Sarkozy, equality before the law and the judiciary duality

Sarkozy, equality before the law and the judiciary duality
The reference text is the French text
Madic50.blogspot.comD.50 @ gmx.fr
Paris, Monday, March 25, 2013





Mr. Prosecutorof Paris



Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney



Subject: Principle of equality and duality law



Mr. Prosecutor,
1) - DevelopmentsTwo court decisions and a television directly relevant to the request for a preliminary investigation that I made.a-19 March 2013, the Paris prosecutor's office ordered a judicial inquiry against Mr. Cahuzac.b-March 21, 2013, a judge of Bordeaux, the Indictment says Mr Sarkozy for "abuse of weakness".c-The March 19, 2013, issue C in the air holding a debate on violence in Marseille.2) - The purpose of the analysisI want to show the duality created by legal action alleged Mr Sarkozy include:1 - In the public mind of this action, as the testimony of Ms. Guillaume, as well as press reports. This explains the omerta that covers this action.2 - In some public violence.She is qualified as such by representatives of legislative and executive powers concerned.3 - If the judiciary does not name these things according to its own procedures, it will eventually impose procedures to reading these facts outside his authority.
Title 1 - Jurisprudence
3) - The casea-The two lawsuits are mentioned case law on the principles of legal action.b-The magistrates seize themselves without facts:- Request for third- Giving in to the opposition by the police put the collection of testimony requested by the prosecutor.c-The judges bother to interpret facts are not undisputed.d-The judges disregard the serious consequences of public policies and legal action.e-Judges retain the possibility of a statesman, Minister of the Interior at the time, of abusing his personal capacity with a vulnerable person to achieve their goals.f-Mr Sarkozy said that these lawsuits will not interfere with his political career.
4) - The principle of equality1-The questiona-The action taken by Mr. Salomone is organized from a unique whose accuracy has never been challenged by anyone and whose verification is easy.b-It can not be opposite one principle of discretionary prosecution is based:- Or: the quality of the person- Or: the seriousness of the consequences of such a public examination.c-It can not be said that the remarks made by Mr. Salomone are unlikely while with the qualification of "abuse of weakness" judges acting by a similar qualification.
d-The refusal of the police to take the deposition of Mr. loyally Salomone can not be accepted as an obstacle to the opening of a preliminary investigation.
2 - The responseUltimately, the only explanation for the rejection of the request of Mr. Salomone is its social quality.The request of Mr. Salomone is rejected due to a legal doctrine organizing the separation of French law according to their social status. The Judge Salas researcher gave the statement in an article in Paris in September 2007. There was there a breach of equality manifest. What is unconstitutional.
5) - Work on the testimony of Mrs. WilliamJudges can they still rely on the silence of the person raped? This silence is the subject of a social construction which Mrs. William is the notary.
1 - Mrs William said herself that sexual enslavement of women is the rule of political relations between men and women.- "I wanted to talk about the relationship between a man of power and sex. The scene exists, but it is universal. This is perhaps the only scene from the book that is not violent. It is trivial. This elected cares, she has seen others.Ouand you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. "Cf. Le Nouvel Observateur, 7/24/12
2 - Mrs. William takes here the old woman and the identification of "sex". The woman is a "person of sex."
3 - Mrs. William takes the trouble to point out that this scene is "perhaps the only scene from the book that is not violent. It is trivial. ". The non-violence of the scene is motivated by the fact that penetration took place in a port deemed consent.This lack of violence apposite qualifier away with rape gaze on this action."Celia Marie-Guillaume said it, get away with such cases by distributing a pair of slaps .. "Why respond with violence and not speaking to an action" not violent "?
4 - It is a protection afforded Mrs. William M. Sarkozy against evil spirits. A kind of condom that prevents verbal information meeting justice."They did such a hay against the book they have promoted, plays Celia Marie-Guillaume. In their place, I'd rather treated with contempt and silence.A the end of the summer, I started to write me funny, like a satire ... 'This ideological device which establishes the fact of rape as entertainment is a mere cog in the ordinary operation of this crime. A sort of dry ink. It is taken by the press. This is a code. Depending on whether or not laugh, it is "in" or "off".
5 - This scene could reach the sky would be qualified rape parcequ'elle usual "trivial." It is so ancient it is legal. The argument here we want to establish ourselves as the source of the legality of this action is simply one of the custom.
6 - This argument is not only accustomed to Stop qualification public rape and condemnation that accompanies it.Mrs. William unearthed a right and staged in opposition to another.The custom here is a right, customary law. This right here is a right against another law, the Civil Code.
7 - The installation of custom as binding law also serves to prohibit the prosecutor to intervene. This occurs only because of a constitutional right, writes, which is separate from customary law, unwritten.
8 - The fact that these protections and prohibitions are a form incatatoire, imprécative, magic should not forget their effectiveness. Esoteric form, we are witnessing the creation of a legal duality. It is this duality that is based the work of Mr. Sarkozy, subject to verification of undisputed facts.
9 - This democracy of droit de seigneur "trivial" who "rule by a pair of slap" continues in all sorts of forms of organization of democracies. United States judges recognize that men are couremment violated by superiors, civilian or military.
10 - We expect something else today a female senior, and feminists who voluntarily silent, than to divide people into two camps raped, and that of those who have in the pants or underpants and accordingly distribute 'slapping' saving, and others who deserve their fate. It's back to the thought of the guard; mecca of feminism.
11 - As The school boat, and many others, it could be that the lady called to account in 10 years. But supporters of legal duality are answered. In advance, they disqualify potential complainant "Ouand one is a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. ". Connoisseurs will also read filigree another great classic rape refrain: If she (he) does not understand the joke, it's a shame for her (him).12 - Incapable, and cold fish fault, this member is well recognized as custodian of all public attributes of a raped person.
13 - Mrs. William does not merely report the facts. It builds impunity of some and the fault of others. She also participates in the information outside naughty and daring to broadcast a right archaic and fundamentally slavery.
14 - The application to open a preliminary inquiry that necessarily entails a formula I work on the testimony of Mrs. William to get the facts about the legal relationship between people
Title 2 - The duality of rights and crime
6) - ConfusionRape attributed to Mr. Sarkozy, if the facts are accurate and unchallenged, is organized as an institutional confusion of two rights, one legal, the other mafia criminality and two, one civil, the another official.
It does not include the crime imputed to Mr Sarkozy by the testimony of Mrs. William if you do not understand the implementation of this legal duality.
This is not an aberration, it is an administrative and judicial policy.
The rape public Elysée reveals claim this right so far underground to become a source of law in itself. Just as the law of the Civil Code.
7) - The law of dualityI think I have established in my application to open a preliminary investigation, that the facts alleged against Mr. Sarkozy are producing a double right to the moment, a product of official codes, the others is illegal, surreptitious, unobtrusive.
In the short term, each of these rights and equal playing pourait to produce codes of equal public value. All kinds of legal codes do not have their source in the Declaration of 1789 just waiting to be implemented.
The production of a private law entangled in the legal right has already produced a judicial fact, if not unique, at least rare. In the case Tapie, judges return to res judicata. A year ago, we were told that the review of res judicata was obviously impossible. The reason for this investigation the judicial work is precisely that this trial was conducted according to codes other than official codes.This is only the beginning.
This is a fight between two producing lines of legality in the State is engaged. One of these lines, constitutional, respects the principles of indivisibility of the state. The second line replaces the principle of indivisibility principle of plurality of references formed out of the constitutional principles.
It is a central element of the crime alleged that Mr Sarkozy could not run without admitting a dual legal system, reference right inside of the exercise of public law.
Keep out of the legal debate Crime "public sector" is to build a public criminal law which intertwines public law legal now.
8) - "C dans l'air" issue of March 19, 2013Tuesday, March 19, the day of the release is legal for Mr. Cahuzac, issue C Air was devoted to violence in Marseille.
This issue marks a turning point in the public debate on crime and delinquency. For the first time, it is clearly established that certain public and civil works with crime organized crime by some officials.
We are no longer the individual corruption of a few individuals or small groups, famous Ripoux.
Now civil crime seeks to become a recognized partner of public authorities. The thugs do not just manage a sector artificially demarcated. They want to participate in legal control of public space.
Mrs. Samia Ghali, Senator, Mayor of the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille, asked to send the army in the neighborhood of which it is elected. This stems from the recognition of the existence of two or more, competing sovereignties. We are no longer in trouble public order within the same sovereignty.
You can also link the murder of a teenager by a policeman who was not in service at this perception of confrontation of dual sovereignty. The failure of public authorities to put into words the realities led the junior staff of the State to place their analysis in the imagination, or dementia.
"Mal name adds to misery of the world" Camus said. That's what he is.
As in the analysis of a certain type of crime, judges will stick to qualifying settling of accounts and pass coverage rights, the phantasmatic solutions call in the army and shoot the ghost of a nameless enemy will spread.
This issue of violence in Marseille shows that the vocabulary of State control over all reality. The participants in the program C in the air to acknowledge.
That the facts alleged against Mr Sarkozy tells us is that there is no logic to the lost sheep back to the flock by a shepherd whose vigilance has been deceived in a moment.
The alleged rape of Mr. Sarkozy implies that he does not recognize the powers of the Republic as the only Powers. Marseille's thugs either.
The Judge Salas researcher invokes reason opportunity to prohibit a worker to request a judicial accounts executive. This is topical order today that judges examine crime frames.
What is new is not the corruption of cadres. It is the ability of this corruption to redefine the relationship of government to civil crime.
Which is characteristic of this program C in air is that the participants are convinced that these kinds of components of a new type are winning their bet.
9) - CourageDuring this program, Ms. Samia Ghali, Senator-Mayor, tells the story of a 10 year old to stand up to thugs who want to assign a status mafia. To break it, he has been naked in public.
Children fight to be violated to remain integrated. Judges do not risk anything. What do they do?
10) - as the legality issue.When Mr. Sarkozy involves the Legislature, it indicates that the challenge to debate the definition of public authorities.
This type of coups aims to establish multiple legalities included in the regular operation of law and order.


For example:a-A reception at the Elysée and the Grant Application by a Member of the Head of State. Drag rape in the conversation allows slightly redefine the relationship between the powers of the Republic, to assign the role of women, to codify certain administrative reports to citizens.b-A child who brave the local private administration. Drag rape in the conversation of the staircase can:-Ensure a rule of private lawb-Remind everyone to orderc-Manage unit in relations with those who are currently representatives of public power is not shared.
Inevitably raise the question of the unification of all these legalities. Inevitably, the strongest impose their version of law and unity.
11) - ConclusionThe claim by Mrs. Senator-Mayor Ghalli the arrival of the army at Marseilles based on the observation of the clash of two dominant sovereignty.
The Minister of the Interior regularly Valls said he moved to Marseille "another order, an order in place of the republican order."
I do not draw any conclusions about the question that I submit to the attention of the prosecutor of the Republic. I simply note that the authorities qualified the legislative power and the executive power perceived in their respective fields the appearance of this legal duality.
Rape attributed to Mr Sarkozy by the testimony of Mrs. William subvertion is the universal law by a special law. It is the same desire to make the legality under the Declaration to specific legal ideologies that aspire to leave their marginality obscure to erect in law.
It is interesting that Mr. Prosecutor brings everyone to the simplicity of the indivisibility of the Republic, the legal exclusivity of public administration, respect for others.
The request to open a criminal investigation gives him the means.
Please accept, Mr. Prosecutor, the assurance of my best regards,
Marc Salomone