samedi, août 24, 2013

Strauss-Kahn, Sarkozy, identity and conflict, rape, and social justice issue

Strauss-Kahn, Sarkozy, identity and conflict, rape, and social justice issue
madic50.blogspot.com
d.50 @ gmx.fr



Paris, Thursday, August 22, 2013




Mr. prosecutor in Paris




Subject: Identities and otherwise, Mr. Strauss-Kahn and Sarkozy
Justice and social issues


Copy to:

President of the Republic

Prime Minister

Madam Attorney

Mr. Minister of the Interior

Mr. Attorney General to Paris

Mr. prosecutor in Lille

Mr. Fillon Honorary Deputy Prime Minister





Mr. prosecutor,

1) - Introduction

1 - Presumption and corruption
According to information never contradicted Mrs. William M. Sarkozy has used his ability to hold the government to crééer criminal activity of procuring, embezzlement, disqualification of Parliament, development of a parallel right to that of the Civil Code.

Jean Garrigues, Associate Professor of History, Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee and political history (CHPP), said during a broadcast C in air:
- "Do not forget that Mr Sarkozy is the man of action and it is one that continues to embody the principle of effectiveness."

In other words, Mr. Sarkozy could again contribute to the management of the public authorities. He would exercise the same function as that allowed him to set up this crime.

How can they justify the magistrates that Mr Sarkozy is not unaccountable justice on his own crime alleged and never wavered?

Who has the ability to confuse the presumption of innocence and the mafia protection that appears to executives as a useful adventurer?

2 - Comparison of two similar cases
In both cases of sexual crime can be made public by the Justice Strauss-Kahn and the Book of Mrs. William to Mr. Sarkozy, the comparison between Mr. Strauss-Kahn and Sarkozy is possible and instructive since both people are heads of state at the time of the facts and that they are being suceptibles criminal sexual practices similar. In both cases the base facts are paid sex.

The only difference between the two is that one is within the scope of judicial proceedings by studying a debate the facts, the other has a omerta which puts it out of the simplest judicial speech.

The following text is in line with the request for a preliminary investigation of the facts alleged by Ms. Guillaume to Mr. Sarkozy.

It examines the twist against Mr. Strauss-Kahn only from the point of view of the facts attributed to Mr. Sarkozy, in comparison with them. The procedure for Mr. Strauss-Kahn is not about my request, it just serves to enlighten.
1) - The Press
The newspaper Le Figaro published a study of the removal order corrections of Mr. Strauss-Kahn in the case known as the Carlton. See below

It is alleged that Mr Strauss-Kahn have:
Summer-a client of prostitutes,
b-Mis an apartment available for this purpose,
c-Sought to conceal the repeated relationships.

The Court will decide.

Title 1: Strauss-Kahn

1 - Strauss-Kahn never leaves the exclusive client activity.
He was not involved in any transaction that puts a prostitute in the service of a third party outside of its own thin parts.
b-If you rent an apartment, it is solely for his own parties and never to third parties.

2 - Strauss-Kahn does not prostitutes.
-What was the business to be presented without having to know their status, or that he himself participated in their recruitment Its relationship to the formation of these women prostitutes is the same. There was not involved.
b-He use, conscious or not, professionals who practice their profession freely and without any coercion from Strauss-Kahn.
c-When he or his colleagues, or both, come into relationships with these people for them to participate in a party, they are already shopping.
d-These women do not become prostitutes at the request or under any constraint Strauss-Kahn or his representatives.
e-Strauss-Kahn is the commercial standard of any transaction the relationship between the client and the prostitute.
f-Strauss-Kahn manages nothing the lives of these women, professional or private, out of the contractual relationship to their presence in the evenings and during the evenings. And, under client.
g-Strauss-Kahn does not derive financial benefit from the payment of passes. He did not shoot no more moral benefit other than the satisfaction of the customer. These prostitutes do not fit any definition of its government.

3 - Strauss-Kahn does not produce reports with pimping these ladies.
Strauss-Kahn denies having known the status of these women. We must take into account to trial.
Assuming he knew their status:
a-Being customer is not an act of procuring.
Said Marthe Richard law is specifically designed to liberate prostitutes pimps pemettre for their simple and direct commercial relationship with the customer.
It is to this end that the houses were closent and prostitutes have been on the street.
b-Having rented an apartment for the purpose of receiving it-yourself "candidates to consume" is not constitute a "material procurement act."
c-Rent or receive at home is not legally separate.
The holiday tenant is not least among them the tenant of the main housing.
d-If the tenant holding or indeed, an apartment is engaged in procuring receiving home, the prostitute's pimp receiving in his camionnete.
e-Criminalization of the place of practice of prostitution is to preclude it.
f-This prohibition is contrary to the law that allows prostitution.
g-This type of law that contradicts one hand it allows the other is the substitution of a statutory right to a statutory law.
h It is a violation of the sovereignty of the people.

4 - EACP lawyer, civil party headed by a senior magistrate, an advance order of the Supreme Court as evidence that renting an apartment for the purpose of fine particles in the presence of prostitutées is "a physical act of pimping. "
a-The judgment of the Supreme Court said that "a prostitute who lends his truck to a colleague could be seen as a pimp."
b-This would form a precedent.
5 - This case is exactly the opposite of the case Strauss-Kahn.
A-The prostitute of the Court of Cassation
a-The prostitute who lends his truck does not practice itself the commercial act.
b-In this case, it was probably considered organizing the occupation of prostitute beneficiary of the loan.

B-Strauss-Kahn
Strauss-Kahn does not rent an apartment to a third party. He rents for itself. For purposes of receiving under libertine libertines, alter ego, or, if justice established, under direct client receiving for himself a prostitute free to accept or reject the contract.

C-Legality
a-The law on prostitution is specifically designed to eliminate any organization association for a person who is a prostitute.
b-pimps are all those who contribute to the prostitution of another person.
c-The assimilation of the prostitute to pimp his own dishonesty is aimed at the prohibition of prostitution through the courts.
This is illegal and seditious because it is based on the substitution of administrative authority to the legislative authority.
c-This qualification pimping can not by definition involve commercial transaction between the client and prostitute. There is a free trade act that is defined between the professional and the client.
The d-commercial act does not set the installation of a person as a prostitute.
This e-defined use of the prostitute's professional status.
f-If there is confusion between the training of prostiution and commercial act of it, then:
- Customers of a company can be defined as associated with capital and management of the company.
- The direction of a garage can be complicit in the bank robbery with the purchased car to the garage.
This debate could become publicly tricky.

D-Jurisprudence
In any case, if the court holds the charge of procuring about renting an apartment, it can not do so by calling the cases cited by counsel for the EACP.

5 - The question is whether the contract between a prostitute and her client's criminal or contractual.

a-The relationship between the client and the prostitute is an ordinary commercial relationship:
In this case, the relationship is defined by the contract. Both parties are they free one vis-à-vis the other? The terms of the contract are met?
A free b-contractual relationship, usually assumes that the client has no right to the formation of the other Contracting Party.
c-This implies a legal distinction between the client and the pimp between the trainer of the prostitute and the beneficiary of the action of professional prostitution.
d-A confusion between the client and the pimp between the consumer and the capital could not not extend to all contractual business.
e-There must be a law of exception to limit this type of report only prostitution.
f-The only way to limit this type of report is to criminalize the client and to disqualify the civil prostitutes, to make minor incapable.
g-Make adults incapable minors is the enslavement of slavery.
h-I doubt that it's legal.

6 - Any lies Strauss-Kahn
 Potential lies Strauss-Kahn, if established, contrary to its assertions, would be:
-A parade was an obvious media activity concerning a public figure of this magnitude.
b-The-coup against the use of ambiguous laws on prostitution and pimping by the state. They are not produced by Mr. Strauss-Kahn. They are induced by the failure of legal officiants.
c-Being only the tenant is not a crime.
d-The only question is whether this apartment has been rented by Mr Strauss-Kahn for its own or third parties.

Title 2: Mr. Sarkozy
The previous discussion of the legal situation of Mr. Strauss-Kahn, as the press gives us to know, we can present the comparison of Mr. Sarkozy.

1 - Mr. Sarkozy as prostitution.
Ms. MPP did not come for prostitution.
She came:
a-Search for a grant to a public authority.
b-function exercise their member of Parliament.
It was Mr. Sarkozy who uses prostitution.
He is under the terms of all mackerel, all rapists.


These are the famous "I have sexual needs, it is not much, you can not let go. Etc.. "
The disappointment he felt at this act is a mark of the feelings of rapists. They are always disappointed by the rape. This is the fault of the sexual object, man or woman.
It does not only use his authority to rape the woman by forcing a sexual relationship that she does not want.
He uses them to establish a merchant contract: it sucks, it pays.
Mr. Sarkzoy sets in motion all the springs of putting a person into prostitution. This constitutes pimping.
He currently serves notice
b-It provides local
c-It provides the pretext
d-It organizes the life of the prostitute out of his commercial act.
Honorable member came for a grant. This is his life there.
Mr. Sarkozy is organizing the money transfer.
He made a pass as a prize which replaces the same amount, the grant.
Through this grant, the honorable member may exercise its function.
She is under prostitute. That's it pays prostitute.

He created an arm's length.
The contract is not free because one of the two Contracting bar on the other, forced the other to sign.

2 - Mr. Sarkozy lends an equivalent apartment in the:
-From a realization of prostitution
b De-financial benefits, moral and political, for itself.
Mr. Sarkozy provides the equivalent of the truck pass review by the Court of Cassation. And oddly, the perfect match to the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court does not interest the association in the case of Strauss-Kahn's misuses.
However, this place is not only the place of a password.
It is the place of formation of the prostitute and its dependence
This is a place that depends exclusively on Mr. Sarkozy, a shrine to his interlocutor dependence.
This is the place, as an instrument, he formed his interlocutor as a prostitute.
How could it be a physical act of procuring a case for Mr. Strauss-Kahn, and not the other, for Mr. Sarkozy?

3 - Mr. Sarkozy takes advantage of rape
As I have already discussed in previous writings argue that this request to open a criminal investigation into the matter,

For the rape, Sarkozy:
a-Rape and therefore enjoyed.
b-Use the Treasury to pay for a pass.
c-Lowers Parliament, the executive power.
d-Consolidate and empowers the right parallel to that established from the Civil Code, which exists in all state jurisdictions. It does not legitimize it gives the guarantee of the Head of State.
Mr. Sarkozy rape sex and Administrative without sex is only due to their distinct place in the course of formation of the parallel right.

4 - The right parallel
The existence of the parallel right

Baudis, The Advocate, said: "In France there are two competing rights: Freedom of expression and secularism"
Baudis creates a legal duality from wearing headscarves.
Mr. Sarkozy creates a legal duality from the rape of a member.
In both cases, it is to break the Civil Code and the Declaration of Rights of 1789 as the sole source of law.
Conclusion
I know from experience that the ambush of the police and refused to answer my questions specifically related to my status. The judges notice this status by the fact that I do not have the means to pay a lawyer. I remember that all lawyers contacted were discarded.

It is not well-founded or not my application is first examined, and it is my class.

Whatever the supported cause, theft, rape, torture, theft, citizens of certain social classes or populations considered by lawyers are treated as inferior judges as unworthy of civil or equivalent parts. They can not be qu'accusés. If necessary, flooring manufacture or endorse false for them to be. In the case of abuse of vulnerable people, lawyers recent take up the cause of the other party if it is supported by the police. This is massive.

I was raped, tortured, to cover the handling of the mentally ill in the formation of alliances between state agents and thugs.
I saw police officers:
a-Move to explain how thugs rob the mentally ill in their apartment by the Edf counter register their name,
b-Releasing thugs night along with their victims that they lynch,
c-Support rapists being violated because the fag is not a man,
d-Invite a thug in their office to beat their victim,
e-Constant production of falsifying public documents.

The police hearing on this application was sabotaged for granted when a defendant is the popular classes.

Workers, the poor, the disabled, meet the judges. The converse does not exist. I dealt with three times prosecutors legal action once in Grasse, twice in Paris. Three felonies, forgery of public documents, conspiracy. The Office of Criminal Affairs and Pardons being kept.

I remind you that since August 4, 1789, reiterated by the 1946 Constitution, it is unconstitutional and I renew my request to open a preliminary investigation.

Please accept, Mr. prosecutor, insurance Sincerely,

Marc Salomone

Aucun commentaire: