Preparation for the convening of Police, March 6, 2013

Preparation for the convening of Police, March 6, 2013
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Proposed testimony on the request for a preliminary investigation on the facts alleged by Ms. Guillaume about Sarkozy.
1) - requests to Mr. ProsecutorThe text of 12 November is the founding text of the request for an investigation jurdictionnelle.The request was made by two comprehensive texts dated 19 July 2012 and 27 July 2012.It was followed by a series of other whose only purpose is to develop specific aspects of this case.
This application is a reflection. It can not be fully apreciate without the study of texts that founded and texts that clearer.
This text is only an abstract of the arguments of this application.
2) - The factsIn a book in May 2012, Ms. Guillaume said that Mr Sarkozy has an MP obliged to give him a blowjob.He was under stress and with the usual vocabulary of sexual abusers.The alleged incidents took place at the Elysee Palace during a reception for the medal ceremony. The member has been abused between the decoration of the Prime Minister and Ms. Austrian Balkany.
3) - RapeRape is proved.Blowjob under duress, moral, material, physical, is legally rape. It is considered such by the French and American jurisprudence. As evidenced by numerous cases in 2011-2012.Strauss-Kahn in New York, Camaret France, school by boat, reports of rape of minors, etc..all these trials include oral sex under duress as rape. ,
Mr. Sardozy used his authority, his power to demand satisfaction of the member, the weakness of it (so declared by Mrs. William), to get a blowjob.
 I use the term "suck" or "bite" to place the story of facts in the mind of the abuser.A sexual abuser, there is no fellatio or woman. There is a slut who sucks a dick.Here, we take the public vocabulary, that of justice.
4) - The accuracy of the factual reportMrs. William reported facts. The Chained Duck the resumes. At the same time, Canal + had a debate on this issue with Mr. Balakany, UMP. Le Nouvel Observateur published an article.The Chained Duck has never been taken in the absence of background information false or only poorly received.Setting personal cause of Mr. Sarkozy is obvious. Personality of this level automatically tuned favorable judges if it makes a complaint. They do not accept the implication Free personalities of the state.
Neither Ms. Guillaume, nor Chained Duck or any other newspaper have been no libel on the part of the person concerned. The latter having used the French to let pass any judicially notice about it.Mr Sarkozy has no public protest High to overturn what Ms Guillaume. He has made no denial or complaint.Mr Balkany, MP does not really reversed the facts. He just said it was a "treat" and meant he had to stay there. What the journalists obeyed.Here, Mrs. William M. Sarkozy staged a crime.We therefore believe that the report of the allegations may be required to factually accurate.
5) - The characterization of the factsA-GradeThe qualities of rapeThe honorable member comes to funding. She will get the result of this "treat" in the words of Mr. Balkany.It follows:a-Rapeb-Prostitution. The grant comes in payment of a sexual act which is then a password.b-Pimping. Sarkozy is the organizer of this implementation prostitution of a woman and the beneficiary of the transaction.Procuring c-hotelier. Mr. Sarkozy provides local permits this action.d-Conspiracy, if the honorable member was placed there intentionally.e-Diversion of public fundsf-Subtract taxes.Politically-BMr. Sarkozy rape a woman who is a Member.The rape took place while Mr. Sarkozy is running. It is therefore under the Head of State, Head of the Executive Power.Member of the same part in the reception to get a grant. It is necessary for his city and for his election. It is in the exercise of its functions.It is therefore against Mr. Sarkozy, the representative of the legislative branch.
From the moment Mr. Sarkozy isolates that member to exercise it on a particular violence in the context of its duties and functions of the member, the two protagonists are characterized each by their respective functions consititutionnelles.
Mr Sarkozy realizes thus:a-rape of a womanb-Rape of a Memberc-rape of the Consitution
Administratively C-Mr Sarkozy did not act randomly. He acted intentionally to lower the parliament and publicly express the préhéminence the Executive.He has organized a parallel right to public law. Double legality.We find the use of this dual legality or lawfulness Mafia inserted into the legality public in various administrative practices.Sarkozy has somehow given the backing of universal suffrage in practices that are no longer made but may then require to become public law.Mr Sarkozy is engaged in operation of government organization.6) - AmnestyThe first argument refuge behind which advocates public Sarkozy is presidential immunity.This argument does not hold here.1 - Immunity very popular in the 90s was beaten by brêche worldwide.Almost all states become democratic guarantees on return they granted immunity to dictators that they leave power2 - The French justice does not recognize the immunity of African Heads of State for simple cases of common law called the "ill-gotten gains."How can she hide behind immunity chance not to consider the facts of the same nature for Mr. Sarkozy.These facts are of the same nature as they are common law crimes heinous that institutional consequences.3 - At the time of his arrest, Mr. Strauss-Kahn also enjoyed immunity as Head of State, under secretary of the IMF.4 - renouncing of his own, this immunity, Strauss-Kahn showed that Mr. Sarkozy may well explain voluntarily before the court if it considers that this is baseless and slanderous.5 - Recognize immunity for rape, it is creating the droit de seigneur.This is a feudal law. As such, it is unconstitutional since August 4, 1789.
7) - The legal situation personalitiesa-Salas, judge researcher, developed in Paris in October 2007, the contention that the action of important personalities can not be considered by the court in response to requests made inquiries of those conditions Social modest. Indeed, ordinary employees can not understand the facts of which they speak and subjecting them to the magistrates they carry a considerable twists personalities involved. When they are paid, the evil would be done.
b-The facts refute such reasoning. Almost all politicians convicted, including those who have been in prison, could find a chair elected every time they are shown. There is no connection for the public between a conviction for common law and an inability to stand.
c-By asking that Mr. Sarkozy meets Justice criminal acts attributed to him, Mr. Salomone does not undertake public career of Mr. Sarkozy if these acts are wrong. They are true, it will indeed tell what title he claimed again become the guarantor of the proper functioning of the state. This debate will be the least of it.
8) - The procedurea-If necessary I'll speak to the Constitutional Council and the European Court of Human Rights and the Council of Europe.
b-If the judges want to be a lawyer, just as Mr. prosecutor instructs the BAJ give me the total AJ.

 Marc Salomone