lundi, juin 10, 2013

Roselyne Bachelot, rape, Sarkozy, MP, social segregation.

madic50.blogspot.com
Roselyne Bachelot, rape, Sarkozy, MP, social segregation.
Google translation / The reference text is the French text

Paris, Monday, June 10, 2013



Mr. prosecutorin Paris



Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney



Sir,
1) - Notice of a MinisterRoselyne-bachelot, interwievée after its integration into the business of television presenter by journalist Vanessa Caffin, Elevator Pitch, provides a valuable contribution to our request to open a preliminary investigation.
It certifies that the politicians are not forced to "sleep." This status is reserved for "collaborators." Which formally contradicts the statements of Mrs. William that trivializes its information about rape it lends to Mr Sarkozy by smoothing technique: everyone does.
The statement was made after the publication of the book of Mrs. William. Neither Ms. Bachelot nor Ms. Caffin, can not ignore it or do not think about it.



Here is the discussion:On elevator pitch, Roselyne-bachelot Minister said:"Question:Is it necessary to succeed in the bedroom TV?Answer:- XxxQuestion:And politics?Answer:- "It is a myth for politicians. Yes, the politicians are very raisononnables women.There are girls who revolve around politicians and a number of collaborators who may have been forced to go to pot. ".
Ms. Bachelot said that "politicians are very reasonable," and only "girls who gravitate politicians ... collaborators ... sometimes ... go to pot."
This explicitly invalidates the claims of Mrs. William. For the latter:- "When you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. ". Bachelot responds too directly about it to ignore.

 
The title of the article suggests that net Bachelot wanted to say something about the relationship of politics and sex: "Roselyne Bachelot loose on politics and sex! "
It is not possible to confuse an MP with a "girl revolves around politicians" or "collaborator". Bachelot was Minister and MP, it does not sully the parliamentary way.
It is therefore not unreasonable to think that it is in proper form, a statement of recognition of the use of coercion in the case reported by Dr. William.
Implicitly, it is a qualification of rape for the action assigned to Mr. Sarkozy.
The request for a preliminary investigation made by Mr. Salomone is greatly strengthened.
cf. "Roselyne Bachelot loose on politics and sex!http://fr.divertissement.yahoo.com/video/roselyne-bachelot-se-l% C3% A2che-sur-110525768.html "2) - The judicial policy of segregationThe peacekeeper in charge of collecting the testimony of Mr. Salomone served him that the written text is constituted by what the officer wanted to and in no case that Mr. Salomone said.
This rage is the bubble surface that can not be explained by social segregation.
It is not possible to respond in writing to Mr. Salomone rape as an MP is neither criminal nor important. Therefore: It is returned to silence and provocation.
The basis of the legal segregation is repeated in a loop by all legal formula: "A matter that we do not talk does not exist. We will not talk about your case so it does not exist. "Authentic.
 
It is this formula that lawyers, for example, justify their institutional solidarity with the rapists of their own client. The forfeiture can be traced back to the Directorate of Criminal Affairs and Pardons and down until Parquet and headquarters since nobody speaks.
3) - Comparison of requestsThe dogma that seems to lead legal action is only part of the so-called "elite" population could validly sue.
See what it is.
A-Many business elitesWhen Mrs. William published his book, leading after the arrest of Mr. prosecutor Mr. Salomone, a series of court procedures, directly or indirectly, Sarkozy is underway. Or: business: Tapi, Zakiédine, Bettencourt, Karachi, campaign accounts in 2007 and 2012, etc..
These cases have nothing in common with the request of Mr. Salomone. The release says that they will end with a judicial defeat. They have all the characteristics come from the "elite".
Then they are taken into account by the court, what they superior to questioning by Mr. Salomone?


B-featuresIn none of these cases judges can not produce direct, irrefutable evidence of any guilt anyone, let alone Mr. Sarkozy.
Without taking any part in this business, I have noticed that judges provide the means to investigate on the basis of accusations that lead themselves to any evidence ordinarily accessible to investigators.
Investigators can not receive these accusations as facts and information to be verified. They must believe in the first place there are corroborating the allegations made and secondly it is possible to find evidence.
C-The application of an ordinary personWithout prejudice to the conduct and outcome of any of these legal proceedings that do not involve his approach, Mr. Salomone has nothing to be ashamed of a comparison of the merits of its lawsuit with those called "the elite. "
Mrs. William, a trustworthy person, product information on criminal acts. Mr. Salomone request verification of information that is verifiable in the ordinary conditions of work of the investigators.
5) - The variable adjustmentI know the contempt which governs reading my writings.
This disregard does not in any way the subject matter:a-It is not because he is Mr. Sarkozy, a major character, Mr. Salomone is sent to sabotage or silence.b-It is exactly the same when asked magistrates to consider attacks on mentally ill by ordinary thugs.
As follows:a-Salomone has no right to drive, if the judges decide, the indictment of Mr. Sarkozy.b He has no right either to lead to the indictment of perpetrators of mentally ill live Cotorep.I was tortured for making compensation offers these vulnerable people without it costs nothing to the Treasury. The prosecution will go up in solidarity with civilian thugs so they do not pay the compensation decided by the court.
We, weak or vulnerable people are the variables adjustment negotiations servants with the rabble. We see all the consequences.6) - ConclusionThe judicial negligence leads to that the mentally ill and a member are in the same subordination of violence thugs, the arbitrariness of the executive and judicial silence.
These people have the right to judicial review of matters affecting them. I know that if I do not insist that the criminal acts mentioned are reviewed by the courts, it will not do on its own. I insist.
Thanking you,
Please accept, Mr. prosecutor, the assurance of my highest consideration,


 
Marc Salomone

Aucun commentaire: