region, subornation of perjury, an offense

Paris, Monday, November 12, 2012


Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney
Your Ref. 12/00 282 (quoted in all correspondence)N. No. : On the Regional Council of Ile de France1 - Wednesday, August 14, 2012. Article Chained Duck.2 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor3 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012. Article Chained Duck.4 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor5 - Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Article Chained Duck.6 - Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor7 - Wednesday, 5 September 2012 Article of the Chained Duck8 - Friday, 7 September 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor


The Prosecutor of the Republic
Subject: Request to open a preliminary investigation for Bribery of a witness, obstructing justice.

Memory

1) - PreambleIt is impossible to prevent offenders to be aware that they have committed criminal offense, to worry about those they have committed, the risks involved because of denunciations which they are subject.The article in the August 28 and August 29, the text inform Mr. Prosecutor that the Department of Regional Council of Ile de France comes to Bribing a witness, she used force to hinder the course of legal action.In this regard, I request the opening of a preliminary investigation.I take Huchon as the representative of the Council responsible for two reasons:He has been involved directly in denunciation likely executives honest and consecutively to the crackdown against Mr. CRT Managing Director, Mr. Blat.b-In the last instance it is Huchon that supports all public responsibilities in this case.


Part 1: Witness Tampering2) - Witness TamperingIn the article of August 22, Mr. Director General of the Regional Tourism Committee (CRT, the organization that funds the escapades of politicians and corrupt officials), Mr. Blat appears under his name, endorsing the article the Agapes London, August 14 article. Hence, it shows that this article is a flare sent by honest hierarchy of the Regional Council.Mr. Blat tells us that the CRT is corrupted into its composition. It confirms that the action of the TRC "Agapes London." Nepotism, personal enrichment, violation of all administrative rules for hiring. All this has been extensively discussed in the text of the August 17, then in the call of October 12.Article August 29 tells us that Mr. Blat was convened. By whom? The investigation alone will tell. He was ordered to return to his remarks. The press tells us: "Since Blat was asked to retract his confession."I do not know why the press uses the term "confession". This is a possible slip.However, the term goes back to the same logic as the writings of Mrs. William. It uses a novel logical to give us a true crime that she also wants to conceal the scope of justice.Nobody reverses the facts.At this stage, this series of articles on a weekly support tells us that there is a link between all these items. This link is the fierce battle that engages Regional Council between executives and corrupt politicians and executives and elected officials honest.3) - The reading of Article 5 SeptemberThis highlights a new light article of September 5.It is rational to think that the fact that the revelation of a crime of the President in person just Huchon Directors General themselves. It is a reprisal that followed the ratonade suffered by their alter ego CRT.These people are certainly not Mr. Blat, but they are probably Heads of services. Otherwise the newspaper probably not cite the writings of Chief services in this episode. Public information on the car is a warning to those who would like to organize other notices.4) - The problem of M HuchonHuchon not do to journalists, competitors, adventurers, etc.. It is intended for employees of his administration, which is more of Heads of the administration.This is not an inquiry but a single institutional confrontation.If Huchon leaves to the arrest of justice through news reports, institutional mechanisms can be put in motion. Either labor or opposition (Ms. Pécresse, former minister, candidate for M.Huchon, ask questions, even if isolated from its own), or other institutions (taxes can sometimes cause trouble mechanically ). Justice could end up in care.Huchon must show that he is a captain in the boat. The information is good, solidarity colleagues face the vast world full of danger, is better.Huchon not deny the facts. It simply requires that they be concealed. He did not ask Mr. Blat to recognize that he lied. He just wants to accept denial.However, these facts are judicial.5) - The judicial character of the factsCertainly, there is no complaint from Mr. Blat.But a part of criminal misconduct are publicly exposed. Type in the box to increase his personal lifestyle is criminal.On the other hand, there are already two requests for opening of criminal investigations.Here is the table:1 - Wednesday, August 14, 2012. Article Chained Duck.
 Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor
 Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic2 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012. Article Chained Duck.
 Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor3 - Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Article Chained Duck. (Announcement of the withdrawal of admissions of Mr. Blat)
 Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor4 - Wednesday, 5 September 2012 Article of the Chained Duck
 Friday, September 7, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorWe see that the convening of Mr. Blat is after the receipt of the request by Mr. Prosecutor. August 17. She is also back to mail received by the President of the Republic. These requests were also sent to various organizations. Some have advised that law.It is not absurd to think that the direction of the Regional Council is aware that legal action is underway from August 17, due to the issue dated 14 August Chained Duck.She was able to call Mr. Blat soon as his name appears in the next issue of the journal, August 22.It is urgent to prohibit senior Council to testify.This highlights the willingness of employees to express their oppostion honest practices in force.As soon as Mr. Blat is called the Chained Duck after the case is informed of this meeting and its grounds, Article fate next week, August 29.Then, in retaliation and warning indicated in Chained Duck Mr Huchon engages in practices prohibited by the law. The article appears in the following week, on September 5.It is characteristic that these items follow from week to week. It's a real tussle within the Regional Council.This session is not forced withdrawal of the statement by the management of an invalidation of the facts mentioned by Mr. Blat on the grounds that they would be false in any manner whatsoever.This question the veracity of the facts is not mentioned by the Directorate or by Mr. Prosecutor. We do not want to discuss it, that's all.This changes the status of the discussion.6) - The status of the discussionManagement does not argue his point of view. She just wants to compel Mr. Blat to deny its own, because it's not consistent with the management.However, the point of view of Mr. Blat is not a civil point of view. It is a judicial point of view. He denounced publicly delinquent activities. Therefore, during the meeting Mr. Blat, these facts fall asleep and already legal action. By the press, by Mr. Salomone.Asking Mr. Blat lying to oneself, to shut up when he showed the mean free will publicly mistakes he observes, the Department of Regional Council asks M.Blat to mislead made to justice, lying to him. It prevents, by coercion, M. Blat bring his remarks to justice in any way whatsoever.Executive Council knows that a request for a preliminary inquiry is submitted. The investigation will prove it.This is therefore constitutive of an offense of Bribery of witness.


7) - SeniorThis is not Mr. Salomone, or the press, outside the facts that judges cite comparaîtres with established jurisprudence. cf. art. September 5. These are senior employees honest or resistant.On the one hand, the press would not have known without them.On the other hand, it is clear that information on the car Huchon is a reprisal payroll to employee ratonade frame that is displayed with the press in the termination of CRT, the second text (28.08) hidden and therefore confirmation of Crime trip to London, the first text (17.08), classified.Bribery of concealing the witness is deliberately ignoring the calls of employees and the Regional Council opts for abuses leaders.This coup is not taking sides in a conflict that opposed Mr. Salomone Mr Huchon.The conflict between the executive employees honest, we do not know the name of Mr. Blat, Mr Huchon and others whose political group leaders and executives who are their allies in these cases.
These errors are not highlighted by individuals. Mr. Salomone mail is the transmission of information supplied by third parties to press for political and judicial.Who are they?They are not victims. They are in no way personally affected directly by the mistakes made by the leaders fault.They are not in the case of the member allegedly raped by Mr. Sarkozy.These are the executives, Directors General, the General Council of Ile de France.These people are the representatives of the law to the Regional Council.The only employee who is involved publicly because he is an executive, Mr. Blat is: Managing Director of Regional Tourism Committee (CRT) in the Ile-de-France, a public body.It is not a victim. This is a senior officer of the State. He is accountable for the practice of law in the administration he leads.8) - The disqualification of seniorJustify Bribery of a witness is not to remove Mr. Blat his personal misery, but to disqualify professionally.The legalization of nepotism is a procedure done in the composition of legal authorities in their political organization. It is difficult to tell to cover it by concern for the strict observance of the separation of powers.M, Blat is not alone in being disqualified. The Director General of Services, who made the bans use of cars of the Board, is also. And the networks they embody. All those who are responsible for implementing works democratic and administrative arrangements do not support the criminal misuse of legal forms.Let us not say we do not know the concerns of executives. Mr. Blat takes care to tell the press:- "Do not search, I did the math"Calculations, these ladies and gentlemen have done much more. It would suffice to ask them.This disqualification extends to all other sequences of their responsibilities.Thus, Mr. Director General of CRT was beaten for telling the press that:- "In 47% of cases, the presence of employees (tourism committee) is in connection with regional politicians or their political past."It would therefore declare that senior leaders of the Regional Council employees are incompetent to judge the proper use of the right to Regional Council on:- Cars,- Public funds,- From the rules of employment.9) - Changing perspectives judicialThe question of jurisdiction is crucial. Everyone will think that a chap has no competence to judge or prejudge the guilt of persons so great.

By cons, if the prosecutor retains the opinion of Mr. Chief services or Mr. Director General of Regional Tourism Committee, the famous CRT, it is quite otherwise.Justice can even remove a formula from a Director if it is a quote from a journalist. It could be said cavity truncated, distorted, taken out of context. For example, the text of 28 August, following the August 22 article.
 By cons, if the prosecutor retains the text of the August 30 consecutive Article August 29, it must examine the qualification of Bribery of witness.In this case, it must give the floor to the Director-General himself. From there, it will give a voice to all senior conceernés. The debate changed dimension. It is no longer possible to use delaying tactics and socially abject moral contortions to disqualify the word citizen Mr. Salomone.PART 2: A real legal dispute10) - Purpose of the study: Huchon et alThis is a group of four texts specifically related to newspaper articles.a-The first is from August 17 to August 14 article.b-The second is from August 28 to August 22 article.c-The third and August 30 to August 29 article.d-The fourth is September 7th article of September 5.These four characteristics texts.1 - They are linked.2 - They lead us to see a challenge from offenders Republic3 - They reveal a test imposed on the Republic11) - Texts and linksReading the letters to Mr. Prosecutor, we find the following links between texts:1 - Our letter dated Tuesday, August 28:In Ref. : Our letter of 17 August 2012Introduction by:- "The newspaper" The Chained Duck ", Wednesday, 22 August 2012, provides a complement to the request for a judicial inquiry that I made to you on August 17 ... ";Chapter 1:"The distribution of positions is not necessarily criminal in itself. In fact, this is one of the functions of elected officials to recommend people.This action becomes criminal when it is manifest that accompanies grabbing public funds for specific purposes, they were collective, and a diversion of official objectives of the entity. 'In conclusion:"The involvement of CRT in the adventure of the delegation of the Olympics is not a coincidence. The CRT had a function can be honest initially became a means to include corruption in the ordinary operation of the Regional Council of Ile de France. '2 - Article of 29 August 2012:"The revelations of the" Duck "on the Regional Tourism Committee (CRT) in the Ile-de-France, became the piston machine politicians in the region, have earned a serous avoinée the Director General of the agency, Jean- Pierre Blat But this is not to be hired by the dozen children, spouses, relatives or friends of the heart of its elected leaders rallied her bracesHis mistake: he confessed to waterfowl that "in 47% of cases, the presence of employees (tourism committee) is in connection with regional politicians or their political past." Since Blat was asked to retract his confession,,, "3 - Our letter of 30 August 2012.It is consequential to the cited article of August 29.A-Introduction"Re: Request to open a preliminary investigation (cont'd: 3)N. No. :a-du17 letters and August 28, 2012b-The Chained Duck, Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. P.3."The squeaking of the piston engine." And Dominique Hervé Liffran Simonnot. "B-Text:- 1st and 2nd paragraph: Relates to the CRT and texts 1 and 2.- 3rd paragraph: Relates text on the alleged misconduct of Mr. Sarkozy.3 - Article 5 September"The other local elected who practiced this sport have also been persecuted by evil judges moons.But to discourage Huchon Saab to ride the beautiful roads of France ... "4 - Our letter of 7 SeptemberA-Introduction- "N. No. :a-du17 letters and August 28, 2012b-The Chained Duck, Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. P.3."The squeaking of the piston engine." And Dominique Hervé Liffran Simonnotc-Letter of August 30. 'B-textSecond paragraph:"If this newspaper insists and, by publishing an article every week on the institutionalization of corruption in the Regional Council of Ile de France is a number of frames of the Ile-de-France have enough to watch helplessly, even participate in this orgy of corruption to ensure the feudal ideology of elected officials. 'Third paragraph:"I request the opening of a preliminary investigation into the issues raised in the letters that have been sent. Or facts relating to Mr. Sarkozy, Mr. Bartolone, the Regional Council of Ile de France, the call certainly policeman. 'We see that the four texts are held, entangled, are justified by one another.It is impossible to understand:a-The first text without knowing and studying the second dealing with the operation of the CRT.b-The role of CRT without knowing it digs into the fracturesRegional Council.c-The purpose of these collaborations executive employees of the Council with the press without knowing the existence of opposition to illegalities.By these revelations, the opposition makes public the internal struggle that book. She knows that by doing so it calls for justice.It is impossible to understand the article of September 5 and September 7 letter without repression quoted in the article of 29 August and submitted to the court by letter of 30 August. Executives released a honest example of personal crime Huchon President to warn that any punishment would be followed revelations.These texts constitute a homogeneous and united.

12) - The ChallengeAlleged offenders which we discuss the facts with the justice offenders are not used, chance, ignorance, weakness. Moreover, in these cases, they have already been judged.1 - They know what they are doingNone of the actors can not ignore that it violates the law.a-No participating Agapes London can not ignore it spends more than a day without smig corresponding contribution to the growth of tourism in the Ile de France.b-Huchon can not ignore that it does not legally offending vehicle.2 - They keep advertising factsEach actor insists that the attacks against the law to know. They worry no publicity for their actions.3 - Advertising and PeopleThe criterion of division between advertising permitted and that which is not, is the distinction between the world of managers and the general public worldwide. Access to the general public access to justice.The only risk they take into consideration are the political risks. These mean that the information has overwhelmed the context of networks of colleagues to reach the public, and the then justice.4 - Repression targetedThey work so soon as they think the general public, the classes could be informed to the point of making a political issue. Then it becomes political and judicial.Huchon is not that the exact extent of a possible spillover into public debate, therefore legal. In the case of a possible overflow public or judicial, it represses.Mr. Sarkozy, Mr. Bartolone, Mrs. William, the press, do not act otherwise. Let us stay informed but us.All these people do not want at any price, nor the intervention of public, political debate, or the intervention of the judiciary, the opening of a preliminary investigation.For this, they should disqualify the facts. This is not serious, it's funny, their management is one of professional quality frames, etc..13) - The testProfits, and thus targeted, these delinquencies are diverse.a-The concrete benefit.- For the crime, these people have access to activities that their personal financial resources do not allow their.- For delinquency, they may engage in activities that are not permitted to people as it should. For an individual, a person violate with impunity has become very difficult nowadays. It is a privilege to do so. A must.b-The transformation lawIt is clear that these executives want to act in the public practice of law as their favorite criminal forces involved in the formation of a dedicated case managers in some networks. It would be creative right.As it is between people of the same world, these acts are contrary to gradually form a kind of parallel civil code. Such as the Code "brothers" asserted by Mr. Bartolone.c-Test Republic.Like other groups today, these frameworks and networks they represent, want to see how far they can go too far at time T.If the state says no, they recede and deliver it later.If the state let go, they go further, ever further.The benchmark is the installation of a right differentialist I call feudal we can call otherwise.The trivialization of d-differentialismTerra Nova, association officials, including judges, claiming the creation of a proliferation of national identities creating separate administrative law.Emission Mr. Taddéi "Tonight or Never", FR3, Tuesday, November 6:- Guy Sorman, Ecole Polytechnique, says that civil marriage is a "piece of paper". Therefore, it can absorb gay marriage. The true marriage being religious. This one is just heterosexual. It opens the way to a plurality of legal forms of marriage.- Houria Bouteldja, President of the association "The natives of the Republic," said France is morcellée in multiple territories governed by different legal principles. "Neighborhoods" notament did not recognize the law called "French" about provisions regarding homosexuals. In this case, the separate right already exists, it is the Sharia.We are a very diverse public political movement whose point of the unit is put into question the continuity of the state and the indivisibility of the French.That offenders titled the facts mentioned request is not at all an isolated complaint.14) - Public actionA-factsNobody disputes the veracity of the allegations.Forcing the threat a Director General to reconsider his statements, the direction of the Regional Council concerned is guilty of Bribery of witness and at least the organization of a concerted barrier to justice information by organized falsification of facts through the repression of witnesses, that they and all that impressed repression.This maneuver is illegal and made public by the newspaper article.Council leaders recognize the scope of criminal acts by organizing a Witness Tampering.B-The plaintiffThis is not a nobody that caters to justice. These are the executives employees of the Regional Council.The debate has been brought before the public by members of the Council not to respond to requests for investigations of Mr. Salomone returns to support one side against the other in the Regional Council. In this case, the camp thugs against the honest people.Indeed, anyway, the fact enrich themselves by his elected office or administrative legally illegal and morally heinous.Not investigate this crime, made public by the parties, is to implement these legal DEVICES religious declare one hand that the woman is equal to man and other enact an article of the penal code called if a woman was beaten by her husband "with good intentions" no damages can be claimed.


The C-parquetMr. prosecutor can not say he does not know the offense. It is exposed publiquent. It was brought to his attention by employees of the Council through the newspaper and citizen action Mr. Salomone.By ignoring it:1 - It would not use its discretion in assessing the appropriateness of prosecution.2 - It abusing their power toa-Disqualify the Council executives who brought the corruption of the Council to press for justice's knowledge.b-Provide certainty to corrupt leaders that they are masters of their own and they have the word, and therefore the person employees as they see fit. Outside the rules of public law.It would not be a judge serene. It does not find one outraged innocence as alleged by the judge Salas. Take advantage of it so Manoeuvrist, cunning, clever.Mr. Prosecutor give body to the main policy claim alleged offenders whose acts are brought to its attention.
 They just claim the exercise of a right uneven among citizens. Right for executives. A right for the homeless ranks. Corruption frameworks leads to tiersmondisation France.15) - ConclusionI request the opening of a preliminary inquiry to this Witness Tampering.
Marc Salomone
PS: Attached a reminder:1 - Article of August 14.2 - Ll'article August 22.3 - Article August 29.4 - September 5 qty.The prosecution has all the accompanying texts.