lundi, avril 08, 2013

Sarkozy, crime and justice, theses Sarkozy

Sarkozy, crime and justice, theses Sarkozy
d.50 @ gmx.fr
The reference text is the French text


Paris, Monday, April 8, 2013



Mr. prosecutor



Copy to:- President of the Republic- Madam Attorney



Subject: criminals and the public authority


Mr. prosecutor
Title 1: The thesis of Mr. SarkozyOn 25 March 2013, Mr Sarkozy published on his Facebook page a statement of principle that contains theories about its relationship to justice.
These formulas are universal. They are independent of the case for which they were produced.
For theses Mr. Sarkozy disqualify all those who claim to be a reference to their inertia and their participation in Omerta.
1) - The text on Facebook"When I face the ordeal of a formal unfair and unfounded review, I want to thank from my heart all those who wanted to show me their trust. To all those who I supported as well as those who fought me, I want to state that at no time in my public life, I have not betrayed my duties.I will devote all my energy to demonstrate my integrity and honesty. The truth will prevail. I have no doubt.Needless to say, I claim no special treatment except that of every citizen to have the right to a fair and impartial justice.This is because I have confidence in the judicial institution that I will use the remedies which are open to all citizens. NS "
2) - The "treason""I want to say that at no time in my public life, I have not betrayed my duties. "
Subject Mrs. William, the Chained Duck, Canal +, the Nouvel Observateur, which I use as reference, have told the truth, do not be deceived, have checked their sources, the facts contradict this formula.
Mr. Sarkozy has "betrayed his duties" by:1 to 1 rapeMost likely a-gangb-rape, pimping, pandering hotel, embezzlement, tax evasion of taxes,2 - Rape of a memberRape of a representative of the Legislature by the Head of State, ie the Executive.Rape of the separation of powersRape of the Constitution3 - Criminal Changing how governmentCreating a parallel mafia law in public administrative law.Droit de seigneur on administrative administered.
It is therefore clear that Sarkozy can not account by itself criminal facts reported by the press concerning the functioning of institutions. It was then the justice to ask questions and get answers.
3) - The Truth"I will devote all my energy to demonstrate my integrity and honesty. The truth will prevail. I have no doubt. "Mr Sarkozy is facing himself publicly to the question of "betrayal of his office." He believes he has not failed. The facts indicate otherwise. It is justice to resolve the dispute between the truth and himself.
 
Mr Sarkozy says he will devote all his energy to establish his integrity and HONESTY. Mr. prosecutor may therefore open the debate with a knowledgeable and available partner.
4) - ImmunityFor two formulas shows that Mr. Sarkozy to himself renounced the slave fable full immunity of the Head of State in office.
A-"I have not betrayed my duties."The idea of ​​betraying his duties indicates that Mr. Sarkozy does not believe in the ideology of immunity. It can "betray" and therefore out of the legal framework that organizes its "charge" and immunity.
Ordinary B-Treatment"It goes without saying that I claim no special treatment except that of every citizen to have the right to a fair and impartial justice. "Mr. Sarkozy abandons there any reference to a special treatment related to immunity. It recognizes that issues of personal crime must be judged like everyone else.
5) - The Omerta and the lawBy claiming to be judged like everyone else, Sarkozy invalidate the clever technique by which network managers have reported the facts, including Mrs. William.Facts are reported while preventing it would be indecent to see something other than worldliness. From that moment, all the executives who try to bring the case to trial would be immediately isolated, ostracized, neutralized by their peers.Therefore, only a junior employee, without public or institutional ambition, can wear this crazy project to point out to Mr. prosecutor that rape was committed, which, and it must be judged.According to the criteria used by Mr. Sarkozy, a rape committed by himself must be considered by the court as it does for everyone.
6) - Right"It's because I have confidence in the judicial institution that I will use the remedies which are open to every citizen"A rights-pathways are open to all citizens.Mr. B-Sarkzoy accept questions from the bench. They are self-evident.This concludes the considerations on inequality between citizens of the Judge Salas researcher.
Title 2: Justice
7) - The silence of Mr. SarkozyIt is conceivable that Mr. Sarkozy is aware of my approach, Paris is small. This Facebook page is so for both the case where he is indicted and one in which I stand.
By the assertion that he never "betrayed his duties," Mr Sarkozy proclaims that in the case raised by Mrs. William has no awareness of having committed an offense, or to a woman, or to "bear", ie the state, the Republic.
Mr. Sarkozy did not even bother to answer or the revelations of Mrs. William, or the request for an inquiry by Mr. Salomone following the publicity of these facts.
 
He received assurances from the media that they will not seek to obtain a judicial inquiry.
He knows I judge researcher Salas has published an article in the Paris to declare that Mr. Salomone is a social rank too less for judges accept his request for a person to presidential rank.
Having been President of the Republic, he knows that Mr. Salomone is considered by the judges as an inferior social status to any legal action concerning State officials. Whatever the crimes committed by them against him.
8) - The ideology of the importanceThe denial comes first certainty that the prosecutor will never agree to comply with the request of an unimportant man who is a very important person. The tramp and VIP.
It is no coincidence that, in the case where Mr. Sarkozy is Indicted, the department or the prosecutor have missed the information that the prosecution would require the dismissal of Mr. Sarkozy. While the information was partially denied. It was recalled that the report of the prosecutor of the Republic would be given in 4 months.


Nobody is fooled. For the French officers, they should say publicly that the charge of an important character is not obvious. They had to create evidence that the importing Aside review the long arm of relations in the judiciary, over in the process.
The distinction between what is "important" or "not important" is a obscessionnelle ideology at all stages of state government.
When you are poor, weak, vulnerable, the first qualification of your business what you hear, you have to admit, is that "your case is not important." "It's not important." "You think this is important, but it is not important." Police, judges, lawyers, all working first in the qualification of the importance and unimportance.
Coluche summarized the non-importance of a word: "Move along, there's nothing to see."
Rejecting the judicial requests from people "unimportant" is used to diqualifier their next steps; to filing a court application to avenge the rejection of the previous one. This allows revenge supposed to torture the avenger to heal and protect potential victims. Ride rides, contempt has no limit.
9) - Another practice of lawIn the case before us, Sarkozy is under the Head of State. The alleged rape of a woman held for:-Assign a women a place, which was their place,b-Assign administered to a place which was their place before the Revolution and under the Occupation,c-Assign network administrative staff to face up to citizens, give them a policy. This place was theirs under the old regime, the Occupation in the colonies against the natives.
By opening a preliminary investigation, the prosecutor of the Republic:a-shake impunity for senior executives of the state.b-disqualify impunity for civilian executives, private, acting also by evidence of a tutelary power.c-Would open the way for discussion of administrative policies that reduce administrative reports to administration to manipulation of objects.



Accompanying civil Omerta by a judicial absence, Mr. prosecutor leaves the way open for another practice of law. Cohen Tanugi in a book "The right without a state", has this practice as the future of law. It is defined by the spontaneous lower the unchallenged domination of the strongest acceptance.
This is the subsitution of the evaluation of the strength of the rule of law.
This substitution is at work in this case:1 - This is what the honorable member is agreeing to subordinate to Mr. Sarkozy, to follow him, to kneel to suck, swallow, go room.2 - This is what ordinary citizens are silent.3 - This is what Mrs. William by the terms of the highest standard by which to judge the weak.It has as well as:a-The member must accept.b-By cons, Mrs. William distributes pairs of slaps. For it is in the strong camp, but always with the right to rape.4 - The press informs taking good qualifications that might seem to bring the two protagonists, weak and strong, to equality before the law.
10) - Codes of administrative proceduresMr. prosecutor may think it right to parallel legal right has always existed. It is now called the right of "blunder".
Yes, but when these practices become those gutters administrative officer of the State, its leader, they become a new Code of Administrative Procedure and compete with the official codes, legal.
There is no reason for the second Administrative Procedure Code does not increase to a third religious for example, then another, mafia, another, racketeering, etc..
For example:1 - Mr. Cahuzac uses the Administrative Procedure Code allows tax evasion. This code has been declared prohibited. But it is not taken for granted. By itself the government has accepted the existence of the parallel code. It took a news and late legal action.
2 - The officers of the tray Marseille have set up a code allowing racketeering and involvement in illicit trade.
a-The policeman who objected was dismissed for dishonorable reasons. The Code has been declared non-existent.Therefore it has not been said and could not continue to operate.b-The following year, at the request of dealers, their code has been declared prohibited.c-The prohibition of parallel code Bac, at the request of a dealer, it's been associated with some recognition of the parallel Administrative Code of dealers?
3 - Mr. Sarkozy staged a Procedure Code which allows rape. The fact is declared non-existent. The use of this code which is not prohibited.
Subsidiary question:-How long has the other codes they may be declared banned?b-How long will the official Administrative Code, it will have a monopoly of legality?c-How long, multiple parallel administrative codes will be presented, it will be illegal?Everyone expects the judicial response.
11) - Crime framesTo investigate managers still must admit the possibility of their crime.This is precisely what does not want to hear talk French executives. Crime are the popular classes. Honesty, it is the ruling classes.
So instead of addressing criminality as they present themselves, the French managers play continuously hysterical comedy.a-On the one hand, specialists constantly sniffing the stools of the working classes to interpret the events of their dangers involved.b-On the other hand, the executive networks spread across about apocalyptic each time a frame is made by hand in the cookie jar.c-rétalité is neither better nor worse. It is another.
There is nothing extravagant that Mr Sarkozy and Mr Cahuzac, for example, are called criminals. Crime is a qualification of human practices which are found everywhere obviously.
What may be surprising is the removal of the judiciary on the study of these facts. Judges are the only ones who can give the French legal benchmarks.



8) - ConclusionThere is no need to be in the "important" secrets to understand that Mr. Sarkozy is protected title of Honorary President and possible future candidate for the same position.
I have demonstrated that this case concerns the functioning of institutions and the constitution.
This would be a significant blow to legal aid in the establishment of the right of women to interview a President on his relations with women, their place in society, their rights.
In any case, women probably take confidence in the judiciary.
Possibly, if it interests the judges, it would be an important step towards consideration by a Judiciary Powers of the Republic.
However, it comes a question. The answer to this question can confirm or invalidate our approach: the rape of a female MP is it important?
Please accept, Mr. prosecutor, insurance of my distinguished consideration,

Marc Salomone

Aucun commentaire: