Sarkozy, Strauss-Kahn, procuring, jurisprudence

google translation, the reference text is in French

Paris, Monday, January 28, 2012



Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney
Your Ref. 12/00 282 (quoted in all correspondence)
N. No. : -1 - Wednesday, July 4, 2012. Article Chained Duck.2 - Thursday, July 19, 2012, article in the Nouvel Observateur.3 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor.4 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.5 - Friday, July 27, 2012, Addendum.6 - Friday, July 27. Letter to the President of the Republic7 - Monday, November 12, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor8 - Monday, November 12, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic9 - Thursday, November 29, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorCopies to the President of the Republic and the Minister of Justice Ms.10 - Monday, December 3, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorCopies to the President of the Republic and the Minister of Justice Ms.









Mr. Prosecutor
1) - Preamble
The newspaper Le Figaro on Thursday, January 24, 2013 reported the reasoning of the judges of the Court of Appeal of Douai to make their Judgment in the case known as the Carlton.
This reasoning enables them to validate the qualification of "Pimping aggravated by an organized gang" as defined by the magistrates of Lille in this case.
I do not prejudge the value of this reasoning to the case of Carlton. For cons, I find that applies fully to the alleged rape case involving Mr. Sarkozy and Mrs. William reported by the Canard Enchaîné the media.
2) - The reasoning
A-libertine"" ... Besides the testimony floods professional who participated in the evenings. One, "Jade", speaks of a "real meat," the other room "bestial" in Washington and "pure sexual consumption". Judges do not deny then recall the statements of the former minister, who assured on record that "the libertine implies consent and mutual pleasure ..."B-Place",,, This is one bachelor cards charge -" the act of procuring equipment, "it is written - which believes that DSK" put these places at the disposal of evenings sexual in the presence of prostitutes he knew the business "for benefits paid from 500 to 1000 euros,,,"C-Network",,, Judges crossing was a step further, saying that DSK would not have been a mere beneficiary of these fine parts but had" largely initiated and promoted by knowingly implementing a system based on complacency in his immediate environment in order to satisfy his sexual needs. " They recall the testimony of a young woman claiming to have been "selected" to meet the expectations of the former IMF chief, three trips to Washington in 2010 and 2011 "at the invitation" of this last remark of One of the participants about the politician: "It is the leader who loves us no less girls,,,."


D-The instigation",,, The atmosphere in the small circle often two together business leaders and a police around DSK is thus described:" He moved around a powerful man with a small circle national destiny relational playing on the secret to maintain its privileged character and flattery. "And the judges concluded:" The programming of these evenings was not only in terms of its availability calendar. He left no message without response, boosting even his trusted (Fabrice Paszkowski, the business manager of Pas-de-Calais, with whom he exchanged numerous text messages, Ed) (...) expressing his desires (...), launching options or requirements on the representation of women.,,, "The Court of Appeal therefore held Douai founded indictment of Dominique Strauss-Kahn as based on "serious or corroborating evidence." »»2) - The alleged rape of ElysiumI demonstrated that the alleged rape of the member is also an act of prostitution. It is based on the practice blackmail by the grant. It at the end of the exchange became first an act of sexual payment delivery.
This service sexual, if it occurred, is rape because the consent of the member can not have existed, for reasons both personal and institutional.It can not be accepted that a woman came to get a grant of right to accept pass for a slut in public.It can not be accepted as the representative of the legislative consent to subside before the representative of the executive power.The betrayal is not an element of consent.The representative of the Executive Branch can be argued to have a representative of the corrupt Legislature to legalize a maneuver of lowering it.The representative of the legislative branch can not argue his cowardice, his corruption, fear, to legalize lowering it to the executive branch.Representatives do not have powers, they wear out.
3) - Are there had pimping?The judges of the Court of Appeal hold four criteria to establish pimping.
A-Distinction of prostitution and debaucheryJudges resume the test of one of the protagonists who asserted, on record, that "libertarianism implies consent and mutual pleasure."
Member of the same can not be consenting, or by chance or by institution.It may have taken a "common pleasure"?

A man is the center of the world up that day. He passes her, hailed, said: suck me. He drives in a separate room, opens his fly, drops his pants, pulls out his penis, is what it takes to put an erection. For his part, she accepted the proposal before an attentive crowd composed of senior executives will review it during his tenure. It follows that man. She sees him bare his lower abdomen, exhibit his genitals.He stuffs her live in the mouth, she opens her mouth, she sucks, she wanks, he takes the lead, he enjoys in her mouth, she must swallow.He advised that he has not enjoyed as it should. She is qualified publicly kleenex.Then she sees the CASH to get paid.a-First question: The fun has it been shared?b-Second question: The question was asked?We know the answer by the remarks made by the alleged abuser. It requires a technical service to women. He must empty his balls emergency. At no time, it establishes a relationship of complicity and pleasure. They do not have one to another old friend of licentiousness who want to organize a transgressive perfomance. As these couples who are "it" in the woods, the local garbage, the streets deserted. The risk of being seen to be taking the challenge to face the world, then make fun party.There no such thing. Pleasure is programmed as one-sided. A disservice to the other. Member of the same obeys an injunction, shot Whistle.The other is that "it" was not terrible.As stated in the Assize Courts a young soldier rapist and killer, in a meeting, "I have not even enjoyed! ".Discontent vis-à-vis the imperfection of the action and the frustration it causes are inseparable seizures of persons for sexual purposes.The attacker must be unhappy not to establish between himself and the person providing force collusion pleasure. By putting in misconduct, the attacker places attacked in the position of having to justify its inability instead to speak about the assault. At the same time, the offender shall serve the abused, he owes him nothing. He kills, he pays, in any case, it separates.
So we are not in debauchery. It's good to constraints imposed by one and not granted by the other mentioned.This is a contract for prostitution and rape as this contract is imposed by force that is manifested by blackmail and abuse of authority. Rape of an element of the legislative branch by an element of the executive branch is the main object of the action.
B-PlaceMagistrates Douai characterize providing a place of prostitution as a criterion for pimping.
Setting prostitution that member does not anywhere. It takes place at the Elysée.This is so because this place is in itself a device for some constraints, domination and power to another.Placed between the choice of conflict with the Head of State or of a subsidy and can be re-election, MP yields.For this capitulation, Sarkozy chose a place where he identifies himself with the whole of the State of France, the Republic, etc..The face in this place is hitting the French Army. It may impress many. How many men are thus passed under the table?
C-NetworkThe judges also retain Douai implementation of a network that selects the prey.It is impossible that Mr. Sarkozy has challenged this member by chance.It was put there to do his number. He knew she stoop she would morally and technically knees.The network brought him meat on the table. He no longer had to be used.
D-The instigation.The network does not act on its own initiative. To drive a represents the Legislature to suck the local representative of the executive power must not only order but also guarantees a condé.Only the Head of State can offer this guarantee of impunity and want such an operation.To this end, it seems inevitable that he has formed a circle of cronies.
Mr Sarkozy is the instigator of this operation.
E-DefinitionWe see that, subject to the accuracy of the reported facts, under the legal arguments of the judges of the Court of Appeal of Douai, in the case known as the Carlton, Sarkozy has engaged in an operation rape of a woman, a member of Parliament, the Constitution. He did according to the criteria used by the judges as being part of pimping: Prostitution, providing a place, building a network, instigation.
4) - The response of the State executivesThe Chained Duck of Wednesday, January 23, 2013 reported about the prefect Jacques Simonnet.


It has certainly made a false cover for the building permit dispute Mr. Drucker. The latter had the possilibité this license at its close links with Mr Sarkozy, Minister of the Interior, then Head of State at the time.Asked by the newspaper on the false, the Prefect Emeritus replies- "Well, the memory is not infallible, and the human species as well. Even if you write that I perjury, that does not prevent me from sleeping. ".1 - We are the strongest2 - A finger.I met this air response in all circumstances. Note that I am one of the weak and vulnerable populations. That explains it.
5) - Equality before the law
Mr. Strauss-Kahn and Sarkozy form a homogeneous population justiciable. The executives of the Head of State level.
They enjoy the same legal powers, the famous notament immunity. It should be noted that the only argument the court to dismiss New York Mr. Straus-Kahn's request for immunity was that he himself had refused to call in the first instance.
It is unlikely that Mr. Straus-Kahn could make that argument at trial. The case Assange highlighted that governments no longer consider diplomatic immunity, such as embassies, as intangible.
In my previous mail, I have long reported the abuse uses of the term immunity, France. Even when these abuses tend to disappear even in the Third World.
The sexual escapades of Mr. Straus-Kahn took place during his tenure and because of it, as shown at length the stop Douai. This is strictly the same in both cases, Mr Sarkozy
Therefore, it is not possible to recognize rights that Mr. Sarkozy the same judiciary does not recognize Mr. Straus-Kahn. Both were of the rank of Head of State enjoys immunity afférante at the time of the facts in causes.
There would be a violation of the principle of equal rights of litigants.

6) - Hic Rhodus, hic salta.Several ongoing legal cases concerning Mr. Sarkzoy.a-All involve the notion of total immunity.b-Karachi, Bettencourt, campaign costs, the Tribunal private Tapie case, all are the responsibility of settling of accounts within the ruling groups of the state.c-interpretation is the engine of the conduct of such investigations. It will depend in each of the balance of power between the ruling groups.
Unlike the case on which I draw the attention of the prosecutor of the Republic is:1 - On the one hand the simplicity of the facts.a-They are true or false. If they are wrong, we do not talk anymore. If they are correct, the crime is proven.Their b-audit is a matter of simple police. It is not in any state secret.2 - On the other hand, in the position of Mr Sarkozy in his confrontation with the question of justice.It is not a flow of power and decisions of which he is a pawn and he can discuss his participation.Here, he answers directly from its acts of man. Person other than he committed his alleged misconduct. Not even his possible accomplices.He wanted to establish the response of the judiciary to any delinquent act. If he was a mental patient who imposed a pipe to a girlfriend Service schizophrenics, he would be on trial.This provision applies to himself as to anyone.
7) - ConclusionIt is not enough to answer that:a-One is hunted by the U.S. government when the other is under his protection.b-The applicant party's Judge Salas populations genetically incapable of dealing with public life.c-The alleged rapist is a higher class.
Subject to the accuracy of the facts reported publicly and never denied, even by the person concerned, there have been a rape, a woman, a member of the Constitution, a Member of prostitution, pimping, public finances deception.
Justice must investigate the matter.
Please accept, Mr. Prosecutor, the assurance of my greetings Regards,
Marc Salomone