Bartolone, justice, corruption, mafia

Paris, December 5, 2012 wednesday

V. No. :Classification Opinions to the October 9, 2012No parquet: 12221000175Complaint / denunciation dated April 6, 2012 theAgainst XFacts: Other than criminal casesClassification OpinionsExamination of this procedure does not justify criminal prosecution on the grounds that:"The consequences of the fact that you complained are not sufficiently serious for the prosecution considers necessary to judge your case on the criminal. 'However, you can enter the civil court to claim damages.You can challenge this décidion of ranking purposes by sending an e motivated and accompanied by a copy of this filing to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal. '
N. No. :a-Application to open a preliminary investigation, April 6, 2012b-Call classeement unanswered, Friday, November 16, 2012


Mr. Attorney General,
I have the honor to communicate to you the memory of Appeal announced by November 16, 2012

Title 1: First Prev examination. P.2-3Title 2: The reality of judicial demand. P. 4-12Title 3: Facts public and "insufficiently serious consequences": P. 13-16Conclusion and PS: P. 17
Title 1 - First review
1) - The illegality of textI request a review of the legal value of the text of Mr. Prosecutor. It has obvious legal flaws:
1 - Mr. prosecutor uses a catchphrase completely unsuitable for the application concerned."The consequences of the fact that you complained are not sufficiently serious for the prosecution considers necessary to judge your case on the criminal. 'Mr. Prosecutor responds to a question that question.There is nowhere relief sought.
2 - There is no application to criminal judgment because it is not a complaint. This is a request for a preliminary inquiry.This is a magistrate Nanterre exposed me there is a difference between the two. It is therefore.The prosecutor of Paris said: "Your letters," not your complaint.
3 - The text is a signed informed gribouilli which is most likely not due to Mr. Prosecutor. There is no delegation of signature indicated. Yet it is signed. However, this text is not an argument administrative type. It is a decision of the prosecutor in person. There is not his name, nor probably his signature.
2) - Recognitiona-The prosecution does not dispute the facts,By this formula "The consequences of the facts ... are not sufficiently serious "Mr. prosecutor implicitly recognizes that my intention is undeniable.
How would it be otherwise? Submissions to the attention of prosecutors are analyzes press articles or books, which have been the subject of any complaints which are themselves built on the verification scrupulous and legal facts reported.
b-The prosecution did not dispute my analysis or my requests. It simply talk about other things and answer other questions.




3) - ConclusionThe complaint that Mr. Prosecutor class without following is a pure invention on his part.
There is no complaint. It is not a question of judgment. It does not discuss the facts or analysis.He does not decide on the application before it is submitted.The text is probably not signed by the prosecutor in person, or legally in his name.
That's a lot of mistakes to create the forensic evidence the classification of a request to investigate a case of corruption and mafia association.
I request the review of the legality of this text.


Title 2 - The reality of judicial demand
Mr. Prosecutor invalidate the artifact. On what basis?It does not on the basis of a factual dispute, he notes, but on the basis of an estimate of the severity of their consequences.
As the facts as reported are necessarily imaginary, I will return the facts and analyze the concepts of "consequence" and "insufficiently serious consequence" applied to them by Mr. Prosecutor.
1 - The material facts2 - The logic of the refusal of the application3 - The arguement of "consequences."
1) - The Materiality of facts
A-The facts and the lawThe request has not occurred on the "consequences" of facts but on their materiality.We do not need to give the consequences of drug transport to denounce it.The neighbors do not need to wait for the ranger enters the house he is eyeing to report it to the attention of authorities. Etc..The facts reported are inherently criminal acts. These facts constitute the manufacture of a criminal social structure.There is evidence that the alliances of politicians and businessmen that operate on mutual support, promoting a particular right which is the well-known right "brothers" are alliances known under the general title of alliances mafia. They are themselves a potential criminal consequences.That these consequences are to come into action or effect or delay does not affect the criminal form such alliances.
What is happening today in Corsica is the "serious consequences" of alliances between politicians and businessmen that are formed several years ago.The judges will wait until they such alliances have gangrenné throughout the Region Ile de France, or any chamber member, to act? As they did in Corsica.
The facts have already been studied in the application of 6 August. I refer. By cons I would return to them from the prosecution process to invalidate this application.

B-The facts and reasonsMr. Bartolone links with this wheeler is not circumstantial or friendly. These are links work, business, career. On both sides, these people are interested, including financially.
It is not a friend who finance the anniversary of Mr. Bartolone is a must.It is not a friend who uses the premises of Mr. Berda is a partner.Intervening with Mr. Beregovoy, Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister to save the company from Mr. Berda, Mr. Bartolone has not simply asked the state to consider the fate of a company difficulité .Mr. and Mr. Bartolone Berda established there a pact.I ask the court to tell us if it is a corruption pact.That is why I request the opening of a preliminary investigation.
It seems irresponsible to rely on "consequences", present and visible, these actions clearly corrupt to classify the request without result.It is typical of the corruption without being constantly "serious consequences" to each of its events.
If the standard of judicial intervention is that it must notify the public. This is an avant-garde design of the mixed state. This is the kind of mix that led the N'drangheta Palermo to Milan, and now Frankfurt and Marseille.
Birthday Mr. Bartolone is not a friendly appointment. It is a professional appointment. Mr. Bartolone would not have the financial means by itself. Mr. Bartolone not organizing this hop to celebrate her birthday. He took advantage of this anniversary to access a world in which social status does not entitle him.
It is Bac +3 and commercial framework, in a world where you need to be bac +5 and Great school to qualify for a major item. For the reception, it can eyeful to people who usually despise.
If Mr. Bartolone made a career with money from businessmen, not only with his political capacity, with the program and the importance of it for the people is that he wants to do, he will be obliged to the policy of his supporters real that racketeers.
For the reception, probably among others, Mr. Berda assured Mr. Bartolone access to circles that cater to national leadership positions, and not just local. In this sense, Mr. Bartolone to his position as President of the National Assembly as Mr. Berda.

What in the name of justice refuses her request to Mr. Bartolone account of his relations with businessmen?
This should have been done since July 7, 2011, on the anniversary of Mr. Bartolone. He was then President of the General Council of Seine-Saint-Denis.
This is even more important, urgent somehow, when Mr. Bartolone is President of the National Assembly. It is the 4th or 5th character of the state. How can we accept that it does not account to the justice of the whole relations at least potentially mafia?
It is justice to discharge or not.
C-The times are changingLet's face it, relationships Berda Mr. and Mr. Bartolone are character, logical mafia. It is now impossible to ignore reports of a politician and a politician wheeler that describes itself in the language mafia reports "brothers."
This term is a legal term of a law other than that of the Civil Code. This is a legal concept which derives from the mafia thought. What movies have popularized the gangsters in some population changes nothing. Mr. Bartolone is not a keumé cities.
There was a time when a great writer could describe his sodomisations little boys Algeria, as a challenge to the established order. Today, it is the way the court office. Take a woman by force to submit to conjugal duty, a right formerly, rape today. Joke between pear and cheese pretty bare legs in shorts Scouts became random.
Corrupt politicians, luggage tickets, fake jobs, the arrangements between friends with the IRS, etc.. These practices were the wasteland relationships dangerous politics. A game and a rite of passage.
All this was a regular social transgressions. Since the 80s, the case in Urba political corruption, water has flowed under the bridges.
Mr. Bartolone can stubbornly maintain that style of politics that now because he does what it takes for him to make no reproach. He could do it quietly because the Seine-Saint-Denis is a department where the UMP and Socialist parties agree on a common goal which is to distribute the items among them.

Until the goal is not achieved, there will be silence on the methods of socialist Seine-Saint-Denis. As there is silence on the methods used by the elected right Hauts de Seine.
In this anniversary, the Head of reception, the real host is not Mr. Bartolone. This is Mr. Tapie. He comes to pocket 450M euros from taxpayers because of the consequences of a decision by the Minister of Finance Mr. Sarkozy. Socialist deputies present were all taken publicly vehement stance against this measure. Mr. Bartolone serves as a bridge between Sarkozy and Socialist leaders. He would not have done it without the receipt. It should express themselves politically and was swept away. This is Mr. Berda which allows him to get to level discussions between people of rank government Ump and PS.
It is also for this kind of services that the State executives are silent on the sources of income of Mr. Bartolone. Because it is good source of income for unreported income. This is part of the issues to be addressed by the preliminary investigation.
It is this silence that the prosecutor shoots there is no "consequence" "serious". It is said that there is still little French relations executives businessmen in Corsica. Today, it is the motion for battle against "drift racketeer" Corsica.
For the moment, intense mafia, the famous "porosity" thugs and elites has not yet become a political issue in Seine-Saint-Denis. One day soon, as Corsica, the French discover the "insufficiently serious consequences" alliances of policy frameworks and legal blindness.
2) - The logic of the invalidationThe argument of "serious consequences insufficiently" seems a simple remark circumstantial. There is nothing.
Mr. Prosecutor incrit is a series of logical principles. We will study one after the other.1 - blood test2 - The social criteria.
1 - The question: Is there blood?The issue of "serious consequences" required the commitment of legal action is not circumstantial. That is, for years, the logic of relations executives State to the public.
In the police reports to citizens "serious consequences" resulting in "Is there blood? ". If there is blood moves. If there is no blood, it does not move. I have been witness Province and Paris.
A report on pedophilia shows a pedophile crisis that moves successively to his psychiatrist, psychiatric emergency hospital in a police station. In all cases, the answer is the same: Go to act first and then we will intervene. We will not do anything until you do not have abused a child.
Mr. prosecutor does not affect the principle. As depravity frames do not have political consequences should be doing nothing.
This cycle of the resignation of the state is endless.
2 The social criteriaThe second logic behind this formula is the social logic.The magistrate x-researcher gives the keys in his speech to the newspaper Le Parisien.The judge said a-right uneven, feudal, or colonial census.- DENIS SALAS, magistrate and researcher *"NO comment on the action of Marc Salomone, it seems important to remain very cautious about the use of criminal weapon, including termination. It seems dangerous to make a referral to the judge for a popular action, that is to say very much open to any citizen, there is no filter, the risk of lead to what I call the penal populism. The information has a perverse effect. Just look at the number of those who have ruined the lives of some people. How denunciations result in a non-place! But the damage is done, since the charge, once released, remains as a stain. 'Interview by A.-C.J. Le Parisien, October 2007.
Note: The word "fundamental" when used in a way that does not mean, as in this case, means that the author is an administrative addresses other administrative. He noted that the text will be used to purify the administration of a foreign clans recognized by the cliques in place.
This doctrine "fundamental" tells us that:1 - There is a second class citizen.It is defined by the words "popular" "any citizen", he can not enter into the judicial sphere if one "opens widely" the "referral"2 - This is a citizen Monsieur Jourdain crimeIt "ruin the lives of some people," he "denounced" without reason, He "evil." He "defiled." It is "populist." It is "anyone". It is "dangerous."3 - We must fight: It is the "filter".Formula prosecution is applying a policy of both social segregation and subordination of policy to crime. It is only when the population is reached in the flesh by the crime that pesonnel State is, or purports to act.
Under the pretext of an evaluation of "consequences", "serious" or not, a crime is a conspiracy to distance moved.
4) - The argument of "consequences"1 - ProtectionMr. prosecutor did not deny and does not refute the accusations about relationships mafia. He says they would not have "insufficiently serious consequences."He does not even deny that there are "consequences" and can be "serious". It just says they are not "enough".We are in the protection priori.Indeed, these facts have not been judicially established. How Mr. Prosecutor can he judge their consequences?We simply ask us projetter in the future, the time of "consequences."These future consequences can be spent discovering the consequences in the future. The effect of "subprime."Making their victims to come due to the "serious consequences insufficiently"?
2 - RecklessnessM to the prosecutor's action agreement between a politician and racketeer has no consequences "sufficiently serious."
We are talking about under the control of bloodshed in Corsica, Marseille, and mainly for the moment. It is neither the king nor the Silver-eccentric people who are directly responsible. It is primarily and directly because of the corruption of State officials first, then the action of thugs. Since these killings and the dissolution of the BAC Marseille, facilities magistrates take another direction.
By referring to the "consequences" of unproven facts, Mr. Prosecutor seeks not to establish. That's why he postponed our look after. He shows us the moon that we do not regard the earth.
3 - The actors madeReferring to the consequences of their actions and not fact, Mr. Prosecutor wants to lead us elsewhere, beyond the facts. Why and where?
I will examine the legal debate suceptible "serious consequences" contained in the acts of each of the players in this action.
A-M. BerdaB-Mr. BartoloneMr. C-prosecutor of Bobigny
A-M. BerdaMr. Bartolone is not the manipulator receipt. It is at this point, a puppet.The Project manager is Mr. Berda.
Mr. Berda can not say disinterested patron of politics. If this were the case, it would remain in France to pay the taxes due from it for the French activities which relate his fortune.
This notorious racketeer, tax exile in Switzerland, enters into a relationship he knows mafia type with which a politician has asked at least once a service critical to its business. Mr. Prosecutor good credit is a moral man who went into exile in Switzerland to avoid paying taxes due,
Mr. Prosecutor strikes us that the "consequences are not serious enough." That he knows?What this tells us that reception is not an operation of money laundering?What were the consequences of this reception in the affairs of Mr. Berda?What is the relationship of the normal business wheeler and elected?
Judge Salas researcher stated publicly that the demands of the people of lower rank are messy for people of higher rank. Apart from this feudalism, on behalf of which the magistrates they are subordinated to the administrative doctrine of "brother"? Everyone knows that it is a language mafia.
B-Mr. BartoloneMr. Prosecutor invalid request because it does not happen in France, hinder a personage of the state to the demands of a anyone.
Mr. Bartolone has not the means of receipt or policy that goes with it. It is neither technocrat, nor a son of technocrat or equivalent.
His relationship with his godfather Mr. Fabius present policy "door gun." Mr. Hollande, first secretary of the Socialist Party speaks of it as a "little guy from 9-3".Master these reports are very common in home classes in graduates. In a trial of Assisi, cf. Lechien case, the defendant's life survey has revealed that he had been persecuted in the normal school teachers because his father was a "concierge" These comrades were to mark the meanness of his extraction torturing the social .
And we wonder why the difficulty in France into the 21st century.
So to overcome real social handicaps that Mr. Bartolone decides to pursue a policy career based on luxury, it can get up to those people who hold the key positions of power and who despise him.
To this end, he seized the opportunity of a service request from a contractor adventurer. He joined with him in the logical relationships "brothers" and reciprocal services.
This is the type of industry historical penetration mafia state and local authorities.
Teamsters unions American truck drivers, have left invade and control by the mafia wanting to pay the very real problems posed by the opposition of employers to syndicatx. Including the use of armed provocateurs. The Mafia has rid the provocateurs employers. In "consequence", these unions have become one of the main points of the mafia anchors in civil society. They are the bane of the 1960 Minister of Justice Kennedy. They are one of the reliable sources of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1964, and the candidate Bobby Kennedy in 1968.
I do not epilogue, I think the judges know the "serious consequences" of this case, criminal ramifications, better than anyone else in France. On what, Mr. Prosecutor, you said that it Tchernobyle cloud prevents crime once again France?
Mr. prosecutor tells us that these facts were not sufficiently serious consequences. Mayor Sevran in 9-3 asked the mobilization of the army to simply allow its citizens to live in safety.
What allows Mr. prosecutor to be sure this is unrelated crime policies "fraternal" reciprocal services, Mr President of the General Council?
M. C-prosecutorThe prosecutor of Marseilles emphasizes the phrase: "You should know not to push a file at any price."The judge spoke of Corsica, France, why would it be otherwise in the 9-3?In this case are involved personal relationships of executive networks with local justice networks elected officers of the same territory.
Qelle is the impartiality of the prosecutor of the Republic when dealing with issues concerning the "brother" of the elected "9-3", which "brother" becoming President of the National Assembly probably sees him himself as the "brother" of the President of the Republic.
Is it only by blindness Mr. prosecutor responds next to the question and judge "insufficiently serious" consequences of a strategic alliance, career, between a racketeer and a politician?
Blindness or appreciation judicious balance of forces within the state?


Title 3: Facts public and "insufficiently serious consequences"
1) - CorsicaIn few clicks on the Internet we find this reference:http://grincheuxmarrant.canalblog.com/archives/2012/03/23/23836682.html
All witnesses the actions of the State in Corsica said that the State had refused to worry about corruption, profiteering, drift alliance of politicians and businessmen. As a result, two ministers of justice and interior, just move in Corsica to supplement the failure of the State.
Here are two examples of facts deemed insufficiently serious by the prefect and the prosecutor:
1 - Example MinisterialOn 11 September 2004, the Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry at the time, Mr Sarkozy, also had his "brother", Jean Reno, the prefect of Corsica Lemas. It was forced to hand it gives prefect for a building permit in an area unbuildable. This time it was refused. But we know that commercialism is the main reason cited by both Ministers in what they call "drift racketeer" and now "Mafia" of the island. We are in violent crimes.
Here are the details of the conversation without "serious consequences suffisaments"
   Jean Reno: I filed a building permit Bonifacio.
         Cécilia Sarkozy: Really?
         Jean Reno: Yeah.
         (Voice Anonymous - probably Cécilia Sarkozy): It will become a mansion, you'll see. Will you and us ...
         Jean Reno: Voilà!
         Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking to Jean Reno: The Prefect ... Then? You know, John?
         Jean Reno: Yes, of course ...
         Pierre-René Lemas: We took care of all building permits ...(The actor raises his arm on the shoulder of the officer)
         Camille de Rocca Serra: So, so, so ... Anyway!
         Jean Reno: No, but all is well, all is well ...
         Camille de Rocca Serra: Until you get angry!
         Pierre-René Lemas: But no! then, speaking to Nicolas Sarkozy: We'll talk later.
         Camille de Rocca Serra: You know, it is with us now ... Corsica more than him ...
         Pierre René Lemas: Camille is angry with me ...
         Camille de Rocca Serra: You have to see the movie too ... Corsica more than him, you can not know ...
         Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking to Camille de Rocca Serra: Yes, that's what I was told Christian ...
         (Voice anonymous - probably Jean Reno): Ah, then you'll see ...
Certainly, the intervention "insufficiently serious" the Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry at the time did not directly "serious consequences". It simply served to legitimize all actions "businessmen" in real estate.
2 - Example judicialThe judiciary is subject to the whims of this profiteering supported by the elected representatives and the Executive. Reflected in the turnarounds of the Administrative Tribunal of Bastia:
February 28, 2008, the Administrative Court ordered the suspension of Bastia permit filed Jacques Séguéla.On April 17 the same judge, Lucette Erstein rejects the application for interim relief filed by ABCDE. She justified in the name of "the presence of elements of new law and new explanations."The only novelty is that Sarkozy, Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry, became his "brother." He needs to make a name in the world of Showbizz, glitter, artists.
The Minister of the Interior Valls said that the President of the Republic, François Hollande, asked to examine the "causes" of disorders Corsicans. Compromise and submission of state institutions to the reality of the integration of the corruption in the state is one of the main causes.Instead, as if nothing had happened frameworks involve state myth "money" and the ghost "population". It does not eat bread, they will not respond.
Among the "serious consequences insuffisement ': 18 dead in annnée.
2) - Mr. Cope

A-identityMr. Cope's interest in our discussion is that it has the same characteristics as Mr. Bartolone.Mr. Cope is a former Minister of the Budget, Secretary General of the UMP deputy.Mr. Bartolone is Past President of the General Council of Seine-Saint-Denis, MP, Speaker of the National Assembly.
Mr. Cope, as Mr. Bartolone, chose a mentor for Financial accompanied in his social and political.
 Mr. Bartolone called "brother." Mr. Cope named him "friend." In both cases, the fréritude amitude and are shared by the other.For both, the brother-friend pay for access to a world they would not have access without assistance.
In both cases, it is stated loud and clear that there is no discussion of money, interest or corruption between brothers-friends.
There is however a remarkable difference.
In one case the court investigation in another class file it. The same, the same.
Mr. prosecutor uses subterfuge to take no further request for an investigation on the relationship of Mr. and Mr. Bartolone Berda.
Within a matter not directly related to Mr. Cope, judges Renaud Van Ruymbeke and Roger Le Loire prenennt initiative to examine the relationship between Mr. Cope and Mr. Takieddine a racketeer Lebanon. French justice wants to check if this part of friendship is not large enough to leave room for gifts of all kinds, including hard cash.
Mr. Cope denies any involvement in any crime whatsoever. This does not différenment Mr. Bartolone. But Mr. Cope, it is not enough to stop the action of the magistrates.
This change is a simple change judicial scrutiny. The questions asked by the judges to motivate an investigation are the same as those raised by a reflection on the anniversary of Mr. Bartolone. Y did he corrupt, mafia organization, criminal penetration of the state, forming a criminal network in the state, to what extent?
B-Omerta discriminant
We see that the two categories of omerta executive networks. Those who benefit and others.
It is not the ritual distinction powerful and miserable. This distinction it concerns types of frames of the same rank.

To the same criteria, the judges rank executives see their records or Constrain be interested. This is without serious consequences, without the characteristics or criminal, for some, is at least suspect for others.
As follows:a-Mr. Cope is paying a visit to London by a boss, the staff money it is "sufficiently serious." Two judges are hunting.
b-By cons, for elected officials and senior staff employees, the Regional Council of Ile de France who are paid four days in London on a lie professional expense of the taxpayer, the judges describe the facts and "do report any criminal offense. "
If it is, as claimed by the Judge Salas researcher, not to jeopardize careers by accusations risky, what twists Mr. Cope made by this legal initiative is any less important, or more important, for the political capacity of the latter than would be the opening of a preliminary investigation into the association information concerning Mr. Bartolone Mafia?




























Conclusion:In view of what is happening in France today, the judicial response to Mr. Prosecutor is indaptée and Third World. Cover turpitude elites is a distraction that the French no longer have the means, mainly due to leaving cover too.
It's fine to give public lessons in civics Corsica. To the public insult. It is still necessary that the State officials, including judges, give another face of the state as seen by Corsica, for example.
I beg you to please respond to the request for a preliminary investigation. You can not suspect Mr. Bartolone be less able than another to answer the questions of the judges and investigative police officers concerned.
Please accept, Mr. Attorney General, the assurances of my highest consideration,

Marc Salomone

PS:1 - CowardiceWhen I informed the senior civilian applications preliminary initiations that I filed, I told them that I'm too alone, the answer is always the same.a-- Ha! Sarkozy? Bartolone? It's tricky. Must search all the evidence. Otherwise, they can sue. It's very complicated.The best response I've had is that of an international lawyer specializing in the complaint declared against Heads of State. They are all black and African.Question phone in 2007:- "Master, I filed a request for a preliminary investigation against Mr. Sarkozy. The press says that you have experience in the complaint against Heads of State. Can you give me some information?- Response:Ha! Is this you? Excuse me, I have a plane to catch! 'Sénariste a film would dare produce this replica.b-There is little, a left-wing editor:"Ha! Sarkozy! Bartolone! It's tricky ... Excuse me, I asked! '
2 - Attached is the text of the August 6, 2012