Preliminary investigations: nolle prosequi, Courts of Appeal, President, Department of Justice.

Translation google translation. The reference text is French.

Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
French Republic
Department OF Justice 1 i nave 2012

Paris, September 18, 2012

COURT OF APPEAL OF PARIS
PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL
DE GRANDE INSTANCE, PARIS

6th Division
SECTION AC1

Civil Law & Legal Professions

The Prosecutor
to
Mr. Salomone

RE: Your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012
N / Ref: 12/00282 (to be quoted in all correspondence)

I have received your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012 that caught my attention.

But I can not give them away because they do not refer to any criminal offense.

Accordingly, I proceed to a nolle prosequi.

P / OF THE PROCUREU Republic
Brigitte FRANCESCHINI
First Deputy Prosecutor

TGI PARQUET

14 Wharf Goldsmiths
75055 Paris Cedex 01,

Appel 1
Paris, Thursday, September 27, 2012
Subject: Invitation to notice no further
No. N / Ref: 12/00282 (to be quoted in all correspondence)"1) You may appeal this decision by sending a letter grading motivated and accompanied by a copy of this Notice of classification: Attorney General at the Court of Appeal."
Mr. Attorney GeneralI, Marc Salomone, I call the classification decision made by Mr. prosecutor in Nanterre, on "letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012"Attached:- A copy of the notice of filing.- Copying letters to Mr. Prosecutor, the 17/08/12 and 09/07/121) - I call:1 - From the qualification of "mail" to my requests to open a preliminary investigation.2 - The reason for the nolle prosequi "These do was any criminal offense. ".-This is a fake.b-This assertion is the ritual formula of Flooring to get rid of mail that disturbs, is formally contradicted by the device items that highlight these criminal offenses. Articles appear every week because they are the manifestation of what frames the Ile de France want to inform the public and therefore the justice of the existence of these criminal offenses and punishment covering them.3 - From the ease with which Mr. Prosecutor silenced employees Regional Council Ile de France to alert public opinion and at the same time supporting offenders to ensure their ability to terrorize employees honest.4 - From the selection of two letters that organize arbitrary discrimination in relation to others and in effect seeks to invalidate too. The selection is not within the power of the prosecutor opportunity. It is an abuse of power.5 - From under the nolle prosequi which organizes an inequality of French law.This is primarily to protect persons of legal challenges to their crime and, beyond, to disqualify any claimant according to their social status.2) - I'll send a separate memory for the development of detailed arguments of this call. It will contain all the letters to Mr. Prosecutor.Please accept, Mr. Attorney General, my very best regards,Marc Salomone



Appel 2: Paper

Paris, Friday, Oct. 12, 2012Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney
Your Ref. 12/00 282 (quoted in all correspondence)Mr. Attorney General
The following is the full argument of the appeal sent to the Attorney-General 27 September 2012.1) - IntroductionI received the following letter from Mr. Prosecutor:"I have received your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012 that caught my attention.But I can not give them away because they do not refer to any criminal offense.Accordingly, I proceed to a nolle prosequi. '
I call on the grounds that:Title 1 - Regarding the text classification1 - This qualification is false.2 - This involves no further Mr. prosecutor in the confrontation between law-abiding citizens and criminals. It supports offenders.3 - The public debate archaic or infantile reason that the law is said.Title 2 - Regarding judicial policy implementation3 - Mr. prosecutor knew that Mr. Courroye became the Attorney General of the Court of Appeal of Paris. The conflict of interest between Mr. Courroye and this issue is clear. It is the validity of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which is implicated.4 - Mr. Prosecutor aggravates inequality before the law of French citizens.5 - The crime that I inform you precisely formed to compete with the regular government the ability to say the right. It is not only illegal. It is factious. It justifies a reminder to the law.This thesis develops each point of these two parties.Title 1 - Regarding the text classification1 - This qualification is false.2 - This involves no further Mr. prosecutor in the confrontation between law-abiding citizens and criminals. It supports offenders.3 - The public debate archaic or infantile reason that the law is said.The formula used by the prosecutor of the Republic is the ritual formula used by prosecutors to get rid of a folder. It can not therefore be taken as an expression of thought. It is a simple pirouette work. It is only by its consequences.This is why I will study the texts line by line to establish the falsity of this professional pirouette and severity of complacency or complicity with the prosecution of attacks against honest citizens of the Council.Mr. Prosecutor reported two letters. These two letters are taken voluntarily, with reflection, a set of requests for preliminary initiations. The texts selected by the prosecution are part of a subset for the Regional Council of Ile de France.I will answer the question posed by the intervention of the prosecutor of the Republic is the consistency of this subset. I argue that what makes the consistency of the subset of the Regional Council is the willingness of employees honest opinion and take it justice.This solidarity facts that organizes their succession, their difference, their order of appearance, and it reveals the social demand, making it impossible to separate texts as well as their nolle prosequi.In fact, it will appear that the arbitrary seizure of two texts in four is a pretty pathetic maneuver to deny the reality of crime, and particularly to deny the application of wage justice intervention.I will show that this leads Mr. Prosecutor in places where no one expects a magistrate. That support for offenders.This set and the subset are due to some sort of chance that wanted to press informs us in quick succession the crime alleged three executives of the state, Mr. Sarkozy and Mr. Bartolone, Huchon and his company.However, it is reasonable to think that chance is also produced by an increase of crime such that it becomes a major political event and it is impossible to ignore.Thus, the Court of Auditors does she characterize and Management Sciences Po School: "The development policy of Sciences Po could not be implemented at the cost of a leak before financial an unscrupulous management of public funds. "This was "Facilitated by the lightness of internal controls and" no, especially culpable of any control exercised by the state. " 'Lack of self-control frames. Absence of external control of the state. Certainty of impunity.It is clear that the discovery of the crime imputed to Mr. Sarkozy and crime imputed to certain officers of the Regional Council comes from citizens angered by this drift feudal certain directions of republican institutions.Crime imputed to Mr. Bartolone reads in the accounts of public events it organizes itself. It has the simplicity of things installed that we discuss more.
As we arrived as the stunning information, this, led, piecemeal, to an inquiry by the justice of the filing of preliminary initiations. I specify in each of these requests if they are worth the complaints prosecutor declares founded.2) - AllPS: attached textsRegarding A-Sarkozy.1 - Wednesday, July 4, 2012. Article Chained Duck.2 - Thursday, July 19, 2012, article in the Nouvel Observateur.3 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor.4 - Friday, July 27, 2012, Addendum.B-Regarding Mr. Bartolone5 - Wednesday, June 27, 2012. Article Chained Duck6 - Monday, 6 August 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorC-Concerning the Regional Council of Ile de France7-a-Wednesday, August 14, 2012. Article Chained Duck.8 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutorb-9 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012. Article Chained Duck.10 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutorc-11-Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Article Chained Duck.12 - Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutord-13 - Wednesday, 5 September 2012 Article of the Chained Duck14 - Friday, September 7, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorD-Madam Minister15 - Monday, September 10, 2012, letter from the Minister to Ms.16 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor. Police matter.17 - Monday, September 17. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor. Police matter.E-Mr President18 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.19 - Friday, July 27. Letter to the President of the Republic20 - Monday, August 6, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.21 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic22 - Saturday 1 September 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.23 - Friday, September 14, 2012. Letter from the Head Office of the President of the Republic.24 - Wednesday, September 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic. In response to: Head of Cabinet.Mr. F-prosecutor25 - Tuesday, September 18, 2012. Letter from the prosecutor.G-Mr. Attorney General26 - Thursday, September 27 Letter to the Court of Appeal. Call of nolle prosequi.3) - The subsetMr. prosecutor dubbed "e" these applications to open a preliminary investigation. I do not know the significance of this difference appellation. I note in case it would be an unfair maneuver. I will speak the text.These texts are drawn from newspaper articles that establish the facts.These texts follow the press articles themselves succeeded by the only difference this week. This is caused by the presence of honest Council staff in the public questioning and ultimately justice.Mr. prosecutor makes a decision regarding two letters in a larger subset consisting of four texts on the Ile de France region.On these texts it is two operations:1 - Declare that these two texts "do not refer to any criminal offense. '- "-" But I can not give them away because they do not refer to any criminal offense. '2 - Separating these two texts of the other two.1 - "I have received your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012 that caught my attention. 'We will see that the first operation is based on a false reading and the second is arbitrary and untenable.To do this we will proceed to a double reading of the texts in question.1 - Prove that the texts report criminal offenses.Mr. Prosecutor, without further classifying these emails, texts says "do not refer to any criminal offense."On the one hand, this formula is not in any work in respect of these two texts. This is the official formula by which prosecutors get rid of a text genes. After consultations adequate policies, Mr. Prosecutor cabalistic formula uses ad hoc request to throw in the trash.On the other hand, we show that:1 - The texts indicate criminal offenses.2 - The criminal offense is the theme of the establishment of these texts.3 - These criminal offenses are subject to the same law, multiple actions of justice.4 - The statement of facts is based on the story of criminal offenses. It is even simple illustration.A-The letter of 17 August 2012.To classify these two texts, Mr. Prosecutor can proceed in two ways:1 - Either Mr. Prosecutor means it is not referred to a criminal offense.a-Let all indications of a criminal offense can be presumed, in the text.Under the law, I recall that Mr. Villepin, under Prime Minister was referred to court for simple interpretations. They are valid or not, it is not our business. But he did not go to court to material facts.All citizens have the same rights to use criminal qualifications assumed by interpretation.I say this because it is obvious that my social status plays a major role in the decision of the prosecutor of the Republic.I used that five bins refuse to read or hear what they say non-bins 5 when it ails them.b-Let's see the text itself.1 - Tip of the regional dish,2 - It remains to check ...3 - It is legitimate to see this distinction in one accounting trick ..4 - At this price, there is justification for a job, or you pay a visit yourself ...5 - clever arguments ..6 - Work tools formed by the legislature ... seem diverted from their purpose ...7 - The survey will tell if there are any scheduled meetings, documents produced, what are the contacts, etc.. Without regular elements that indicate the existence of a working ...8 - these people have significant personal income ...9 - This is a passage manifest any abuse of power in the organization of a network of corruption. This is obviously a move to corruption since administrative practice to say the least is organized to prevent being discussed by the state. It becomes a law specific to the organism.10 - If it turns out that these "Olympic Agapes" have no basis for serious professional, other than sweeping assertions of crooks, I ask the following:a-and elected officials who participated in this trip fully reimburse living expenses incurred.b-qualification of corruption and squandering of public funds is examined.So references to legal infringements are well distributed throughout the text.2 - To Mr. Prosecutor believes that the facts or reasoning required from these facts do not fall under the criminal code.Let a-text.Elected officials go to London during the Olympics on a false pretext of working seminar. This trip costs 4900th per person for 4 days, 1250th day per person.1 = Smig 1100e/Mois.These people have spent their pleasure at taxpayer expense, 4 Smig monthly in four days.Mr. Prosecutor therefore considers that there is not a criminal offense to type in the body of a Local Authority for personal use.There is necessarily embezzlement, misappropriation but also of legal proceedings, such as those provided by the legislature to allow elected to work.The legislator has in fact granted the use of funds for this purpose. The CRT away to use this for personal enrichment fact.b-corruption, as it is this, is organized on two fronts:a-Financial.Elected officials and administrators personally enrich themselves.b-legislature.Divert the same law and form a private law within the public right.c-To defend themselves, the same elected organize networking fraudsters and creates a new law by a simple verbal solidarity mafia now. Which requires indeed to be checked.This solidarity is actually verbal local coverage, proactive criminal activity or criminal, as you wish. Indeed, the press tells us in the article cited below that of Wednesday, August 29:"The case is even more stain any of the 21 other regional committees of the Hexagon tourism has experienced such inflation staff. 'This remark does not apply to the subject of this text, but the next one on the composition of the CRT. It does not establish an ideology of justification under criminal to own this place.This is the logic that we find in the three cases of corruption that we have submitted to Mr. Prosecutor. They are not only to enrich themselves illegally. They aim to create a new right faction within the official law for the sole use of insiders.B-The letter of 7 September 2012.It is very short. It is based on the identification of a specific crime. Huchon, President of the Ile de France, uses a company car for personal use. While this luxury car is very specifically reserved for receptions.Reporting that I do has no other legal notices that "the institutionalization of corruption in the Regional Council of Ile de France.This statement has legal-criminal is present.b-It seems obvious that there is no need to dwell beyond the facts reported by the press.c-I enclose the article Mr. Prosecutor. I included this article in the request for a preliminary investigation by the formula: "You will find attached the latest information Chained Duck, published September 5, 2012, P. 4, under the heading "it runs for Huchon." Without signature. 'Mr. prosecutor can not say that the legal section are not included in the text.d-enrichment staffed.e-This article lists four reasons for retaining a criminal offense:1 - The criminal offense is established:"The socialist president of the Regional Council of Ile-de-France, Jean-Paul Huchon, appropriate way without a car in the area. Saab 9-5, he uses daily for its private travel, as he already has a coach function. A Prius. 'Seize the property of others, in this case the public good, without authorization, is in fact a form of theft and personal enrichment.2 - "" Everybody's doing it! "Dare one of its employees who admits that the situation is not very legal. '3 - "This premium car was purchased by the Region in May 2011, 44 150 euros. At one end, said a letter signed by the Director General of services to be "used by the regional representation, including the President at official ceremonies. ". It is therefore impossible to borrow as does Huchon. '4 - "The other local elected officials who had practiced this sport have also been persecuted by evil judges moons. 'The e-application to open a preliminary investigation is therefore a state law regarding the recognition of the illegality of criminal character, and the shock of the judges in this case of corruption.I do not understand what Mr. Prosecutor wants more to make a text "state" of a "criminal offense. 'In any case, you must tell us as Huchon may violate laws and regulations without any "criminal offense".2 - Prove that the separation of the four texts is impossible to examine the legal consequences.We will resume the four texts and see the deception that is their separation.A-The second text, that of August 28.It is established from the article of Wednesday, August 22.The text of Tuesday, August 28 focuses on corruption constitutive CRT, Regional Tourism Committee. Early legal (or honest, because it seems that the prosecution make a distinction between the two practices), the CRT then drift to the fraudulent company. I refer to the analysis.However, this text does not exist without the former.Neither the text nor the information.The two are a couple.The text is called "complement".It is because information on the operation of corruptive OJ seems that information appears on the CRT next week.The space-time of this publication alone is significant by its narrowness.Why the second article on the CRT?Because it is the CRT which is the vehicle of corruption in London.This second text tells us that the CRT is not only a vehicle for corruption.It is constituted by corruption. It is a cheese alone.It is therefore impossible that actually works for its purpose. Indeed, at least half of the employees are not there to develop the skills, but CRT to enhance the balance of power within the Council and to establish a feudal administration of distributing bribes to victory.Again we find the dual role of this corruption:a-Type in the boxb-Former government unbeknownst to them using the legality and diverting them form.B-The third text, that of 30 August 2012.It is also embedded in the second which is itself out of the first text.Indeed, this text describes the retaliation suffered by the senior official who provides information to the press. For advisors, it is a balance. These texts follow the press articles themselves succeeded by the only difference this week.a-The first article says: cf. August 28, 2012.- "Do not look I did the math," the coward "duck" CEO Jean-Pierre Blat, disarming candor. "I can tell you that in 47% of cases, the presence of employees is in line with regional politicians or their political past. ".b-The second article says: cf. Chained Duck on Wednesday 29 August 2012.- "The revelations of the" Duck "on the Regional Tourism Committee (CRT) in the Ile-de-France, became the piston machine politicians in the region, have earned a serous avoinée the Director General of the agency, Jean -Pierre Blat But this is not to be hired with a vengeance children, spouses, relatives or friends of the heart of its elected leaders rallied her bracesHis mistake: he confessed to waterfowl that "in 47% of cases, the presence of employees (tourism committee) is in connection with regional politicians or their political past." Since Blat was asked to retract his confession ... ".This text, and section motivates, establish a criminal ideology that plays on the solidarity between the networks of power to form, develop, continue, companies based on criminal offenses.In fact, by the force of things, Mr. Prosecutor acts within the network of solidarity.The fourth C-text, that of 7 September 2012.We have seen that contains all the qualifications requested by Mr. criminal prosecutor.I then put it back into perspective.The journal publishes information September 5, 2012.One week after state repression of the official informant.It is clear that the press wants there to indicate that corruption in the Ile de France is not a mirage or the awkwardness of junior.The President himself set the example.Nothing is forced to use a car rather than another. They are both luxury.Simply use one is legal, the use of another is illegal.Huchon is keen to challenge the state, the law, the Republic.He can afford to defy the law.It remains unclear what authority he is to enforce the other. As a form of corruption has not been considered.Mr. Prosecutor is appointed to the office which is his to give the French people the assurance that the institutions of the republic are in good hands.Contrary to his assertions, the question is obvious, the judicial inquiry is required, based inevitable.4) - The logic of facts and lawHow is it that Mr. Prosecutor pretends to have received two texts?- "I have received your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012 that caught my attention. 'These two texts are rejected directly nested within the other two on the Ile de France. They are also called: Ins.1 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor2 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor3 - Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor4 - Friday, September 7, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorThese four texts are comments from four sections of unequal length. These articles appear weekly. The: 14, 22, 29 August and 5 September. This continuity is not due to chance. It contradicts the assertion of Mr. Prosecutor.Follow these four items because they are at the request of a party's employees of the Regional Council of Ile de France.The first article says the "Agape", informs the public that members of the Council, elected officials, went to London for pleasure, at taxpayer expense enhances the action of the CRT, Regional Committee tourism in this corruption case.The second article shows us that CRT itself is formed by procedures corruption. He gives us to know the origin of these items. It is a framework employee.The third article tells us about the repression suffered by the employee part. He was forced to withdraw. This is akin to action torture.The fourth article speaks directly to the President of the Regional Council. In person. It states that corruption does not clandestine activities. It comes from the leaders of the Council.This article may have been written under the dictation of employees of the Council. They know only the depravity intimate Leaders Council.5) - Questions on a nolle prosequiA-nolle prosequi two of the four texts on the Regional Council is primarily a political act free of any judicial consideration.These four texts stand as the three following are comments and explanation of the first. They shed light in particular on internal demand pay to the Board of public action. Indicated only the third terror text prevents direct action. I'm not that sort of pen. Even if I have understood after the fact, while writing this Call.B-The nolle prosequi is a positive act causing Mr. Prosecutor on grounds surprising for a magistrate.When Mr. prosecutor said that the texts submitted are not "state of any criminal offense," he does not get rid of only a cleaning agent that he despises status.Mr. Prosecutor is conducting a series of operations involved in the operation of the Regional Council itself.He was involved in a fight between good people within the Regional Council. A clash between corrupt and honest employees.b-He knows that this confrontation, which he now takes part, through episodes of pressures that can be likened to torture: "Since Blat was asked to retract his confession." cf., Chained Duck Wednesday, August 29. It remains to tell Mr. Blat it made him laugh. In any case, these pressures are intended to deceive the court, to prevent by dishonest means the regular course of judicial proceedings.c He opts for the corrupt.On the one hand, it guarantees them impunity for their actions both corruption and their violent actions to impede the action of justice.On the other hand, they can guarantee their silence whistleblowers.d-It goes beyond the protection of bankrupt because they are his world. It delivers the victims to their torturers. He is complicit in the illegal dictatorship of the latter, and aggression, moral and physical, suffered by the former.e-He uses his power to protect those he considers to be his fellows, with what he believes to be disqualified attacks by people belonging to classes other than their own or those of persons under causes, and it intends to protect for this.The f-about Mr. prosecutor is outrageous for the officials who gave this information to the press, some of whom have suffered reprisals for damaging their careers and thus their health and their family life.g-Mr prosecutor should pay more attention to the person of those citizens who take risks to inform the court and the opinion of the corruption in their government.Instead of publicly guarantee that these people will be monitored and therefore protected by the judiciary, Mr. Prosecutor informed their leaders are covered in crime, light or heavy. He therefore the message of impunity of corrupt and freedom to punish law-abiding citizens who denounce. And this is precisely the case here.This issue of the protection of citizens who want to work with justice for all files of this set. It is raised in the letters informing the prosecutor of the Republic of the intervention of a political police.Mr. prosecutor establishes its action on the basis of the right of citizens inequality. This is not acceptable.6) - aims and tricksThese two classifications are not followed to dislocate and gradually invalidate the request for a preliminary investigation for corruption network of the Regional Council of Ile de France.The prosecution does not admit an ordinary man calls into question the authorities of the State.This is true for Regional Advisor is also true for the previous Head of State, in exercise at the time, and the Chairman of the National Assembly.The prosecution never admit a cleaning agent leads statesmen leaders before a judge. We are not in the United States.This review aims to give a nolle prosequi for each of the texts together. It is a willful obstruction, calculated, cunning, the regular functioning of the judiciary.7) - correspondence concerning Mr. Sarkozy and Mr. BartoloneTherefore, I present two letters regarding these two personalities. I have attached the related documents.A-The letters of Thursday, July 19 and Friday July 27.1 - Sarkozy has violated. It remains to establish judicially. The charge is visual, written, public, signed. The facts have been refuted by anyone. This is the charge that has been dismissed as outrageous, shameful, degrading to the author.But the facts themselves were not discussed by anyone. At least to my knowledge.2 - Mr. Sarkozy was sucking the penis by a person obliged to do so. The means of this constraint are studied in the memory request for a preliminary investigation with complaint if necessary.Rape is obvious.It is likely that the rape was planned, scheduled, organized. This is the only version that reflects the facts.3 - This person is a member. Elected a nation. A representative legislature.She sucked the sex of the representative of the executive power. Mr Sarkozy is not only the executive branch, but it can not not represent, embody. He was elected to it. Moreover, it holds that rape during a medal ceremony, so when the public manifestation of this power.4 - The Executive Branch has violated the Legislature.The rape is organizing a conflict between the powers of the Republic aimed at reducing public one before the other, one by the other. The symbolic form of the thing does not diminish the scope of the act when it comes to forms of organization to which the symbolic is an essential part of their reality.There has therefore been a violation of the constitution.5 M. Sarkozy is therefore both Civil Court and High Courts. Which the Heads of State judge for violation of the constitutional form of government.6 - Mr. Sarkozy can not refer to a total immunity of the Head of State not accountable to justice.He has violated the constitution. The immunity does not apply to these facts.b-total immunity is an archaic notion that is undermined by all jurisdictions of the world.Besides c-France, more no State agrees to cover former heads of state laws by extending immunities they have been enacted or that the Democrats passed when they left him to hasten thereof.d-French justice can not both judge several African Heads of State on behalf of that person their civil person distinct from their state and head of state to recognize the right of French seigneur of French people , women or men.This recognition is e-making on the grounds that it is his civilian who is not himself state and the second covering first. Notwithstanding that there is both the civilian and state which violates.7 - All of this is being discussed in the two papers in this matter.8 - no further application of the preliminary investigation fellatio imposed by Sarkozy would result in de facto, by the principle of universality of law, that Madam First Deputy Prosecutor, Brigitte Franceschini, should accede to such a request of the prosecutor of the Republic or the Prosecutor General.The separation of powers and independence of the judiciary instead judges the same statutory position that Mr. Head of State.The formula used by Mrs. William, and adopted by all the network executives is as follows: "When you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. ". New Observer, Thursday 19 July 2012.It applies to all women senior managers.The vulgarity of fascist networks executives of state begins to pose serious problems.B-The letter of Friday, July 27, 2012Mr. Bartolone maintenance of relationships with a logical mafia businessman.He was offered the cost of political and professional reception on his birthday by a racketeer citizen who has the soul so deep in the body that lives in Switzerland.This raises the questions:a-The existence of personal enrichment by these parties anniversaries and other hunting in Sologne.a-The possibility of an agreement mafia, active agreement involving reciprocity, a give-and win-win.b-The ability to oppose Mr. Bartolone among others practice it at home.c-means available to the enemies of the French government to take Mr. Bartolone.These issues are the sole responsibility of the judiciary, but it can not escape it.8) - The political policeThe letters of 28 August and 17 September.These letters show what I call the police intervention policy.It is certain that these people have called me to be dishonest.I know the police policy and procedures.I know that the prosecutor is kidnapped, kidnapping, torture, until they withdraw their complaints, the complainants that hinder state personnel.I request that this matter be investigated before these people act out.9) - The public debate lawyersA-debateIn 2007, on the occasion of the request to open a criminal investigation relating to the acquisition of an apartment by Mr Sarkozy, a debate within the network executives held. The Parisian newspaper gave visible form of opposition between two views of lawyers. That of a judge and that of a lawyer.The judge said a-right uneven, feudal, or colonial census.- DENIS SALAS, magistrate and researcher *"NO comment on the action of Marc Salomone, it seems important to remain very cautious about the use of criminal weapon, including termination. It seems dangerous to make a referral to the judge for a popular action, that is to say very much open to any citizen, there is no filter, the risk of lead to what I call the penal populism. The information has a perverse effect. Just look at the number of those who have ruined the lives of some people. How denunciations result in a non-place! But the damage is done, since the charge, once released, remains as a stain. 'Interview by A.-C.J. Le Parisien, October 2007.b-The lawyer reminded the constitutional principle of equal rights for all citizens, of all people.CHRISTIAN Etelin lawyer in Toulouse"From the moment so serious, it is shown that public men, elected by the people, benefit from exchange of best practices, and they can be suspected of influence peddling, any citizen has an interest in acting. Because if the preliminary investigation shows that there has been wrongdoing, it is often on account of public funds embezzlement that took place, and it is the taxpayers' money has been squandered. The ordinary people are also taxpayers. As such, anyone can ask for explanations, and even interest in running the judiciary. In the case of Mr. Salomone, the preliminary investigation will determine whether his approach was based. 'Interview by A.-C.J. Le Parisien, October 2007.The B-FunkMr. Salas is full judicial feudalism.Its purpose is also the expression of a funk. These people are afraid of justice. Once these are some of them who are affected by the brutality of the police and judiciary. This is the stampede can.But:a-Who doubts for a moment that if this information was erroneous, senior state would enter into warriors in the judge's office and come out as winners?b-There is no risk of this mess innocents. They are neither poor nor weak or mentally handicapped.c-The prosecution is for them.The argument of "dirty" due to "slander" is a diversion.What do they fear?10) - and feudalism Republic1 - Solidarity framesA-Two ArticlesTwo newspaper articles are well staged a division of society into two worlds. The executive, the ordinary people.They do this in the context of the alleged rape case charged Mr. Sarkozy.a-The article Chained Duck, Wednesday 4 July 2012.b-The article Nouvel Observateur, Thursday 19 July 2012.This article appears on the day of filing my application to open a criminal investigation. It seems that I was not the only one wondering about this. This is the form of the question is different.
B-The statement of the two textsa-The Chained Duck:- "And yet she did not have written a bomb. Good performance, close to that of a certain Valerie T., who in 140 characters, recently assassinated former president of his beloved with some impact. These days, when a woman takes the pen, presidents have to behave themselves ...Feel ... All recognizable. And none of those, made by Devedjian has enjoyed seeing his selfless commitment to serve the citizens of Hauts-de-Seine caricatured.Food policy loses its charm when it is bitten way too realistic. And Marie-Celie tells that during an appointment with Sarko asking for funds for the museum of his city, a local politician has been demanding a "treat.""Be nice ... you can see that I need to relax. Come on, it's not much! You can not leave me like this. ". Have said the monarch. The elected not dropped and got funding. Worship scene is not for anything in the success of the work-contempt president."I wanted to talk about the relationship between power and sex. The subject is taboo. But this is the only non-violent scene in my book. "Defends Marie-Celie, who knows the brutal world of politics to have started in 1997 by Balladur. 'b-Le Nouvel ObservateurNew Article observer About Mrs. William led by journalist- "Machismo bonusThe middle of the book, she asserts the coup de grace to the monarch. In his office, he receives an elected when his breath becomes short: "Be nice ... You see that I need to relax! Come on, this is not much ..." Again, nothing to offend:I wanted to talk about the relationship between a man of power and sex. The scene exists, but it is universal. This is perhaps the only scene from the book that is not violent. It is trivial. This elected cares, she has seen others. When you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs. "Celia Marie-Guillaume said it, get away with such cases by distributing a pair of slaps, but does wear "no moral judgment" on those who give. Jean Sarkozy and does not come frightened son play.
 She tells another scene, she does not appear in the book: One day we were in the lobby of the General Council and arrive two pretty blondes who had an appointment with him. I stupidly told him: 'Hey, John, you're not shit!' He looks at me shocked: "Why do you say that? I have not inherited all the vices father! ""C-The Common FrontOur goal here is not to analyze these two items on the bottom. The merit function slavery but it is not our object. I just want to point the signals sent to the attention of the public and the judiciary to put all these people agree on the fact that nothing happened and the populace, that is to say, the courts must be kept out of it.The a-treatIn the case of the Sofitel on Strauss-Kahn, the phrase "a trussing servant" has earned the resignation of his paper the author.But behind the victim there was the NY Attorney, ie the U.S. government. The U.S. government knows how to follow his prey. Seen with feminist mobilizations in the western region against Mr. Strauss-Kahn.In the case of Sarkozy, U.S. Master is rather favorable to the alleged perpetrator. It reserves the right course to pursue the forfeitures of the French state later.French managers always think their world as the 19th century was born. Therefore, the conceptual provisions are made to keep between themselves. Rape is a "treat". The formula will be taken by elected officials, including Mr. Balkany.Connoisseurs note in the current usage of the term ordinary logic rapists. They joked. If victims and the public have no sense of humor, it is up to them.This logic at work in the article Duck structure as whole article Nouvel Obs. and Mrs. William about.- "Again, nothing to offend:- "... The only scene in the book that is not violent. It is trivial. This elected cares, she has seen others. "We stick sides with laughter.b-signals recklessnessThe report is made out of serious. The reality of things is elsewhere. If this book has gained prominence is due to psychological blunders of those involved. Neither the author nor the alleged victim, there have attached the slightest importance. The author is amazed that a rape case, a service of the ordinary can bring many emotions.A newspaper, but all the other compares the book to Mrs. William Mrs. Trierweiler Tweet.- "Beautiful performance close to that of a certain Valerie T., who in 140 characters, recently assassinated former president of his beloved with some impact. '- Then there is the information of the rape of a quarrel lady, a battle skirt that men look with astonishment and fear, because women are unpredictable. I would add, for the tone, especially if they have their own rules: "These days, when a woman takes the pen, presidents have to behave themselves ... 'As tweens say: ducks fart, flies flying low. But they say free.Another newspaper, but any other, develops the theme of Machismo incurable men.Being in a trance sex, get a woman, blows over, hand to fly him stick his cock in her mouth, becaufe uncontrollable impulse has a craving does not suffer the discussion, etc.. this is trivial, but can be a little old-fashionedThe banality of fact is legally restricted to executives of the state. Specify for the young readers.In any case, it's the same as having a Hollywood doll on each arm as a revolt against the father.In one case, the roughness of the political and legal story of the crime are smoothed by assimilating this information to papoteries good women.In the other, the same effect is obtained by equating this crime story narrative exhibitions of sexual conquests of a young man near the criminal. If he is legally in showing women that will be kiss him why he looks so would not legally in raping a woman who does not dare refuse?We are stunned by the evidence of the matter.2 - The law is publicMrs. William wrote:- "When you're a politician, if you are not able to handle it, it is better to change jobs."Celia Marie-Guillaume said it, get away with such cases by distributing a pair of slaps, but does wear "no moral judgment" on those who give. ".In doing this it makes rape a private matter.However, it is rape public for several reasons:a-There has been raped. A member can not be consenting to suck on his third order.- This order establishes a servo ratio between French (men or women, because the action of Mr. Sarkozy has no sexual priority, it aims to introduce a droit de seigneur administrative unisex).- It also establishes a relation of subordination of the Executive on the Legislative Power. A member can not accept it.- Neither the one nor the other can not forget who they are or where they are.b-It takes place in public in a public place.c-The rape took place in the public sphere for the exercise of executive power.d-It is a criminal offense.E-criminal offenses are public by definition. Unless it considers that justice does not have to deal with all offenses.f-This is the rape of a person, a woman, of the Constitution.That's a lot for a private affair.Formula under the guise Mrs. William avens a gentleman's agreement between the ladies of high society is a proposed regression feudal French law.This regression is the feudal point of view of all executives who spoke on the subject.Mrs. William, despite his qualifications, not MP. Arrangements it proposes can meet scientific calculations careers of women managers while others like them darken in the pile with a bulldozer.In this case, it can extend his arm on brave sinful to assure them of his commiseration. In this case, the phrase "I do not want to wear" no moral judgment "on those who give" can probably be discussed.However, it does not seem to notice that it speaks of a Member and Head of State. In other words, constitutional republican form of government. In this context, we expect indeed any judgment "moral" in any case not hers.The only decision that we were not expecting is the court of the Republic, made on behalf of the French people.3 - ConclusionOne journalist Catherine Nay, does not endorse this regression. This person is interesting because it is close to Mr Sarkozy, on which she had written a book of praise. She used to rub the Heads of State and Government, on which she writes books. This is not an adventurer.During a program on Canal + in July 2012, for the presentation of his own book, she was asked about the book Mrs. William. It reads:- "I have not read the book. But if what is reported by the media is true, it is very serious. ".By these simple words, it reintroduces the national unity and justice in the debate.
Title 2 - Regarding judicial policy implementation3 - Mr. prosecutor knew that Mr. Courroye became the Attorney General of the Court of Appeal of Paris. The conflict of interest between Mr. Courroye and this issue is clear. It is the validity of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which is implicated.4 - Mr. Prosecutor aggravates inequality before the law of French citizens.5 - The crime that I inform you precisely formed to compete with the regular government the ability to say the right. It is not only illegal. It is factious. It justifies a reminder to the law.8 - The Attorney General CourroyeThe prosecutor knew that Mr. Courroye take the place of Attorney General in Paris, and that the presence or participation by the force of things affect the file review.A-2007: The apartmentMr. Courroye deliberately put his duties and powers of the Judicial Service Sarkozy.In 2007, in the case of the apartment of the Ile de la Jatte, under prosecutor in Nanterre, Marc Salomone has filed a request for a preliminary investigation.He did not advocate the latter having refused any association. One said: "I probably will not take this folder. I do not want to lose all my trial. "Another, among other things, specializes in litigation to African Heads of State said:" Excuse me, I have a plane to catch. ".The police first tried to manipulate the testimony of Mr. Salomone. Then Mr. Courroye ranked without hearing anyone other than the promoter, a 80 year old woman. No document search was performed. No calling of witnesses took place.In 2012, on the basis of new facts reported by the press, Mr. Salomone has filed a new application, this time to the Parquet de Paris. The Paris prosecutor's office has forwarded to the public prosecutor of Nanterre has extended the no further action within 48 hours.Press warned by care Parquet covered the nolle prosequi.The Court of Appeal issued its decision within 48 hours after receiving the letter of appeal.

For cons, the Court of Appeal has six months to send the decision to share. Throughout this period, she invented absurd excuses, such as the burning of the Court to justify the decision not to send. This end-to-one to deny access to Justice. A felony third world.Mr. Courroye has already objected to Mr. Salomone as Sarkozy's party.Case B-BetancourtIn this case, the Ministry of Justice and the various bodies of the Judiciary had to state that Mr. Courroye judicial support is unwavering Sarkozy.- Mr. Courroye was:- Indicted- Divested- Transferred in the interest of service- Summoned as a witnessAll these official actions were approved by the Superior Council of the Judiciary whenever it is held.In all these scenarios, it is the personal use of the powers of the magistrate Mr. Courroye to serve the cause of justice Sarkozy, including against current procedures, which is involved.It is heard as a witness in Bordeaux, Tuesday, Oct. 2, because:- Records indicate that he met with Mr. Sarkozy in 2009, 2010,2011.- Court decisions on the progress of the investigation were forwarded to Mr Sarkozy unduly.- These meetings have clearly led to change its legal action.- These investigations involve sordid reasons, including suspicion of illegal financing of the election campaign of Mr Sarkozy in 2007.We see that Mr. Courroye is fully involved in the defense subjective, political, Sarkozy. It is incapable of the slightest impartiality when it comes to the latter.C-The conflict of interestI do not impute to Mr. Courroye the possible rejection of these requests. I know the willingness of judges to distinguish legally the French according to their classes and their refusal to any questioning administered by the administrative or state officials, including jusqu'y coverage of criminal activity.
For cons, I believe that there is a certain bias. Mr. Courroye will never accept any questioning of Mr. Sarkozy. Whatever the reason. It is a public fact for which he did not hesitate to confront the hierarchy of judicial authority.This certainty of conflict of interest is recognized by the courts, and taken into account in its action. Indeed, Bordeaux, Judge Jean-Michel Gentil not receive Mr. Courroye like other summoned. The difference in treatment due to the fact that it would be difficult for Mr. Courroye being questioned by officers from the criminal brigade under his command when he led the investigation into the case until the end of 2010.Mr. prosecutor in Paris knew this when he closed because two requests to undertake disqualify others.9 - This CallingThe fact that no further rankings do not include texts about Mr. Sarkozy does not alter the case.The aim of this same nolle prosequi is to bring the classification of all applications and therefore those for Sarkozy.The presence of the Prosecutor General Mr. Courroye will speed maneuvers procedures to juggle species Nafissatou Dialo who thinks that France is America and scrubbers loo handle cases men of State.10 - discredit the Court of AppealTherefore what Mr. prosecutor managed to organize in this procedural maneuver that is very clever estimate is to doubt the quality of the Court of Appeal of Paris to judge calmly without this ranking on. It casts serious doubt on the decisions of the Courts of Appeal.11 - Rupture of equality between FrenchMr. Sellière and exclusive judicialAt the same time that these claims are filed and that two of them are classified without consequences, justice is active against a frame belonging to a network other than the State.Mr. Sellière been:- The opening of a criminal investigation for tax evasion.- A search of his home in September 2012.This does not affect our case, except for one detail: the judicial policy that highlights.Mr. Sellière doubt also the facts, charges, judgments.But it is tried and tax-advantaged.The organizers of the program "Further investigation" of 4/10/12, we say:"The IRS suspects Mr. Sellière of having" deliberately avoided the establishment and payment of taxes, "more a summons to court. Subject to verification.We are in the same order of facts as those dismissed by Mr. Prosecutor.In one case, there is a possible criminal offense.In either case, there is none.The problem that is posed here is that of judicial policy followed by the magistrates.Judges know how to take the poor and capitalists. But, unless settlement of accounts, the only networks of populations that are saved are State officials.Rupture of equality between French citizens is obvious.12 - The Fraud ActThe lawyer for a plaintiff in the case Solfur, Master Gastaud presented his analysis of the abuse of rights.This is quite interesting for our case:M ° Gastaud:- "There is abuse of rights. Fraud Act.The letter of the law is respected. By against the spirit of the law is violated.Ways appear legal. The end is not. ".This is exactly the status of requests dropped.I do not return here the analysis I made these requests in the body of the text. I note that my concerns are those of lawyers confirmed.13 - The hatred and contemptAmong the critical elements of the decision to discontinue the proceedings, the argument of distinction by judges between two classes of citizens, lower and upper, one in particular being disqualified in their desire to enter the judiciary, other by being beyond the reach of judicial criticism s first.Admittedly, the diatribe feudal magistrate Salas is illuminating. But it is open to interpretation because it is outside the judicial practice.So we defer judicial policy as set by a judge during the hearing.A newspaper article reproduces a random segment court proceedings.In: The Chained Duck, P: 6, Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012.Book: "We ... the city"Authors: Rachid Ben Bella, Sylvain Erambert, Riadh Lakhéchène Alexander Philibert, Joseph Ponthus.Discovery Editions."" Without even looking up from the folder in which it is immersed, the judge sentences the application asks the young thug he has a job now.It said that in the context of a project with the club prevention, it is being describe an article for "The Duck"."The duck is 'Nanterre info'? asked the judge. - No, I do not know if you know this is a newspaper called "The Chained Duck" ... The head judge, who suddenly stares "Le Canard chained", but this is not possible: you worked at Quick ... ". "True story.A person who worked as a laborer naturally can not write in a journal known. A newspaper read by judges. A journal managers.QED.14 - A crime factiousA-duplicityA major reason for the crime of managers in France is the impunity granted to them by judges.This crime also intended to demonstrate that judicial immunity. It is very clear that crime is a provocation, a challenge to the law, in the three types of cases in which I ask for a preliminary investigation (Mr. Sarkozy, Mr. Bartolone, Huchon).C-The Italian referenceThis logic has been beautifully designed in the Italian film "A citizen above suspicion. ". Elio Petri, 1970. No doubt that the question was already in Italy in the 70s. (Synopsis: A head of the police criminal murders his mistress, and will do everything possible to guide the investigation on him ... but he will simultaneously use his new situation - he was promoted to head political division of the State Security - to try to confuse investigators. Meanwhile, he leads an activity tending to prove that subversion is identified with common crimes ...)After it was the "Years of Lead" and the Red Brigades.D-The French SuiteIn France, it is not unrelated to this crime:Let a-coming to the Kalashnikov in the streets of major cities in France,B-Que police disintegrate.When the head of state rape people with impunity, elected officials, the constitutional form of government;When the President of the National Assembly may sit without accountability on these links bond with at least one wheeler he calls "a brother";When the President of the Regional Council of larger tape France openly in the crate, to simplify without caricaturing;When the judiciary, such as Italy 60s, covers these criminal activities, not give legal, but normal, the field is open for adventures like Mr. Merah. As senior Italian criminal arrogance has paved the way for various terrorism.E-Aiming institutionalThese people already know that my requests were made. They have already discussed with the prosecutor.They want not a non-place, a nolle prosequi, an amnesty.They want to win and say the right.They will not say more for "Mr. Blat" to "return to their statements." They will be silent. They want to organize their justice to how the East India Company organized in his territory.15) - ConclusionExperience teaches us, as well as a number of French, the parquet class without following all complaints that hinder the authorities in place, especially the various castes affiliated with the State, especially when deposited by persons considered vulnerable, weak, socially or personally, what is the same thing here.These two classifications without preparing suites so progressive ranking all applications. It is a maneuver of billiards.It remains to be seen whether the Court of Appeal will cover the crime of which the statement is submitted.Accept the non-place is here:-Take a public stand for criminals of the Ile de France in their actions and their fight against the honest employees.b-Do not solve the conflict of interest posed by the presence of Mr. Courroye.c-To say that judges are fools, incompetents, which may unduly jeopardize statesmen.d-Opt implicitly legalized rape of women, MP (s) of the Constitution by the Head of State, and consequently, jurisprudence, by his subordinates.Opting for e-acceptance relationships between men mafia state and civilian thugs.It is simply there to question the morality of a legally elected president.I suggest that even showing the disgust expressed by the magistrate Salas towards "popular action", the Court of Appeal to allow the justice to hear and say the right. Remains whether the judges of the Court of Appeal have confidence in the justice of their country.I also informed the judges of the Court of Appeal of Paris that I will not allow to renew the scam of the Court of Appeal of Versailles. These judges made me dally during 6 months to send me their decision. Such dishonest waiting for me just to help me turn to the courts of Europe.In case the French judges are unable to cope with their responsibilities, as this suggests no further, I will turn as soon as possible to the European authorities, explaining the machinations of French judges.
Marc SalomonePS: attached texts1) - With regard to Mr. Sarkozy.1 - Wednesday, July 4, 2012. Article Chained Duck.2 - Thursday, July 19, 2012, article in the Nouvel Observateur.3 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor.4 - Friday, July 27, 2012, Addendum.2) - Regarding Mr. Bartolone5 - Wednesday, June 27, 2012. Article Chained Duck6 - Monday, 6 August 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor3) - On the Regional Council of Ile de France7-a-Wednesday, August 14, 2012. Article Chained Duck.8 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutorb-9 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012. Article Chained Duck.10 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutorc-11-Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Article Chained Duck.12 - Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutord-13 - Wednesday, 5 September 2012 Article of the Chained Duck14 - Friday, September 7, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor
4) - Madam Minister15 - Monday, September 10, 2012, letter from the Minister to Ms.16 - Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor. Police matter.17 - Monday, September 17. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor. Police matter.5) - the President of the Republic18 - Thursday, July 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.19 - Friday, July 27. Letter to the President of the Republic20 - Monday, August 6, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.21 - Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic22 - Saturday 1 September 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic.23 - Friday, September 14, 2012. Letter from the Head Office of the President of the Republic.24 - Wednesday, September 19, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic. In response to: Head of Cabinet.6) - Mr. Prosecutor25 - Tuesday, September 18, 2012. Letter from the prosecutor.7) - Mr. Attorney General26 - Thursday, September 27 Letter to the Court of Appeal. Call of nolle prosequi.End.


 President

Paris, Friday, Oct. 12, 2012

François HOLLAND
President

Mr. President

I have the honor to communicate to you the notice of nolle prosequi of the prosecutor of the Republic concerning requests for preliminary initiations about two of the four faults reported some Councillors and employees of the Regional Council Ile de France.

This place prepares a non-generalized. As usual.

You will also find attached the call that I made and the memory provided for this purpose.

I beg you to accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,

Marc Salomone

Minister of Justice

Paris, Friday, Oct. 12, 2012

Minister of Justice  Christiane TAUBIRA
Attorney,


Chief of Staff
Mr. Christian Vigouroux

Business technical adviser reserved
Eric Lafontaine

13, place Vendôme
75042 PARIS CEDEX 01
Tel. : 01 44 77 60 60
Fax: 01.44.77.60.81

Madam Minister

I have the honor to communicate to you the notice of nolle prosequi of the prosecutor of the Republic concerning requests for preliminary initiations about two of the four faults reported some Councillors and employees of the Regional Council Ile de France.

This place prepares a non-generalized. As usual.

You will also find attached the call that I made and the memory provided for this purpose.

I beg you to accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,


Marc Salomone