Meric, Esteban, Far right, Antifascisme

madic50.blogspot.comMeric Esteban Far right AntifascismeGoogle translation / The reference text is the French text.10/06/13 

Sacrificial martyr and propitiation
 1) - The order of prioritiesIn Meric case, it appears that there was no assault, calculation, will to fight, endangerment of others, hatred, from the Skinheads. 
1 - First, they refused to engage in a fight that was imposed on them for two reasons:a-They did not come to fight but to buy clothes like antifa.b-They did not see how their interlocutors claimed the permanent opponents function after hours of political aggression sessions.c-They measured their physical superiority and they have informed their provocative. 
2_ Instead, they were attacked, provoked, forced, to fight.They were killed by those who claim a "antifa" group led repeatedly skinheads.The fact that a provocative or death does not change the order of priorities. 
3 - The behavior of skinheads before the altercation in the shop, says that these people do not work according to the criteria of hate.  
The hate that justice must examine the presence and consequences is not the rage that is mobilized in the circumstances of the fight.In law, it is a proof, at least a serious and consistent index. 

2) - The priorities of the "antifa"The so-called "antifa" students: 
a-Assaulted verbally violent skinheads.- 
They would have kept comments such as:"We have recognized you. You do not have interest to buy a lot of bags. We are waiting outside. ".
Mr. Meric quoted as saying: "These are people who should not even be alive. "
 b-Prepared aggression. 
The leader had boxing gloves in his bag and pushed his comrades to organize a fight. 
c Built-stress combatVerbal abuse took place in the apartment of sale. 
The "antifa" skinheads then waited at the exit. 
On several occasions, they refused and circumvented the requirements of dispersion of security guards escorting a step further creating an obligation to fight.
 d-They denied the authority of the security guard who ordered them to leave the premises and from the site.  
They created the field of battle and set a moral liability to fight for skinheads.That's a lot for supporters of law and democratic order outraged 

3) - Mr. Meric is visibly frail. 
 His image attests. He is recovering from leukemia. His body is unable to absorb the blows of a raging battle.
 This visibility of its fragility was served by his interlocutors also refused to be as enemies.It's his own responsibility that is part of an action whose main purpose is physical violence on others and with others, so as to oneself.It is not forbidden. He attacked.
It is not a victim, he is a workaholic.It is not self-defense. It is a vigilante.
Mr. Meric is not in this fight because he is caught in a wind of madness that sometimes blows in a public place made up of young people. As the output of a nightclub after a drunken night out.Mr. Meric is this because he is enrolled in an organized research activity of violent action.This search for the violence inherent in the project form the membership of this group. 
It is united by the research and eradication of demonstrations of what they call "fascism." 
We will see that door is another name, that of Evil.
It is this research that made him refuse the public authority vested in the vigil. 

4) - The Evil 
The "antifa" which belonged to Mr. Meric are not only students who face physically opposite political camp, with what it leaves opportunities for confrontation and degassing of hormones.
All students generations have this kind of mobilization. They are university substitute gangs neighborhoods.The activity of these groups is a new ideological orientation in France. Their fascism has only distant relations with the political opposition to fascism and democracy.They are not fighting for democracy. 
They fight against an ideological reality in itself a social object, fascism.  
Their sole purpose is to eradicate physically fighting its members and events.  
This Fascism opposes nothing. There is an evil in itself. 
This is because it is actually fascism political and secular face of evil, the manifestation of Satan, the "filthy beast" to be driven from the land.They develop a religious vision of society.   
They are kind of Satanists who will hunt down the evil, the evil events for the scare.  
This fight is everywhere and in every moment. Interviewing activists inevitably find references to hunt vampires of Hollywood series.
Violence against people thought to embody the evil is necessary and inevitable because these people are possessed by the devil and that it is their body eradicate this evil presence to the whole society.The skinheads are human beings, certainly, but they are possessed by evil, the devil.  
They are slightly different from men in that they are demonic beings.  
They must be defeated to restore full power of good and thereby the security of society. Hence the need to stay put instead of starting.This movement, in lay out, is actually steeped in religiosity. 
The issue historically for all these movements is as follows: After, who's next? If the far right is defeated and returns to hell, who else will be designated as the embodiment of evil? 

5) - Standardization
 Formula M. Meric, "These are people who should not even be alive," all fags heard it.
This is the formula by which the combatants invest right to eradicate the enemy is an enemy of mankind.  
Must not only eliminate an enemy force. 
We must purge society of evil that can grangrener society. These people are abnormal. Eliminate cost to restore the standard of living. Purify is secure life.We can not say that Mr. Meric "died for his ideas" and ignore those he expresses. The least we can say is that we are not blinded by the evidence of their anti-fascism. 

6) - The martyrdom and sacrifice 

A-MartyrIt is apparent that Mr. Meric was after the announcement of his death as a martyr ringfenced.  
This death, this one or another, was expected by some as divine sign guiding errant messengers. It was also expected by others as a signal for action. Technical old state policy. Historical examples abound.Any prose about this death is a climb to the altar, the cross, the holy place. Even since we know that it is the small team who assaulted Mr. Meric skinheads, they are necessarily the "aggressors". This is wrong.Social tomb Mr. Meric must be the source from which come to drink all the anti-fascist forces to leave and go back to fight against the vile beast, evil. The miraculous fountain of French left yet officially secular. 

B-SacrificeThe martyr Mr. Meric must respond just as religiously, the sacrifice of his pseudo-aggressor. 
The question is not whether there is guilt or not. Guilt is a "social acquis". 
The question is whether it will be possible to give the judicial route all its repercussions in the eradication of evil, aka the extreme right, aka fascism, aka making will follow. 
The sacrificial procedure should be the epicenter of a redeemer fascist tsunami.
He must destroy the extreme right, break the right rein in the left. The sun will shine again. 

7) - Social vengeance 
1 - A man is dead.  
Mr. Meric. Son of two academics, law professors, student at Sciences Po. 
Already noticed as a future executive officer.Its presence in a violent movement, masked, at least heedless of the law is not a moral handicap. This is his commando course. It's good for the CV if you have the paqrcours. 
2 - A man is responsible for his death. Esteban. 
He was dressed for the four seasons by the scholars of the far right:- "This is a young idle.  
The lumpen proletariat radicalized. With peers, they do not form a public intellectual (capable of intelligence). 
 There are no seminars. They engage in all kinds of actions that neither you nor I have the habit of doing. These people can not be party cadres. "Close ban.b-We later learn that Esteban is probably only his name and not his name. 
He has no right to the name, as he held the title has no right to show his face. Before being convicted, he was already unfit to be a man.It's feudalism.
3 - Mechanical ideological argument develops a social conflict between a radical left, but at Sciences Po, and a radical right, but the proletariat.
In short, citizens are left and Democrats.  
The proletarians are right and fascist. 
When Mrs Thatcher said that "General Pinochet saved democracy" she said, with just a step ahead, that French academics and journalists can finally say today. 
Thiers also said documents supporting the workers of the Paris Commune were prolific offenders.The time must have seemed long to academics. 
This long detour respect proletarians before finally returning to the fundamentals of hatred and contempt. 

8) - Justice
1 - The social racisma-Justice sets the named Esteban charge. 
a- The press, social racism, do not give us the name. Remember that this is just unconstitutional. Justice is public.
 b-He is accused of manslaughter.
To make sure he goes to jail, we first put it there automatically. 
Everyone knows that judges cover illegal sentence custody by an equivalent penalty.It is an abuse of power. 
2 - Inequality before the law
The girlfriend of the man is under investigation for "complicity" of violence causing death. 
This poses a problem of law. 
It is said that Esteban is the only guilty of manslaughter, either.  
The trial rule. 
By cons, from the time when we speak of "complicity" everything changes. 
It has been established that it is the "antifa" which caused even more controlled and organized, the stress of the fight. 
They did so:a-Offensiveb-Convening groups outsideb-Rejecting the authority of public vigil.How can it determine justice "complicity" without considering that opponents of Mr. Esteban? 
This would not hold that the only "complicity" of the girlfriend of Mr. Esteban retain the thesis aggression nice fascist skinheads attacked by evil fascists. 
Person can no longer hold this view.
Either Justice sticks to the qualification of complicity in the one person of one camp.
In this case, there is a clear violation of the equality of all before the law. 
Either justice examines the legal responsibilities of all those present.  
In this case, the legal position of Mr Esteban may find changed.

9) - The civil consequences 
Now, the blood flowed and the blood trail was erected in front line between legality and barbarism. The wake is a wake weapon. 
Mr. Prime Minister does not make a mistake.
 He orders "cut to pieces" the far-right groups. 
This is exactly the language when they tell historians relate that after the battle, one of the two camps let go and disbands.
 General of the other side asks his cavalry to hunt down fugitives and the "cut to pieces."
 So we would be in the presence of a war that has so far not speak its name.
 The death of Mr. Meric is the revelation of a covert battle in the city. 
 The warriors are among us.
 This war, after embodied in the crushed body of young Meric, will register on the tortured body of the young Esteban. 
The blood of Mr. Meric is the original blood, the miraculous spring, the fountain of youth, which continually come to drink the beneficiaries of this "divine surprise", or the "strange defeat". 
The cruel death of this young man for whom the wars of adults continued to be child's play creates a substitute for law.
It allows the bypass in it. 
 This legitimate death that really needs to be woven and the legality of which destroys the principles thereof.
Hope that reason prevails, that the judges did not leave tell, Mr. Meric rest in peace. 
Marc Salomone