Sarkozy, rape, judicial protection, political silence

Translation google translation. The reference text is the French text.Paris, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012


 Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam AttorneyYour Ref. 12/00 282 (quoted in all correspondence)N. No. : -1 - Wednesday, July 4, 2012. Article Chained Duck.2 - Thursday, July 19, 2012, article in the Nouvel Observateur.3 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor.4 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.5 - Friday, July 27, 2012, Addendum.6 - Friday, July 27. Letter to the President of the Republic7 - Monday, November 12, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor8 - Monday, November 12, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic


Mr. Prosecutor,Part 1: DetailsWith all respect due to you, the facts that are presented to you following the book Mrs. William and media activity that followed, dealing with rape of a Member by the Head of the State at the Elysee Palace, in a public ceremony.This raises two questions is essential:


1 - Can we leave:a-A man forcing a woman to suck his dick, arguing that "it is not much," and only for "not leave it like that! ".b-blackmail and procuring part of the legality of public administration?c-The executive humiliate and subjugate the Legislature?d-condemn a man in distress for his pentalon paste on that of a woman in a public place, at the fly closed, and buttock, covered, and ensure that other men the right to impose targeted to a woman, the sight of a pentalon and underpants down, their genitals, sexual penetration to be satisfied, humiliate and lower the parliament?2 - The frames were all concerned, and especially all, answer these questions by silence, ie by the cowardice and complicity.What will you do?Part 2: current legalNews related to the current judicial policy for Mr. Sarkozy, brings elements to clarify and strengthen the application for preliminary information given by Mrs. William acts of Mr. Sarkozy.1 - Immunity2 - The identities of rape.3 - A guilty silence1) - ImmunityThe case of alleged rape that I have submitted to your attention does not depend on the question of presidential immunity or the Apreciation of it since there comparing the two Powers constitutionels.However, this case is constantly given immunity as an insurmountable obstacle to the simple public review of the actions of Mr. Sarkozy during the exercise of the function of Head of State.On this issue, lawyers are qualified to provide guidance in the exercise of their functions.1 - The judge Gentil2 - The Advocate General of the Court of Cassation3 - The lawyer Anticor
1 - summons the judge GentilThursday 22 November 2012, Mr Sarkozy is heard by the Judge, Mr. Gentil.A-It is asked in particular about:a-Sarkozy has you he received money from Mrs. Bettencourt for his 2007 presidential campaign?b-Sarkozy is he involved in the judicial inquiry, under the Head of State during his meetings with Mr. Courroye, and through them?The interrogation lasted 12 hours. A little long for a debate purely formal.Mr Sarkozy is now assisted Witness.Definition: Person questioned in a criminal investigation, but that it is not directly accused the commission of an offense. It can be indicted if the magistrates feel they have gathered against him of "serious and corroborating evidence" that he has committed an offense.What concerns us here is that Mr. Gentile was officially interested in the activities of Mr. Sarkozy when he is Head of State, and as such.a-All its possible interventions in the folder Betencourt place in this respect.b-Mr Courroye saw at the Elysee PalaceNobody found fault with this concern. Or magistrates of Bordeaux, neither the Department nor Mr. Sarkozy, nor his lawyer.B-relational evidenceFor the purposes of his defense, in the office of judge Gentil, Sarkozy has shown that in practice the government, the "separation of powers" is an illusion.- "I can tell you that neither Philip nor Courroye myself have acted to delay, modify or complicate the Bettencourt affair,,, I want to prove that your designation is intervenru to Intitiative Philippe Courroye on the instruction of the Attorney General of Versailles. And who would have thought that the PG of Versailles would have this instruction if the custody Seceux was not right? And who can imagine that the Minister of Justice gives its approval if the President does not agree?;;, This is proof that I do not interfere ... ".The Chained Duck, the mercrdit November 28, 2012, P. 8Mr Sarkozy intervenes at this time as all defendants who can not provide proof or certainty that the judge is wrong. It organizes a supposed paradox cancel by his pseudo blindingly obvious all statements of the judge.Proof that I did not upset the appointment of a judge since his appointment was made under my control. This proves nothing but returns to the judge to prove that the defendant objected to an appointment he held himself.This paradox vehicle a second operation. Mr. Sarkozy authorities place between him and the judge. The Attorney General and the Minister. This is no longer the defendant is questioned by the judge, but the superiors of it. Bullying is obvious.It makes a third operation. To impose the paradox, the accused is removed himself from the position he cites as one which ensures the neutrality of the operation.It is no longer so and so "president." This is "The President .. "" The left, "" The Keeper. " The judge is thus reflected the operation of a statutory obligation. He is free to go after the "President .. "," PG .. , "" Keeper of the Seals. " A simple matter to check timetable the judge is put in the position to ask the presidential institution and not one of its licensees.The defendant does not answer the question. It creates an official world and officials between him and the judge.The police are familiar with this technique is to show them a map tricolor as a paper indentity pretending naively error document or otherwise the reliability of the presented piece.Apparently, Mr. Gentile has come to the same conclusion as the police just stop a motorist who has just passed the queue when riding on the sidewalk. To order: Please Submit your paper! The driver pulls out a card bouble shutters, under the National Assembly. He adds: That's what you want to see? The policeman replied: Well, it is, move along. And it opens the way to the offender.It's beautiful relationship.C-The acquiredMr. Sarkozy has not been indicted. It was placed under the status indicator attended intermediate status between lamp and indicted. There is no room for complacency. This does not change the fact that during 12H responded to questions on facts that occurred during his presidency. He was careful not to challenge before the hearing by counsel, during, before the judge, or after, by his counsel, the right of the magistrate to ask him questions about his relationship with Mr. Courroye in their interviews at the Elysee best place for the exercise of Presidential power.Take into action.
Mr Sarkozy provqué a statement lashing the Prosecutor General and the judge overturning information clamées by his lawyer at the output. Be treated publicly lying by judges is not the best honest.2 - The preliminary investigation surveys the ElyséeIn the case of surveys of the Elysee, the First Advocate General Boccon-Gibod the Supreme Court questioned the absolute presidential immunity invoked by the prosecutor of Paris then M.Marin.The case shall be tried by the Court of Cassation. December 19, 2012. Nevertheless, the question of immunity is called into question by a second judge, in the exercise of its functions.In addition, the prosecutor became Attorney General of the Court of Cassation, M. Marin, without judging, refused to object to the consideration of the question.3 - The lawyer AnticorThe lawyer Anticor, the association lodged a complaint about the polls, says Nicolas Sarkozy could be caught up in this case. If the court established that "responding to a survey ordered partisan initiative or personal [...] these acts [would] be detachable from the presidential office," and would no longer be covered by immunity.It has become a fact that for lawyers, judges and lawyers, the legend of the magic armor of the Head of State has disappeared. The fact remains that the substrate policy, fairy tale which degrades our country at the forefront of Sudan.4 - acquiredThis nonsense full immunity, including any crime, is no longer used by the person himself. This is the lesson of Bordeaux.It is also no longer followed by judges, magistrate and the first General Counsel of the Supreme Court, no less.It is no longer retained in the arguments of counsel as an association Anticor which contains a multitude of judges, lawyers, statesmen in it.A hand to silence the people, it serves to who and what?What judge would dare to defend in a public forum of European lawyers? And after presenting his candidacy for the European Court of Justice!
2) - the identities of rapeSee attached interview Contenseau psychiatrist,1 - The identity of the rapistsMr. Camaret is considered to be sexually enjoyed its ascendancy, and strength, of minors under his authority.Mr Sarkozy had abused a woman, major, circumstantially placed under his authority. I request consideration of a possible preparation and complicity implies.There is no difference between Mr. Camaret of scam and Sarkozy. Subject to the action of Mr. Sarkozy is verified and proven.Both practice rape domination and social morality. They enjoy both the social and moral weakness of their prey.Prey do not complain for the same reasons set social and moral wrong.2 - The remarkable identities of rapeThe current publication of a manifesto against rape codifies this identification. In fact, it shows that both attackers and the civil state, meet the same logical schema.From the interview with the psychiatrist Assize Courts, Mr. Conteenseau, without being exhaustive, the following points are identical to all forms of rape.A speech-IdentityAnswering the question: What are the procedures of rapists? Mr. Contenseau said:- "The rapist may submit a victim of violence, verbal threats, harassment as repetitive pressure (" Come on, let yourself go ")"Sarkozy said that at the meeting the alleged rape:- "Be nice ... you can see that I need to relax. Come on, it's not much! You can not leave me like this. ".B-Identity of social supporta-M.Camaret will benefit from the support of the social evidence.As a witness, one of the fathers of a child victim:- "His father, a childhood friend of the coach, also called to testify Tuesday, said he as soon recovered his daughter. Without further discussion with the coach. "It would have been useless."If he had filed a complaint at this time, "it" would just "served" to stop the crime.C-Sarkozy is defended by those who refer the matter- Le Nouvel Observateur: Formulas rapist, the journalist said:- "Again, nothing to offend"- Mrs. William says: (Nouvel Observateur)"" I wanted to talk about the relationship between a man of power and sex. The scene exists, but it is universal. This is perhaps the only scene from the book that is not violent. It is trivial. This elected cares, she has seen others. Ouand you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. 'Celia Marie-Guillaume said she, "get away with such cases by distributing a pair of slaps," but does bring "no moral judgment" on those who give. '-The Chained Duck says "treat", "scene worship." journalist warns"Cooking policy loses its charm when it is bitten way too realistic. ".It should be remembered that the journalist JF Kahn has had to apologize for having spoken of "trussing servant" about the D. Straus-Kahn. But in this case, it contradicted the U.S. government. And there, the French executives do laugh more.D-identity denialMr. Camaret is in complete denial. No real apology to victims. Just enough cunning to Assisi.Mr. Sarkozy sees in this a conspiracy information and indecency, his friends organize jamming tracks on television sets.Nothing on the object information. Not a word of acknowledgment of the facts.For an apology to the woman, the member, the Constitution, the Nation.E-Identity of social inferiority victimsIf the victims are reluctant to complain, it is primarily due to the respectability of the rapist. Torture is waiting for them to withdraw their complaint. Judges bury all complaints by silence.F-Identity proximity of predators and prey.Mr. Camaret violates adolescent under his authority.Mr. Sarkozy reportedly raped a Member under its power.G-Identity passive complicity of government.Having been raped twice, in the province by owners shopping in Paris by the police, I know something.No complaint can not succeed. I was abducted, kidnapped, tortured twice. With the complicity of the maritime prefect of the Alps, on the pretext of my hunger strike. In conspiracy between the public prosecutor of Paris and the police on the pretext of me on my audition complaints.In each case, to silence me. Each person lives raped her ordeal Official.I proposed a method of compensation costs nothing to the state and earns money. Nothing was done.For cons, I saw the prosecutor, counsel for the victim (sic), the police, the judicial aid office, a bailiff, mobilize several months to protect a thug and prevent mentally disabled touch the damages that the 14th President of the Criminal Chamber has recognized.Identity-H proximityThe rule is that the greater part of the prey know their predators.This is true for Mr. Camaret. This is true for Mr. Sarkozy.I-Indices and consistentThat Mr. Sarkozy has practiced in the light of the story of Mrs. William picked up by the media, is the formalism of rape.In any case, we now know that the charges against Mr Sarkozy, they need to be verified and established, and it is the only object of our action, are acts of rape. They meet all the criteria of fact and expertise of rape.J-sideration of the person rapedIn both cases, but in thousands of cases, they obey mechanically. I can testify: Two years of total loss of memory.k-Disqualification complainantsSome wonder whether the prey complaint. I refer to statements jouralistes and Mrs. William senior.Some say a-trivial case, the classic reports of rape,b-The other, the instard apparently all women executives, said that women who notice publicly raped rape must leave the profession by disability.c-This is exactly what rapists say cities: bitches need only suffer, be silent, to break.In the case of Mr. Camaret, initiated the trial stops responding at trial that it is acting out of jealousy. At other times, she would have responded to court for false accusation or psychiatrists under a delusion affabulatoire. If only for the fact to blame beyond the date of expiry.In the case of Mr. Sarkozy, the only question posed by French managers is how a nobody can dare afford to hold accountable a man so large and hinder a career supported by all Senior judges.It is by accusing him of wanting to annoy an important man not much parcequ'elles are nothing but prey leave these criminals thrive.We see that the rejection of my application to open a preliminary investigation is included in the logic of rape.The Inequality-law realRapists are protected by the social evidence of rape. The rapist can not be rapist, it is much more important than the criminal action.Mr. Camaret could not be charged because it involved a "big name" of the sport, a coach of Heads of State. The scandal should be avoided at all costs.Mr Sarkozy can not be heard for rape. Immunity is not for nothing. Prejudice to alot.What are prey to the predator?M-Complicity socialIt is noted the deafening silence of feminist associations, political parties, elected. This is still an MP who has been raped. Not a word.

Part 3: A guilty silence,1 - The specificity of the action of Mr. SarkozyMr Sarkozy has engaged a provocation to the institutions of the Republic. He has challenged to publicly name his action.He did not need to rape the woman. For getting sucked, he had to place his wife and a friend forever.By cons, if was looking for a confrontation with the Legislature, the Judiciary, feminists, there was no better opportunity, surfers would say the best spot to put them up against the wall of the to face.We are in December 2008, Mr. Sarkozy is at the top of his aura. He feels there to do battle with the institutions and intermediary bodies. Called at the time, reform.Tell a member of Parliament, in public, in front of foreign statesmen: A knees and suck my cock! It is a challenge to all those who seek to limit its power.Nobody said anything, and nobody says anything.It is cowardly and irresponsible.
 2 - SluggishAll participants are senior executives of the state. Not interfere or protest.Television reports on the work of the judiciary shows the closed sessions in which students are led to condemn really real prison sentences of simple fellows for not helping a person in danger, just because they panicked before a accident.A member is violated. No Group President, any member, any member not get worried.Senators, Senators, have no concern for the assault made to the legislature.Journalists organize their information so that it becomes obvious that no claim no legal action. This is a joke.Feminists MEET subscribers absent. With so much cowardice and dishonesty than other executive networks concerned.Lawyers are absent.Should expand the list of all specialists dysfunction refuge in silence?3 - condéOmerta enjoyed Mr. Sarkozy is opposed not only to judicial intense chatter against the weak and the mentally ill.Policy frameworks ranking government does not have too.At the same time they participate in silence on the information produced by Mrs. William rape and repeated by the media, judges come to open an investigation, preliminary or not, Mr. Cope, its relations with public-private M . Takieddine wheeler at odds with the law.M.Copé denies any involvement in any crime whatsoever. This does not différenment Mr. Sarkozy. But Mr. Cope, it is not enough to stop the action of the magistrates.M.Copé is MP, former Minister President of the main opposition party in France .. It can be called to stand for presidential elections and be elected.If it is, as claimed by the Judge Salas researcher, not to jeopardize careers by accusations risky, what twists M.Copé made by this legal initiative is it less important for political capacities it than would be the opening of a preliminary investigation into the rape of information concerning Mr Sarkozy?4 - Mrs. WilliamMrs. William gives us a reason for the silence, moral and judicial frameworks French.For executives, rape is a ritual, an integration test, a testThat member was raped as well as cadets, the élèvres graduate are bizutés, sometimes with loss of life. It must accept the rape for fear of being rejected by the group to which it claims to integrate. It is significant that it is ordered to accept the other women too.Of course, Mrs. William says she is doing by distributing large eyes and slaps. How can it affimer that rape is a legitimate rule, indisputable, the work of political life, and at the same time tell us that women escape when she want?Women are suddenly reduced to the status of Minor Napoleonic to the situation of eternal beginners.
Feminists who petitioned against rape now support this view by Omerta flawless. Septre the power that women executives are firmly in hand like a screw subreptissement man erect.5 - JudgesPerson in this case can not argue the risk of an unreliable source. Mrs. William was denied by anyone.A-A report particular facts delinquentsAbout possible litigation Fillon in the case of domestic electoral political party that opposes Mr. Cope, the press tells us that a senior judge stated that "the criminal would be deadly."Thus, a senior judge courageously anonymous advises publicly called out by Mr Sarkozy as "crap" by Mr. Fillon "mafia."By cons, when a citizen asks publicly on his behalf, to justice, to examine the public statements of rape, never denied by the parties, the same "Senior judges" remain silent.B-A lack of loyaltyThe Silence of the magistrates in this case is a violation of constitutional loyalty they owe to the rule of law.CONCLUSION1 - On the mafia murders in Corsica, the Minister of the Interior Valls: "The fight will not be effective if all the legal mechanisms for the rule of law work."Question: Who will you-we believe that all network managers have not noticed that rape is legal for some and illegal for others. The only policy networks French managers is to find the good in people.2 - I am perfectly in my place by exposing official crime I denounce.I know what I'm talking about and I experience the legal battle that allows me to name the crime and call the authorities.3 - Mr Sarkozy there a future public? It is to him and the French people alone to decide.For some this means that it must avoid "problem" of justice.For others, it means it must be able to respond to judicial matters he voluntarily provoked.Remember that in this case, it is Mr. Sarkozy, knowingly, deliberately chose to violate a woman, a member of Parliament, the Legislature, the Constitution.The press tells us about anger, it seems Homeric Mr Sarkozy on what happens to the UMP. I allow you to share the voiceless wrath of an ordinary citizen facing the omerta.I still sign in and request the opening of a preliminary investigation.I urge you to approve, Mr. Prosecutor, the assurance of my highest consideration,Marc Salomone

PS: The expert testimony:Psychiatrist and criminologist, Roland Coutanceau is the author of "Wounds of intimacy" (Odile Jacob). Interview.Can we develop a typical profile of the rapist?- Three major families of rape can be distinguished: incest, pedophilia and extra-familial rape on adults. It is a crime nearby. Most of the time, the victim knows her attacker. The logic of influence is very present. The rapist may be the leader of a group of friends for example. In cases of pedophilia, it often exercises a profession related to childhood teacher, priest, pediatrician ... The educational relationship turns into abuse. Only a minority of rapists are predators with a scheme, even if it is the image that most worries in the popular unconscious. They are also those most likely to reoffend.Rapists have in common?They suffer from a disease of the human relationship. There are a variety of rapists, but all share the same triptych. They are very selfish in the first place, facing the satisfaction of their desires. Then, they are unable to understand what happens in the head of the victim, it does not interest them, while their eyes strike the suffering of the other cries, says he does not agree . Finally, they allow the abuse, a grip on the other.What are the procedures?- The rapist may submit a victim of violence, verbal threats, harassment as repetitive pressure ("Come on, let yourself go") or by manipulation: for example, a teenager is filming her naked with her girlfriend portable and threaten to spread the video if it does not let touch with his friends. Often, the rapist elect a mode of action, it is rare that all uses.What triggers the passage to the act?As we say colloquially, "is the opportunity makes the thief." Although more men than you think can slip into situations "at risk" alone with a woman, drunk, late night ... Many rapists do not in fact the ability to repeat their act in other circumstances. Sexual assault is a potential of more than human, a diabolical temptation. Sexual frustration is, of course, one of the ingredients of the explosive cocktail, but it is not the most important. It takes a certain personality, weak to begin with. As for the drive, this is a simplistic explanation. Rapists have neither the courage nor the maturity to recognize that they have abused someone, then they hide behind this argument, for convenience. In therapy, it leads them to assume their actions. It is even at the heart of care.