corruption, legal inequality, Sarkozy, Strauss-Kahn,

corruption, legal inequality, Sarkozy, Strauss-Kahn,
madic50@blogspot.com
d.50 @ gmx.fr
The reference text is the French text


Paris, Friday, July 18, 2013

Madam Attorney
The care ofJean-Louis GÉRAUDChief of Staff

Can corruption and unequal treatment some



Copy to:

President of the Republic
Mr. prosecutor in ParisMr. prosecutor in Lille
Mr. Fillon Honorary Deputy Prime Minister


Mr. President
While the prosecutor of the Republic of Lille called for a non-place, the "Action Teams against pimping 'Association, civil party in the case of Carlton Lille, asked the judges to Dominique Strauss-Kahn returned to the criminal court for "pimping" and "concealment of pimping."This associative action creates unequal treatment, as well as civil court between two cases of the same type: the case Strauss-Kahn and Sarkozy affair.
Both are Head of State at the time. Both enjoy the prerogatives attached to this function. Both are publicly concerned with questions about the legality or criminality of their relationship to women, paid or not.
Chapter 1 - first characterize each of these two cases for the part that concerns us, that the public handling of the case.
1) - Regarding Mr. Strauss-Kahn:
A-New-York1 - There is no escape in with the law. There are reports all public sexual actions.2 - He has not been sentenced in New York by the American justice.
B-Regarding the case of Lille1 - The FactsHe has a need to establish linkages between times, places, people, actions, and various disparate.b-Without these connections, there is no charge. The band, if it exists, is a prerequisite for the action, if it exists, and this action is necessarily plural.c-The actors are consenting. That the action is legal is one thing in debate, the actors are volunteers is established.d-Except to say that some people, such as women, are major miners forever. But in this case I must say precisely.
2 - The legal actiona-Three judgescomplete b-Instructionc-request dismissal by the prosecutor in Lille.
3 - The presence of the hand of the U.S. government is credible:a-Strauss-Kahn has been charged in Oxford when he wanted to give a lecture at the invitation of students. This happening Oxford stinks organized provocation.b-It is not a coincidence that the request of EACP comes as Strauss-Kahn joined the Supervisory Board of the Russian Development Bank areas controlled by the Russian Rosneft oil, linked to Russian Plan.
c-For reasons I do not know Mr. Strauss-Kahn is personae non scratched in the American vision of global frameworks.
2) - Regarding Mr. SarkozyA-FactsHe operates in a confined space, in a unit of time, place and action.b-It is likely that it is supported, the member did it was not by chance. But these devices are possible complicity in the action. They are not logical.c-The action takes place entirely in a spin between Madam Deputy and Mr. Sarkozy.d-The principle is that the constraint is that the honorable member.e-The State is abused.
B-Public actiona-The legal action is summed up Mr. prosecutor with a request for hearing Salomone by police. This hearing was deliberately sabotaged. She could not take place.b-Other: Nothing.
C-protectionThe feature of this case is almost oath made by all media informants did not seek judicial extension of their information.
D-TapieWe can compare the media action in this case the action or Médiapart World in Tapie.Where journalists are as collaborators because of prosecutor and the Financial Police.
E-Immunitya-The prosecutor request a hearing. It was sabotaged certainly, but it has been requested.b-journalists, media, associations, etc.. are not affected by this so-called immunity.c-I have demonstrated the futility of this.
C-FeministThe EACP is not alone in doing so. The deafening silence of feminists on the Sarkozy case relays their din in the case Strauss-Kahn and collateral actions. This silence is clearly orchestrated.
Chapter 2 - examine the issues raised by the intervention EACP association.
1 - The associationThe purpose of this association is not targeting prostitutes and pimps individuals. Instead, the association aims to become a European and global.
Therefore, when a writer like Mrs. William reported the rape of a member at the Elysee by setting prostitution of said member, the EACP should be interested in the first place.
But it is not.
2 - Mr. CharpenelBut EACP can not claim ignorance of the debates.
One of the Vice-Presidents is Mr. Charpenel. First it is the Attorney General to the Court of Cassation.
It is both:a-Very committed prohibitionist action, especially in the prohibition of prostitution.b-Very active in the judiciary which he is a heads leaders.There is no novice in the judiciary or in activism prohibitionist.It is necessarily aware, and his colleagues in the Supreme Court and its associative co-leaders, the book Mrs. William.He knows the facts and he knows exactly qualify.It is not outrageous to think that he has already discussed with both colleagues and the Court with his comrades of the EACP.It is conceivable that he knows the request of Mr. Salomone.
3 - The legal factsIn Strauss-Kahn case, the prosecutor asked the dismissal. Given the complexity of a case where nothing is obvious, given the personality of Mr. Strass-Kahn that you can not bring to being a pimp, you can expect that a senior magistrate let work colleagues and decide.However, the association co-chaired by Mr. Charpenel contradicts the prosecutor and request removal.The lawyer made by cunning arguments. The prosecutor described the logic saying it amounts to "proceed by way of affirmation, not demonstration."

4 - set associativeThe association does not want the attention of the court on various activities of prostitution.She wants:a-criminalize any relationship with prostitutesb-To condemn a man knowing that this sentence has no consequences disproportionate to the offense would be charged.
In other words, it is war.
Chapter 3 - The manipulative logic
Maybe, but then why the silence in the case of Sarkozy? Why not duplicate this intransigence?
1) - The public distinctionWe could speculate that this absence. By cons, we can very well analyze the effects of the combination of the absolute silence and the intense chatter.
The co-chaired by Mr. Charpenel chats matching the case of Strauss-Kahn association. Mr. prosecutor Lille requires the dismissal stating that the disparate facts of this case do not link Strauss-Kahn pimping. The EACP asks judges to override. She wants a conviction of Mr. Strauss-Kahn.
At the same time, the same association whose vocation is universal response completely ignores a case of rape, prostitution, hotel pimping, tax fraud, personal enrichment, violation of the Separation of Powers, for Mr. Sarkozy. But this case seems simpler and more relevant than the first.
The associative action appears to be a facade. Behind her, through it, it makes a distinction between public business of the same nature, that of Mr. Strauss-Kahn and Mr. Sarkozy.
2) - The unequal treatmentThe double movement of silence to Paris and Lille chatter is a public judicial directive and gestures. Through this association, it creates a bias in the public public legal debate.


While this bias is to the detriment of Mr. Strauss-Kahn and the benefit of Mr. Sarkozy. But it is based on unequal judicial treatment of all French.
 Equality is not to form a uniform legal action. It is equal attention from the justice to the same case. In this case, two heads of state can be rightly suspected of problematic sexual relationships with women because of the influence of their authority.
4) - The orderingIt is plausible that the same cunning public intervention, association co-chaired by a senior magistrate in a court case has consequences. It is even logical to think that the intervention was made for it.
The EACP of M.Charpenel does not occur for the sake of contradicting the prosecutor in Lille in the Strauss-Kahn affair. It intervenes to put an order in interventions for persons of the rank of Head of State or chief executive of the state.
Strauss-Kahn, yes.Mr. Sarkozy, no.
5) - The potential for corruptionA bit like in this system of communication through gestures from time, or a game of pool, the trial of Lille and the silence of Paris make it clear to the magistrates of Paris what decisions they make. At least if they ever want to go to the Supreme Court. This decision can then be taken independently.
The study of this association relentlessly uncovers a judicial manipulation may well identify with a form of corruption.
At this point I must proceed by logical deductions. But lawyers for the EACP they proceed differently to establish the guilt of Mr. Strauss-Kahn? The whole is to assess the usefulness of the proposed understanding of the facts we have deductions.
ConclusionHow long the Paris prosecutor suggest he going by his silence that covers the actions revealed to the public by Mrs. William and he yields to the pressures and prejudices?

I simply request the opening of a preliminary investigation into allegations of rape of a member. The information having been made by a serious person and taken up by credible persons.
For much less than that, Mr. Strauss-Kahn, and the rank of Head of State as Sarkozy at the relevant time, is the subject of a formal investigation. This investigation of the facts and homogeneous people is decided by the judges of the same continuous area of ​​justice than those who refuse the requested investigation concerning Mr Sarkozy.
This distinction is: In whose name?
Please accept, Madam Attorney General, the assurances of my highest consideration,

Marc Salomone