Fillon Honorary Deputy Prime Minister





Mr. prosecutor

Part 1: The litigants valid

Prosecutors in Bordeaux opened a criminal investigation against Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers . This lent a sum of money to the book of his mother, Mrs. Thibout . This woman is a key witness wrongdoing that could take place in the circle of Mrs Bettencourt mother to rob . By feedback effect , an uncovering of a corrupt pact between Ms Bettencourt - Meyers and Ms. Thibout , to buy the chatter of a benefit to the concerns of the other , serve the cause of the Housing Review in this case. Which Mr. Sarkozy .

Thus, there was opposition from the noisy processing Strauss- Kahn case by the prosecution of Lille and the omerta of the case Sarkozy in Paris.
There are now opposition noisy processing Meyers- Bettencourt by the prosecutor of Bordeaux and the same code of silence about the case Sarkozy in Paris.

In both cases , important people are the subject of criminal investigations, even longer in the case of Mr. Strauss- Kahn .
These cases are correlated with each Mr. Sarkozy :
a- Let the identity of alleged misconduct , such as the charge of use of prostitutes and pimping is .
b- either because the criminal investigation against Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt serves the interests of Mr Sarkozy in a case that is to be indicted.

I analyzed previously inequality before the law enjoyed by Mr Sarkozy in Paris in terms of legal action against Mr. Strauss- Kahn in Lille.
This Lille justice moblise not only the procedure and its instances. A First Advocate General at the Court of Cassation comes under the civil society in the process to convict Strauss- Kahn . In the silence of his association, EACP on the similar case for Mr. Sarkozy , he accredits the evidence of the innocence of the latter. Paris knows intervene in Lille and Paris to organize the silence .

I analyze here the reports of the opening of a criminal investigation against Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt and judicial silence on the crime of Mr. Sarkozy inferred by the accuser information given by Mrs William.

I care nothing of said Bettencourt . I do not consider certain aspects that measure legal action in Bordeaux that concerning the case Sarkozy in Paris.
The fact that Mr. Sarkozy is indicted in Bordeaux in the said Bettencourt highlights the omerta it enjoys in the case Sarkozy in Paris.

The indictment in Bordeaux and Paris this omerta to Mr. Sarkozy draws our attention to the place of the criminal investigation against Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers in Bordeaux.

Meyers - Bettencourt is suspected of having made ​​a pact of corruption with a witness away through the courts a number of persons associated with his mother . She accused somehow empty the pockets of it .

The index of the pact would be ready by Meyers - Bettencourt an amount of EUR 300 000 to Mrs Thibout , notary , in November 2012

The concerns of Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers had previously led the public family compact by which the Finance Directorate of Mrs. Bettencourt mother are part of the company Loréal those entrusted to Meyers - Bettencourt and son . Ms. Bettencourt has invoked its charitable wishes.

I can only follow the changes in the log of a legal action in a case which does not affect my thinking . By cons I ask my suvante question:
What about the public understandable moral actions of the protagonists of the Bettencourt affair?
It is interesting to assess the omerta that weighs Sarkozy in Paris on business.

The media is our only source of information , let's see the moral value of the action of Mrs Bettencourt Meyers on which justice has his accusers suspicions point of view in its action the commission of any criminal offense ?

Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers has to avoid is that , rightly or wrongly, the theft of the family by strangers to it . She did nothing else. She did not process any case , got no enrichissemet or no benefit other than to prohibit the family funds to persons outside the family.

There is a banal reading of the facts that hold the attention of the court.

The fact that it makes a loan to an associate of his mother whose distress is public because it has been the subject of reports may well be considered the moral support to serviteuse family .

Ms. Thibout denounced his superior . It was fired. She lost her professional reputation. It is ruined . This is plausible.

A loan repayable by nature, 300 000 by Meyers- Bettencourt to an employee under nothing exorbitant . It is neither in blackmail, nor in the due, or in the purchase of a speech or silence.

The formula mail Ms. Bettencourt Meyers Ms. Thibout , July 11, 2007 " We appreciate your commitment to provide us with when the time comes , your competition and we thank you " is the usual formulation of Master domestic, chief subordinate , Men of State faithful 's of Lord vassal . The works of de Gaulle contain whole pages . They apply legions of honor for their recipients.

Thibout Ms. Bettencourt has served the House . The did she served on order? This is apparently what he wants to know justice . Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers had to answer this July 17, 2013 to the financial brigade in Paris.

Nobody is supposed to act in breach of the law. It is the delicate balance of self-defense. Heroism of the crime , there is the space of judicial interpretation.

But that is exactly what he appears to be . Meyers - Bettencourt thought the family fortune was in danger. Fortune is a little more than money . It is the ability to cope with responsabiltés that due to this family. What is their world.

Through the opening of a criminal investigation of the public may believe that Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers is a wicked woman ready for anything that attacks white geese. The discovery of a corrupt pact between "the" Meyers- Bettencourt and "the" Thibout could finally do recognize the good faith and proper right of victims of both ogres . Those people who are indicted in this case have filed a complaint for perjury.

The press told us a few weeks of the decision of the judges Bordeaux instruction , responsible for deciding possible referral to the court for abuse of weakness or otherwise non-places , this hearing is timely for indicted starting with Niolas Sarkozy .
Counsel for Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt told a press wants to " come to the rescue " of MM . " Banier , Maistre, Woerth and others ."

It is indeed the implementation perspectives of two camps. That Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt and the strangers to the family.

Everyone noted that these are the people cited by connoisseurs who came back from Mrs. Bettencourt mother and not Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt who went home.

Ms. Bettencourt Meyers have taken any steps to outlaw them out of the temple? Justice will tell.

But it has driven you ? Are the snow geese ?

It is not uninteresting when it involves a mother who wants to defend his mother against what she believed to be predators know a little about who they are dealing with .

Again , this does not give the result of the investigation into the legality or not practical combat Meyers - Bettencourt, but it allows us to understand that takes place between the struggle.

I have no public information on MM . Maistre and Worth.

This leads us to the discussion of public morality detectable main protagonist of the Bettencourt affair , Mr Banier .

We have street lights on Mr. Banier .
This is the main concern of the Bettencourt family. It is from him that the master of the family on his fortune was seen as endangered.

- A journalist has taught us that the Anglo -Saxon press reported homosexual relations between Mr Banier and Mr. Bettencourt father, husband of Mrs Bettencourt mother.

Homosexuality Mr. Banier seems evidenced by the news report that Mr. Banier looked in Custody an inspector : "You have a nice ass , Mr. Inspector ."



Censorship operated by the French press made ​​incomprehensible individual links Mrs Bettencourt and Mr. Banier . It was covered with gold so that her daughter decided to make a quick cloth.

Why did she give him that?
With the Anglo -Saxon press, we understand that the love of the life of Mrs. Bettencourt was her husband , Mr. Bettencourt . Ms. Bettencourt would have continued to live this love through Mr. Banier .
In short, the family would have considered that if the memory has no price, it began to have an excessive cost.
The French press has chosen to tell us the story of a photographer artist enchanting talk persecuted by an uneducated carabosse fairy.

b- It does not tell us who he is morally .
The image of the artist victim of jealousy of the family of his patron who does not understand the art or the intergenerational passions seems in any case to miss the character.
The Chained Duck Wednesday, July 31, 2013 , P. 4 devotes an article to Mr. Bannier . "Summer Stroll on the land lord Banier , Duke of Provence . "
The humorous as well in the diary gives an amazing insight into the character. Mr. Banier can not complain about the harsh manners and aristocratic owners. It is itself a squire of the worst kind .
1 - He despises the people
a- The former mayor of Brouzet -lès -Quissac , Gard
- "He would not even see the houses plastered neighbors when driving around . He said : "But you 've seen these horrors ? "
b- M. Feuillade , neighbor
- " I was sent wandering goalkeeper who came home with a dozen cypress in a trailer . Banier wanted them to plant on our land to not see us from afar . ".

2 - A problem of legality
The Chained Duck has never been found wanting in terms of its information. These give Mr. Banier a different picture than the force-fed goose unbeknownst voluntarily .
Also tinted wickedness of sadism , we meet with other gay and enriched said temperament artist , Mr. Banier has with the legality of complicated relationships and even judiciary regarding its ability to corruption. Except error log.
Surprisingly there is no person to complain about.

Judges consider that a major French industrial notary ready money to a former associate is under suspicion enough for a criminal investigation into a potential for corruption pact . Whatsoever.

By cons , judges are neither seized nor grasp that Mr. Banier obtain :
1 - By means of parties, personal relationships without professional foundations , the entry in the inventory of historical monuments of his property.
a- This means that the taxpayer pays part of the bills for the maintenance of the property of Mr. Banier .
When Mr. Banier begs to state , it is also being gradually receive 500M euros from Mrs Bettencourt mother. If you believe the media, if Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers had not put a stop , the mechanics of his relationship with Ms. Bettencourt mother led Mr Banier to go to the collection of nearly one billion euros .
b- Justice is entitled to question the meaning of loan Meyers - Bettencourt .
It would also require that justice enquière arguments by which Mr. Banier has classified this property as this possibility had escaped his previous owners .

2 - That the architect of buildings in France , the prefect of the Gard, the regional prefect , prohibit the construction of a useful building located 400m 180M2 land classified for housing and a winemaker in his land.
This apparent obstruction to the functioning of a productive company aims to satisfy a political vanity spectacular. What can justify Zero percent growth ?

3 - That the same authorities allow :
a- The construction of a wall previously nonexistent .
b- exceeded all limits set by the writings of Mr. Banier commitments vis-à- vis the authorities in construction .
c- The destruction of sheep origin, while Mas is classified and that includes fixing all the property around 500m .
d- The construction of a building of 600m2 and 9m in height instead of the fold. This, then it is denied a professionally useful building 180M2 .
Administrative e- posteriori coverage of all these legal antics .


f - It is clear that the authorities banned the productive and unproductive cover for satifaire the only vain for a particular policy.

How is it that the authorities are actively engaged in an activity which, if you believe the newspaper reports of corruption, abuse of power , economic parasitism ?

In this case, Mr. Banier does not pick up as an old lady full of memories . They would be funded by the Treasury. It also manipulates the senior staff of the public administration in its sole private profit. And that concerns us directly .

The title of the newspaper clearly see the legal relationship that would established between this man and the authorities. Former reports of regime. They are illegal. The government corruption may just be an illusion, but as the newspaper staged , it is blinding .

To make fast, accurate information , authorized simply to prosecutor concerned to contact Mr. Laurent Alberola , current Mayor of Brouzet . He sent a letter to this effect to the prefect of region , on 8 July 2008.

For what interests us , we see that Ms. Bettencourt - Meyers did not matter to naive people. She faces calculating minds , greedy, unscrupulous .

Judges know . Yet they open a "criminal investigation." Whatsoever.

The Meyers- Bettencourt is not my concern. I'm not arguing the merits of the action of each other . Justice tell us what it is.

Except that the implementation of procedures for justice must be the same for all , all things being equal.

However , I note that :
a- A woman who defends his mother, his fortune, and that of his children, his family for short, which is against wild beasts , is the subject of a criminal investigation , a term already marking to the public.
b- By cons , some players including trustworthy people report that they are actors clearly dishonest or outright criminal acts , enjoy judicial omerta .

There's clearly a inequality before the law which is the subject of my thoughts and my address to justice.

Who are these people ?

a- Mr Banier
We see that Mr. Banier for accountability in the management of its relationship with the executives of the public involved in the allocation and management as a historic monument.
Who can accept a particular and officials play feudalism prevent a producer to turn its business effectively , while France runs after 0.1 growth?

b- Mr Sarkozy .
I do not know the implications of Mr Sarkozy in the case Bettencourt says Case . I do not care at all.

For cons , I asked last year to open a preliminary investigation of the facts reported by Dr. William accusers . The use of qualified rape , pimping , theft of Treasury, embezzlement , rape of the Legislature , abuse of power to create a parallel law, are necessary to account for the testimony of Mrs. William.

The question is therefore:
Meyers - Bettencourt is the subject of a criminal investigation when there is nothing moral in its approach.

Why Mr. Sarkozy is not it the subject of a preliminary investigation when he can not claim any morality? Unless the act of placing a pimp market with MP ( You suck , I give you your grant) is considered an institutional norm by magistrates .

Subsidiary Question
- Here we have a case of two people of the same social status as Mr. Sarkozy . Either by the state . Either by the company .
One of them available at the time of the facts of the same immunity as Head of State guarantee.
These two people are involved in legal proceedings even if the facts alleged are apparently less serious than those alleged by the testimony of Dr. William M. Sarkozy .

b- The only legal response to questions for Mr. Sarkozy in Paris resides outright Omerta . When there is a court hearing is deliberately sabotaged and order by the traffic officer responsible for taking the deposition.

Who will believe you are a statesman who said he was ready to run a second time the state can not account for the judge and the people of crimes that are charged by a setting worthy faith? The information has been taken by a press never faulted in his information. They have never been denied by those involved.

On whose behalf this Omerta ?

Part 2: individuals with disabilities

We have seen that Mr. Sarkozy has the omerta that do not benefit their state or social alter ego.

What about those who are at the other end of the social chain ? The most vulnerable, the weakest, the poorest. The COTOREP .

We just bring me a present true story that illustrates perfectly the status acquired by the mentally ill , the cattle of social and state transactions.

It is the exact parallel in poor comparisons among strong between the reports of Mr. Strauss- Kahn , Ms. Meyers- Bettencourt , justice and reports of Mr. Sarkozy to the same justice

We can observe the difference between judicial action and the mentally ill to Mr Sarkozy on charges of similar qualifications.

The mentally ill have become a place of negotiations , through the conspiracy between state officials and thugs , an installation site by thugs plunder and enslavement of mentally disabled and other vulnerable people .

It is clear that :
1 - the mentally ill are in the prisons of sealant manufacturing statistics of the effectiveness of the state.


When you do not want to take the bad guys , but decoys, prisons with the mentally ill is filled . 30 % of prisoners are mentally ill upon arrival. They are called mentally ill by psychiatrists and statistics, but officially to the public, they are dangerous criminals apart from the street by the vigilance of agents of the state.
QED.

I still remember to this criminal policy is the law of Nuremberg and crime against humanity.

2 - Not only the public handling of the mentally ill in crime does not stop, but since the case of the slain student from Marseille , the press informed us that cases have increased. Handling the madness of the mentally ill to make public aggressors is evident in media accounts .

They are not mentally ill who go on the attack , which would be more dangerous than before. It is the policy of the State that the doctrine of criminal incarceration of the mentally ill organizes them as a place for negotiations between the government and the thugs . It is clear that the mafia factions and circles , suburbs and elsewhere, the message 5/5 .

I had never touched the finger at social diffusion of this policy. How do you diffuse it within the population?

This history allows you to view traffic authority gives the transformation of the mentally ill in public places in state negotiations.

It can be verified in accordance with the adversarial , called also the respect of the human person .

Here's the story :
A young man spent the last twenty Alsace phone to his half-brother, forty years old , living in Paris . They are both from the North. Their common mother died . Fathers are forgotten.
The called party has spent his youth in foster care , also excellent . He is vulnerable. His wife is Cotorep for mental disability. His four children are placed. It takes full advantage of the Ordinance of 1945.
In the United States his family already longer exist.

The appellant is a mental disability. His wife is a mental disability. They are Cotorep . They are aware of their disability.
The stage is set .

The young man said that since 4 years carries an electronic bracelet. Why ? Because he was the subject of a complaint to touch.
Calumny that exists only for people as it should.
Here, from the police and judiciary vis-à -vis the world , denunciation is conviction.
As they say in Paris unionists psychiatric Gestapo : " We are not here by chance . "
I know the lawyers for the poor. They are against their client. It is too systematic to not be universal .
It took five years of electronic bracelet and weekly presentation to the police . It's been four years since the door and it points .

The accusation came from the daughter of a couple of neighbors who did not like them .

What is interesting is that the young say, the neighbors saw that we were not normal , disabled . They took advantage of our weakness. We are not in blindness but resigned in the usual observation of the weak and vulnerable.

This young man has found a job . What in this area today is an achievement .

The laws on sexual crimes were made within the scope of lobbying U.S. devout sects , Anglo- Saxon . The principle is that the purification of the race, the elimination of plague , the eradication of evil. Because the virus which these people carry is Satan himself .

Consequently, as in the Middle Ages for lepers and for exactly the same reasons, convicted sex should not only point to the police but also declare their legal anomaly, their electronic bracelet to their prospective employer.

This is not the passage of legislation . This is the distribution of incantations of demonology .

If convicted say they have a bracelet, they are not employees.
If they do not , they can not submit a certificate of employment to the police when such control .


What are they doing ? Afraid to face the fury of the police , they are not going to control. The police will look directly at the company . The boss learns that he has an employee who has a bracelet. It is transferred to the field.

The Labour Code is not made for sub-humans . The Constitutional Council has formed a new class of employees for which the menial labor code does not apply . Orders to violate the law and the constitution are high.

To go to Germany , look for cheaper products , it should stop at such place , if , as was the case recently, German police took him back to his kennel .

When this young man said he saw this young neighbor like any other girl, he is credible.

Couples with mental disabilities, vulnerable people, are welded and moral couples. It is the relationship between man and woman seriously.

I met in the street a young man , disabled himself, who accepted his wife in his fits of nymphomania parte adventure seeking men. But he would never have a schedule adventure without asking permission .

All the couples I know mentally disabled are demanding and loyal to one another. It matters a lot to them.

That is why I take the story of this young man for cash.

This young man could have been accused of rape and sentenced to prison . It was held that the charge of touching .

This allows for a public distribution system sequences powers work:
- The girl was not entitled to rape. The touch only his social status and that of his family.
b- sentence extends the number of cases of operating reinstalling the slave called electronic bracelet necklace .

This necklace has been reinvented in the United States , the only Western country that experienced slavery on its soil. The Supreme Court has refused to condemn slavery law. He was sentenced in fact by the Civil War .
In 1995, there was still an American state with a constitutional right to slavery.

This necklace bracelet has been reinvented to control children, the first slave population of humanity. This trick Installation Restoration Project collar slave enough to say dishonesty .

Is the electronic bracelet is an American résugence the slave collar ? Yes .

This case is a perfect illustration of the current public mental patients :
1 - Serve broadcast powers without political consequences. Eg the charge of touching.
2 - Serve instead of confrontation without political consequences. Ex: the slaughter of student Marseille .
3 - To provide a forum for negotiations between the government and the thugs to install them. Eg theft from the apartment of a family of mentally disabled with the support of judicial police officers and public prosecutors .
4 - Serve as a sealant to the prison number. Ex: 30% are mentally ill Persons detained
5 - Serving putty to the establishment of new slave systems. Ex: The diffusion of electronic bracelet .
The mentally ill can , in complete silence the media, multiply uses, to prolong , to gauge tolerance levels and possible increases .
6 - Serve sealant expansion policy prohibitions .
a- In this case, it is possible to set up the devout policy.
b- Elsewhere, the eradication version of the drug that can be experienced without media or associations debate since the action is on the mentally ill.
Etc., etc., etc. .

This is only possible because the mentally ill have a special status in our societies become rare .

Children have the same public status. This is what makes the United States they are so abused by their equivalent state. This is also what explains the attacks carried out under American pressure for deletion, explicit or not, of the Ordinance of 1945 , which protects , because of the resistance and the France - free children from their ancestral farm by agents of the state.

This exploitation by agents of the state goes with the exploitatoin by civilians. In the United States , since the state officials pounced on children to fatten colleagues in the prison system and private industry carcréral in the countryside , the use of less than 15 years in plantations knows back into favor .

This special status is as follows. The mentally handicapped , even adults, are considered to belong of right to public power , because of their fragility. They are excluded from public life and public debates .

Therefore , everything that is done will never discussed them publicly as soon as they are recognized mentally ill, they pass under the stranglehold of specialists state. This is called Protection .

Women, indigenous people, soldiers , prisoners, received or still enjoy such protection .

At present , the mentally disabled are the only civilians who sucitent such a vacuum around them, such unanimity to entrust the state personnel as soon as they are recognized as such .

Officials, thugs and others have fully understood the benefits they can get to carry out their public strategies.

This in itself is a crime.

As with all "protected" , the field of sexuality is par excellence the land where the mentally disabled are at risk vis-à -vis state officials and civil predators. The principle is simple: as soon as they come out of the control of their protectors, they are considered at risk to themselves and dangerous to others . From there , simply dilute the sauce . QED.

This brings us back to Mr. Sarkozy that we never left .

It is not stated publicly pesonnes worthy of faith and it is easy to verify that Mr. Sarkozy has demanded a member that sucks for the grant and also simply because he wants it, it is a woman , as such, it is made for it. It is the executive branch that insult to women.


So we are in the same qualifying sex crime for the mentally ill . Plus other qualifications Sarkozy folder.

For the same type of qualification:
- has a mental disability that has no defense , despised by the judges , neighbors, cops, lawyers, ignored by the press, faces charges baseless to people who do not listen .
b- Mr Sarkozy is himself a lawyer , Chief Honorary State necessarily listened carefully by judges , well defended by his lawyers. It responds to anyone.

I think I have shown through my mail that the refusal to consider the information accusing Mrs. William not based on any legal reason . This refusal is based solely on the arbitrary.

I renew my request to open a preliminary investigation.

I also remember that there is the request to open a preliminary investigation into witness tampering by the leadership of the Regional Council of Ile de France . The public understands that this qualification interested judges .

Please accept, Mr. prosecutor , the assurance of my highest consideration ,


Marc Salomone

PS : Since July 19, 2012 , when the first request to open a criminal investigation, I had the opportunity to bring to your knowledge of police tactics to lure me into a trap .

Therefore , I beg you, Mr. prosecutor kindly check the following telephone numbers :
- 01,53,68,36,39 , 04,07,13 the at 11:05
- 01,70,70,24,79 , 31,08,13 the at 10:44 .
These people call , do not answer , cut .

The reverse directory says that this number is on the red list or business , for example the police .

I know from experience that it is through these trails that prepares police crime.